Active clinical trials for "Chronic Pain"

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel approach with a motor imagery-based exercise program versus conventional rehabilitative approach in fibromyalgia syndrome (FM): reduction of pain was set as the primary outcome.

Comparison between high and low frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of myofascial chronic neck pain. The main hypothesis is that low frequency treatment will have more hypoalgesic effects than high frequency, and low frequency effects will last longer.

Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (Brief CBT-CP) is designed specifically for use in integrated care settings. The first objective of the proposed study is to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of Brief CBT-CP compared to primary care treatment as usual to assess feasibility (i.e., recruitment and retention of participants, appropriateness of measures, and assessment of fidelity of service delivery). This trial will also preliminarily assess treatment effectiveness by examining changes in pain-related physical interference, psychological distress, pain intensity, and other related outcomes. Thirty eligible participants will be randomized into either Brief CBT-CP and primary care treatment as usual or primary care treatment as usual only. Eligible Veterans will include those with chronic musculoskeletal pain and pain-related functional impairment identified from primary care. Participants assigned to Brief CBT-CP will receive six sessions of treatment in 30-minute appointments. This intervention will include education and goal setting, activities and pacing, relaxation skills, cognitive coping, and relapse prevention. Assessments will include validated self-report measures that will take place at pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment, and at 12-week follow-up. The second objective of this study will be to explore patient and provider perceptions of Brief CBT-CP to identify potential modifications that will improve its quality and overall feasibility of delivery in future work. Participants will include up to 12 staff members as well as up to 12 patients who were randomized to Brief CBT-CP. Participants will be interviewed by telephone about key components of the treatment. Participants will comment on protocol and procedures in terms of acceptability (the perception that a treatment is agreeable or that its specific components are satisfactory), appropriateness (the perceived fit or compatibility of the intervention for a given provider or consumer), and feasibility (the extent to which a new treatment can be successfully carried out or is suitable for everyday use). This intervention has clear implications for translation to clinical practice and for improving pain care quality by providing an evidence-based protocol. The potential direct benefit to Veterans includes offering a safe, accessible, non-pharmacological treatment for chronic pain early in the trajectory of care.

The broad aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the efficacy of Graded Exposure Treatment (GET Living) to target elevated pain-related fears in children with chronic pain at the Stanford Pediatric Pain Management Clinic (PPMC). The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of this intervention for children with high levels of pain-related fear and functional disability. If proven efficacious, it will allow for the dissemination of this innovative treatment model to others working with children and adolescents with chronic pain.

Chronic pain impacts a large proportion of aging people living with HIV (aPLWH) and involves factors directly related to HIV (neurotoxicity) and psychosocial co-morbidities common in aPLWH (i.e. social isolation and loneliness). The investigators hypothesize that novel interventions that acknowledge these psychosocial co-morbidities may improve the efficacy of chronic pain management and minimize the use of potentially dangerous medications. This grant proposes to adapt and pilot a pain psychotherapy approach using group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in aPLWH with chronic pain.

Effective control of chronic pain is a top priority in the United States, as approximately 10% of adults have severe chronic pain - most of which is chronic lower back pain (CLBP). However, despite the advances in neuroscience over the past 20 years, chronic pain is still largely treated with opiate narcotics, much as was done in the Civil War. In addition to the high abuse liability and dependence potential, only 30-40% of chronic pain patients declare they receive satisfactory (>50%) relief from their pain through pharmacological treatment. In these patients a common clinical practice is to escalate the dose of opiates as tolerance develops - which unfortunately has contributed to escalation in opiate overdose deaths, a resurgence of intravenous heroin use, and $55 billion in societal costs. Consequently there is a critical need for new, treatments that can treat pain and reduce reliance on opiates in individuals with chronic pain. Aim 1. Evaluate repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as a tool to dampen pain and the engagement of the Pain Network. Hypothesis 1: DLPFC TMS will attenuate the baseline brain response to pain (Pain Network activity) and increase activity in the Executive Control Network (ECN) when the patient is given instructions to 'control' the pain. Aim 2. Evaluate Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC) rTMS as a tool to dampen pain and the engagement of the Pain Network. Hypothesis 1: MPFC TMS will also attenuate the baseline brain response to pain (Pain Network activity) but will not effect the ECN or the Salience Network (SN) when the patient is given instructions to 'control' the pain.

