Active clinical trials for "Pain, Postoperative"

Our study will compare the use of continuous saphenous nerve block performed at the adductor canal in addition to Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) versus a Sham block in addition to LIA for total knee replacement. The investigators hypothesize that the saphenous nerve block performed at the level of the adductor canal in addition to LIA provides better pain relief than the LIA alone without significantly compromising muscle strength and physiotherapy, enabling patients to mobilize early with reduced opioid consumption and les side effects. The investigators will enroll a total of 40 patients (20 patients will receive continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA and 20 will receive the sham block and LIA). Until discharge, the investigators will record patients' pain scores, opioid consumption, side effects and physical therapy progress. If our study proves that the continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA can effectively reduce postoperative pain scores to an acceptable level with better physical therapy progress and less opioid consumption, it could be seen as a more attractive alternative to LIA alone or other traditionally used methods of postoperative pain control that compromises muscle strength and physiotherapy.

Total knee arthroplasty is amongst the most painful procedures postoperatively, and pain management can be a challenge. Different measures have been introduced to manage severe postoperative pain int hese patients. Previous studies have investigated gabapentin in acute postoperative pain and demonstrated reducted pain, postoperative morphine consumption, morphine related side effects, and postoperative pain scores. To date, this analgesia adjunct has yet to be investigated in total joint arthroplasty patients.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine if CR845 is effective in treating the pain associated with a laparoscopic hysterectomy.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if multiple postoperative administrations with a solution of ropivacaine, ketorolac and epinephrine into the operating field through a catheter would affect morphine consumption. Secondary end-points are pain intensity, side effects and length of stay.

The purpose of the study is to determine if the administration of a mix of Sufentanil and Morphine in intrathecal is a better analgesia regimen than PCA alone in patient post-VATS.

To test if multimodal analgesia with different analgesic medication offer better pain relief, lesser side effects and is safe compared to conventionel opiod analgesia after cardiac surgery.

Abdominal wall incisions used for liver surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain and disability. Epidural analgesia is often contraindicated in these patients due to common bleeding problems. Furthermore, drugs such as acetaminophen and opioids are often inadequate and can lead to detrimental side-effects. Abdominal wall (AW) catheters can be placed during surgical closure along the incision line and can be used to administer local anesthetics for postoperative pain. The study is a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial involving 120 patients undergoing elective liver surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to AW catheter group treated with drug or control treated with saline. Treatment group will receive AW catheters with ropivacaine plus standard patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Control group will obtain AW with normal saline and no local anesthetics and PCA. Patients are followed for 6 months post-operatively for pain scores, side-effects, chronic pain and complications.

This study has been designed as a controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of brief lidocaine infusion, brief ketamine infusion and a lidocaine/ketamine combined infusion when added to conventional opioid therapy following major spine surgery, as well as to evaluate the effects of the lidocaine/ketamine pain protocol on the feasibility of performing routine intraoperative neurophysiology during spine surgery in adults and determine whether this infusion protocol is compatible with intraoperative neurophysiology on spine surgery patients. If one or more of the approaches is confirmed as efficacious and safe, it could have a significant impact on the routine management of postoperative pain in this context.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system to tramadol/acetaminophen.

Many hospitalized patients experience pain during their hospital stay, and less than half report adequate pain relief. Common treatments for pain include opioid medications, which have associated side effects and complications. Research has shown that acupuncture is effective for surgical, postoperative and cancer-related pain, nausea, and vomiting. More research is needed on the effectiveness of adding acupuncture to routine care for hospitalized patients. The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture delivered in a "real-world" setting according to the principles of traditional Chinese medicine among hospitalized patients to manage pain and other symptoms. 250 hospitalized participants will be randomized in a 1 to 1 ratio to receive either 1) usual care or 2) usual care with acupuncture offered (125 in each group). The primary outcome measure will be change in daily pain intensity. Data on other symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, anxiety, and depression, as well as functionality and quality of life will be collected in person, on a web-based survey, or via telephone follow-up. The aims of the study are to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture to manage pain and other symptoms among hospitalized patients; to evaluate the impact of acupuncture on patient satisfaction among hospitalized patients; and to estimate costs and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture among a subset of hospitalized patients. The investigators hypothesize that compared to hospitalized patients receiving usual care alone, hospitalized patients receiving acupuncture will have: decreased pain severity higher patient satisfaction