Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

This is a randomised, open-label, placebo, crossover, multicentre study with a single visit. The study will comprise five sub-studies. Subjects will receive inactive treatment (placebo) via the ELLIPTA® inhaler and one of the other inhaler devices depending on the sub-study they are randomised to. Only subjects who are naïve to the ELLIPTA inhaler and to one of the other inhaler devices that will be used in this study will be included. Furthermore, subjects who are naïve to the BREEZEHALER® and HANDIHALER® inhalers must be naïve to all other inhaler devices that requires a capsule. The study will be conducted in the UK and the Netherlands, and comprises one visit only. A sufficient number of subjects (at least 600) with COPD will be screened and 570 will be randomised to one of five sub-studies. Eligible subjects will be allocated to one of the sub-studies depending on their experience of using the other inhaler (i.e., depending on which other inhaler they are naïve to). This study is designed to assess the proportion of COPD subjects making critical and overall (i.e., critical and non-critical errors) errors in using ELLIPTA inhaler and other commercially available inhaler devices such as the TURBUHALER®, HANDIHALER, BREEZHALER, MDI and DISKUS®/ACCUHALER® inhalers. This study will also assess the 'ease of use' and preference between the ELLIPTA inhaler and the other commercially available inhaler devices. ELLIPTA, DISKUS, and ACCUHALER are registered trademarks of the GSK group of companies. TURBUHALER is a registered trademark of AstraZeneca. HANDIHALER is a registered trademark of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. BREEZHALER is a registered trademark of Novartis AG.

The study aims to assess the clinical and economic impact of a pharmaceutical care program initiated in the Emergency Department versus conventional follow-up of patients with decompensated heart failure/COPD.

The objective of this study is to investigate molecular, cytological and genetic features of occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in conditions of different occupational exposures. In order to achieve this goal serum pro-inflammatory cytokines and standard inflammation markers level, hemostasis, cytological analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs1800470 transforming growing factor β1 (TGF β1) gene, rs1828591 hedgehog interacting protein (HHIP) gene, rs4129267 interleukin 6 receptor (IL-6R) gene, rs1051730 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor 3 (CHRNA3) gene with COPD in subjects exposed to silica dust and in those exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exhaust will be investigated. The relationship between genotype and phenotype characteristics, such as an inflammation activity, assessed by C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α) serum concentration, in different occupational COPD groups will be studied. The hypothesis is that the mechanisms underlying disease development and progression are different due to environmental risk factor that reflex in differs in disease attributes - molecular biomarkers, cytology results and genetic susceptibility between COPD due to dust, COPD due to chemicals and COPD in smokers therefore COPD can be subdivided into ecological phenotypes according to environmental risk factor.

New perceptions about handling and patient satisfaction of the everyday use of Berodual® Respimat® compared to a powder inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD). Moreover, further knowledge should be attained about the tolerability of Berodual® Respimat®

Tolerability, efficacy and handling of Berodual® Respimat® 20/50µg/dose solution for inhalation in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease in daily practice

The aim of this postmarketing surveillance is to obtain further information about the tolerability and efficacy of Berodual® metered-dose inhaler in the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory tract disease under conditions of daily practice

1: Is endothelium function impaired in COPD? Other chronic cardiovascular diseases are associated with endothelial dysfunction, and the endothelium plays an important role in regulating vascular tone, tissue blood flow, coagulation and the inflammation process. Although the specific causes of endothelial dysfunction remain unclear, physical inactivity, chronic systemic inflammation and smoking are all known to be associated with endothelial abnormality. 2. Is Muscular Sympathetic Nerve Activity (MSNA) increased in COPD? A balanced regulation of blood flow to skeletal muscles may be disturbed by pathophysiology and may therefore contribute to the exercise intolerance and skeletal muscle depletion seen in patients with COPD.Skeletal muscle blood flow is tightly regulated to match tissue oxygen demands and is thus adapted to meet energy requirements. During physical activity, the sympathetic nervous system is activated ("exercise pressor reflex"), resulting in increased ventilation, heart rate and a redistribution of cardiac output from inactive to active tissues. The redistribution of cardiac output to the body organs is heterogeneous. Blood flow to skeletal, respiratory and cardiac muscle increases as exercise intensity increases, whereas blood flow to gastrointestinal, renal and reproductive tissues decreases. As blood pressure during exercise remains largely unchanged, the redistribution of blood flow is caused by changes in vascular conductance. These conductance changes are caused by an overall vasoconstriction induced by the increased sympathetic outflow of noradrenaline (NA), and a vasodilation of vascular beds supplying the working skeletal -, cardiac- and respiratory muscle.

The aim of this study is to reduce the number of subsequent hospital admissions and/or emergency department (ED) visits for hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by utilizing a respiratory care practitioner-led disease management (RCP-DM) program compared to standard discharge instructions and planning.

The purpose of this study is to investigate weather or not the use of a procalcitonin(PCT)-based treatment in the daily clinical work could lower the consumption of antibiotics in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major health concern, with a substantial impact on a patient's life. However, the impact of COPD is currently under-recognised and, as a result, COPD is under-treated. An exacerbation of COPD is a major element that causes poor quality of life and loss of productivity. Therefore, minimizing the frequency of exacerbations is a short term treatment goal in COPD management and could improve Quality of Life (QoL) significantly in all severity groups of COPD. Although the use of spirometry for the determination of disease severity in COPD is supported by guidelines, a lung function test alone does not provide a measurement of the overall impact of COPD on health status and is not generally available especially in primary care centre. Therefore, a standardised and effective dialogue between patients and physicians in a consultation could address the impact of COPD on a patient's QoL in this situation. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT), recently launched in 2009, is a short and simple, self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the condition of patients and overall impact of COPD, and to improve patient-physician communication. It has been proven that the CAT has good repeatability and discriminative properties which suggest that it is sensitive to treatment effects at a group level. The CAT score with its better ability to assess the impact of COPD on patients, suggests potential to predict a significant change in COPD status such as acute exacerbations of COPD. Since the CAT is designed to assess the impact of COPD on the patient by measuring overall impairment, it has better correlations with other instruments, such as the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), MRC (Medical Research Council) dyspnoea scale, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ),and the 6-minute walk test. However, it does not correlate well with FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second). While the CAT shares some similarities with other questionnaires, there are several important differences. For example, the SGRQ is substantially longer than the CAT, is complex to administer and requires the use of a computer for scoring. The CAT is designed to provide a holistic measure of the impact of COPD on the patient, whereas the MRC dyspnoea scale only measures dyspnoea, and the CCQ only assesses clinical disease control. Thus, the CAT is the only validated, short and simple assessment test which can provide a holistic measure of the impact of COPD on patients, ensuring both the physicians and the patients gain the understanding needed to manage COPD optimally. QoL is defined as an individual's perception of their position in their life in the context of the culture and value systems. Therefore, the extent of understanding of the questionnaire might be influenced by language and ethnicities. Since the validation findings so far have been based on data from the US and Europe, PACE may provide better quality of data across ethnic groups given that mainly Asian subjects will participate in this study. PACE is designed to evaluate whether the CAT has a high predictive value in detecting subsequent exacerbations of COPD. If so, this result might enable both patients and physicians to better target and optimise management. The primary objective is to evaluate the predictability of the CAT to have subsequent exacerbations in COPD patients. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the predictability of the CAT to have moderate to severe exacerbations or time to the first exacerbation, to identify risk predictors for COPD exacerbations, and to evaluate correlations between CAT scores and FEV1 values, or MRC dyspnea scores. An experimental objective is to evaluate the correlation between the CAT score between 2 consecutive follow-ups (e.g. Week 8 & baseline, Week 16 & Week 8) and a COPD exacerbation over the following treatment period adjusting for demographics, MRC scores, lung function parameters, medical history, and therapy history. PACE is a multicentre, prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the predictability of the CAT score to have COPD exacerbations over 24 weeks. During the study, subjects continue taking their regular prescribed treatment. Investigators are free to make medication adjustments where required. Eligible subjects will have a clinic visit every 8 weeks, during which they will complete the CAT questionnaire, the Exacerbation Check List (ECL), MRC dyspnea scale, and spirometry. A regular phone call is placed every 8 weeks in between clinic visits to collect data for the ECL.There is no follow-up period. 550 male and female outpatient subjects will be recruited for PACE to obtain approximately 300 exacerbation events. This study will capture the winter periods in Australia, China, Korea and Taiwan, when incidence of exacerbations is at its peak. Statistical analysis will be performed on subjects' data to derive the PACE end-points.