Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of QVA149 in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

Background: The efficiency of Neural respiratory drive (NRD)expressed by a ratio of ventilation to the diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi) decreases in patients with COPD .Improving the neural respiratory drive efficiency of COPD will help to relieve the clinical symptom and make the patients feel comfort.Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV)is a good treatment to AECOPD patients.It is unknown the effects of different mode of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV) such as proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and pressure-support ventilation (PSV) on the efficiency of Neural drive of AECOPD and which mode benefit the patients more. Objective: To compare the short-term effects of mask pressure support ventilation (PSV) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV) on Neural respiratory drive in recovering patients of AECOPD

The purpose of this 12 week study is to evaluate the effects of the addition of umeclidinium bromide (62.5mcg) once-daily to fluticasone propionate (250/50mcg) twice-daily and umeclidinium bromide (125mcg) once-daily to fluticasone propionate (250/50mcg) twice-daily with placebo when added to fluticasone propionate (250/50mcg) twice-daily on lung function, COPD-related health status assessments and safety in COPD subjects.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible, and is usually progressive and associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, most commonly cigarette smoking. The disease affects not only the large central airways but also the small, more peripheral airways deeper into the lung, defined as less than 2 mm in diameter. Besides medical treatment, physiotherapy plays a major role in treatment and various methods have been suggested to remove airway of secretions. The flutter is a simple and small device shaped like a pipe that creates a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and high frequency oscillation when the expired air passes through it. These vibrations are thought to mobilise airway secretions facilitating their clearance and improving breathing. Standard blowing tests, like spirometry, where patients blow forcedly into a machine, have previously been used to investigate the efficacy of flutter devices. However, spirometry assesses the damage of larger airways but not small airways, also known as the "silent zone" which, crucially, are specifically damaged in COPD. In this study the investigators hypothesise that because the flutter helps clear the airways from the excessive thick mucus produced by COPD patients, these patients may find it easier to breathe and have lower resistance to moving air in and out of their lungs. The main objective of this study is to compare the effect of a flutter or a sham device on small airways damage using impulse oscillometry (IOS), a non-invasive method that, contrary to other common blowing tests, measures small airway resistance during normal breathing. In addition, because COPD is characterised by inflammation, the investigators would also like to measure a gas the patients blow out, nitric oxide (NO) the levels of which reflect airway inflammation. This will give to investigators an insight into the relationship between airway inflammation and small airway function.

Long-term NRT has not been studied in patients with COPD, and smokers in the United States with COPD are still asked to choose between immediate quitting or continued smoking. The purpose of this study is to see if guided maintenance therapy (GMT), using long-term NRT, might prove to be a reasonable alternative to the standard approach of asking patients to quit immediately. The investigators believe that GMT with long-term NRT will reduce overall exposure to cigarette smoke, reduce harm related to smoking, and ultimately lead to greater quit rates. In this study, 398 smokers with COPD will be randomly assigned to either receive: 1) traditional smoking cessation (SC) or 2) long-term, guided maintenance therapy with NRT (GMT). The SC intervention will be based on a standard approach to smoking cessation, including smoking cessation counseling supplemented with combination NRT (a nicotine patch plus the patient's choice of gum or lozenge) if they are willing to make a quit attempt. The GMT intervention will consist of counseling, focused on medication adherence and smoking reduction, plus 52 weeks of combination NRT. After 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment, we will compare the two treatments based on their effects on smoking cessation, number of cigarettes smoked, exposure to carbon monoxide and smoking-related carcinogens, COPD symptoms, breathing function, and smoking-related hospitalizations or death. The investigators will also analyze the data in such a way that will be able to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment. This analysis will allow patients to estimate their chances of success based on their own personal characteristics and which treatment they choose. The investigators study addresses research priorities identified in recent smoking cessation guidelines and builds upon the input of our Patient Advisory Panel and our Stakeholder Advisory Committee. This study reflects the interests expressed by smokers in prior surveys and addresses the limited reach and effectiveness of traditional approaches to smoking cessation. If our GMT approach is effective, our study could change the recommendations provided in clinical practice guidelines and change the way that insurance companies pay for smoking cessation treatment. GMT could provide an alternative for millions of smokers with COPD who are not currently benefiting from traditional approaches to smoking cessation

The effectiveness of clinic-based pulmonary rehabilitation in advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is well established, but few data exist for less severe patients treated in alternative settings. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a novel, community-based exercise program was feasible and effective for patients with moderate COPD.

About 1 million individuals in the US have a prescription for supplemental oxygen (O2). Using O2 can prolong life and increase quality of life. Patients often do not use their oxygen as prescribed, which means that they are not benefiting as much as they could be from this therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a PEer-Led O2 Infoline for patients and CAregivers (PELICAN) will increase adherence to supplemental oxygen prescription and improve health in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

This study is designed to assess the effect of QVA149 (110/50 ug q.d.) versus placebo on pulmonary function and average physical activity levels in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

This study will assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of NVA237 compared to tiotropium when added on to fluticasone/salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Dyspnea (respiratory discomfort) and activity limitation are the most common symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and contribute importantly to a perceived poor quality of life. Recent international guidelines have stressed the importance of dyspnea alleviation and improvement exercise tolerance as a means of enhancing quality of life and other long term outcomes in this population. Modern pharmacotherapy is the first step in symptom management but the overall impact of bronchodilator therapy is relatively small. Exercise training remains the most effective treatment for ameliorating dyspnea and improving exercise endurance and was the main focus of this study. The main objectives of the study were: To conduct and compare detailed studies of respiratory mechanics during cycle exercise before and after exercise training (EXT) compared with an untrained control group. By multiple regression analysis, the investigators will establish the main contributors to dyspnea relief after EXT. To compare the magnitude of change in endurance during constant work rate cycle exercise with those measured during walk tests and the endurance shuttle walk test after EXT relative to control. To evaluate which test (constant work rate cycle, six-minute walk test, or endurance shuttle walk test) is the most sensitive test for measuring changes in endurance after EXT versus control. To compare the change in standardized dyspnea ratings (Borg Scale) during constant-load cycling with a variety of other activity-related dyspnea questionnaires. To evaluate which of these measurements is the most sensitive for examining changes in perceived discomfort during exercise. To evaluate the contribution of psychological factors (anxiety, fear, respiratory panic, self-efficacy) to the perceived improvement of symptoms following EXT. The investigators will use multiple regression analysis to examine associations between changes in perceived dyspnea and changes in anxiety and self-efficacy measured by validated questionnaires and Borg intensity ratings?