Chronic pain has a significant impact on the physical and emotional functioning of those living with this condition. It is now recognized that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an effective treatment in managing chronic pain; however, several barriers limit its accessibility. Therefore, self-help versions of ACT are promising because they offer a cost-effective treatment option that usually require little support from a therapist, and can be widely accessed. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of predominantly self-help ACT interventions (web-based and bibliotherapy programs) in comparison to an education intervention among adults living with chronic pain. The current study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two experimental groups and an active control group. The first experimental group received access to an internet platform with videos, interactive content and exercises based on ACT. The second experimental group received a copy of a self-help book based on ACT for chronic pain and had access to this book's website which includes audio mindfulness exercises. The third group consisted of an active control group, in which participants received pamphlet style pdf documents of education for pain (without any ACT components) as well as related practical exercises.

The investigators have developed a three component intervention to support shared decision-making during the early recovery phase for older adults who present to the emergency department (ED) or orthopedic urgent care with acute musculoskeletal pain. The first component is a brief interactive video to enhance patient knowledge and self-efficacy regarding treatment options with the intent of facilitating conversations between patients and emergency providers. The second component is a protocol-guided phone conversation (telecare) between a nurse care manager and the patient at 48-72 hours following discharge to assess pain severity and interference with daily activities, review analgesic use and side effects and recovery-promoting behaviors, and discuss adjustments to the patients treatment. The third component is communication with the patient's primary care provider following the telecare call to inform them of the patient's condition and treatment plan and encourage primary care followup. The short-term objective of this project is to test the efficacy of this intervention to reduce the transition from acute to chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults and obtain data to inform implementation. The investigators will conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial with adults aged 50 years and older who present to the ED or orthopedic urgent care with acute musculoskeletal pain. Patients will be randomized to (1) the full intervention (video + telecare + communication with primary provider), (2) video alone, or (3) usual care. The primary outcome will be pain, measured longitudinally over the course of the year following the acute care visit. Secondary outcomes will include physical function, analgesic side effects and adverse events, opioid use, depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep duration and quality, and healthcare utilization at one, three, six, and twelve months. Secondary analyses will (1) examine whether the intervention has its effect by promoting shared decision-making, and (2) estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The long-term goal of this work is to develop, test, and implement interventions that improve long-term health outcomes for older adults with acute musculoskeletal pain.

Long-term pain affects one-third of the United Kingdom population and can be very disabling. People experiencing long-term pain often suffer from disturbed sleep because of their pain symptoms, and disturbed sleep can then make their pain symptoms worse. Managing long-term pain is also very costly to the National Health Service. The most common treatment is prescribed medicines, but these do not always work and can have serious side-effects for some patients. The investigators have been developing an alternative approach for treating long-term pain. This approach uses simple non-invasive tools to promote some kinds of brain activity over others. It involves patients using headphones to listen to some specific sounds, or a headset with lights flashing at particular frequencies. The studies undertaken so far seem to show that doing this can change how the brain responds to pain. It potentially offers an inexpensive yet effective way of reducing pain and improving sleep for patients with long-term pain. There are a few small studies that support this approach and more work is needed. The next step is to find out whether these tools can be reliably used in home settings, how people feel about using this approach, and to gather information to design a larger trial of this technology. Therefore the aim of this study is to test the suitability and acceptability of these home-based tools with individuals with long-term pain. Up to 30 participants with long-term pain and pain-related sleep disturbance will use the tools for at least 20 minutes at bed time every day for 4 weeks. The investigators will interview them to ask about their experiences of using the tools, and their feedback and suggestions on how the approach should be developed. The investigators will measure changes in the nature of participants' pain, sleep, fatigue and mood. These findings will inform the planning and design of a future much larger study to test this technology. The investigators will make sure that findings from this study are shared widely within the National Health Service and beyond among patient groups, professionals, charities, specialist centres and commissioners.

The goal of this study is to determine whether comprehensive perioperative administration of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine can increase postoperative pain tolerance and reduce opiate consumption in chronic back pain patients undergoing spinal laminectomy/fusion when compared to placebo Opioid dependence will be defined as daily opioid use (2 or more doses per day) for a period of two-months or longer. Intraoperatively, patients will receive a 1 mg/kg dose of intravenous ketamine or saline with 15 minutes after induction of general anesthesia. Thereafter, a continuous infusion of 0.20 mg/kg/hr ketamine with a maximum dose of 20 mg/hr or saline will be run to conclude at 24 hours after the end of the surgery (fascial closure). The primary outcome measure will be hydromorphone PCA usage during the first 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures will be VAS pain scores at rest and with movement in PACU, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, 2 week (post-op visit), 6 week follow-up visit, as well as, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and emotional distress surveys assessing depression and anxiety at preop/screening, postop and 6 week follow-up (PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form, PROMIS Emotional Distress-Depression Short Form), as well as a Neuro-QOL Short Form v1.1 - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities .