Active clinical trials for "Renal Insufficiency, Chronic"

Objective: To verify the efficacy and safety of denosumab in the prevention and treatment of CKD-MBD in CKD patients with high risk of fracture. Methods: A cohort of CKD patients with high risk of fracture was established and followed up for long periods (≥24 months). Patients with CKD3b-5D stage and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) scores at high risk or very high risk of fracture were enrolled. A multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled, interventional study was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups. The patients in the denosumab group received subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg once every 6 months, and the patients in the non-denosumab group received conventional treatment. Bone metabolic markers (serum calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, alkaline phosphatase, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, osteocalcin, total N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, etc.), bone mineral density (dual-energy X-ray, quantitative CT), and vascular calcification score were regularly monitored. All adverse events (all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac events, fracture, hospitalization, emergency department visits, etc.) were recorded during the follow-up period. Bone mineral density and clinical parameters were compared between the two groups.

In the treatment of heart failure (HF), SGLT-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) can significantly improve the clinical outcome and quality of life related to HF. The current data show that SGLT-2i is effective and safe in improving HF outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4, but there is little clinical evidence in patients with eGFR<20 ml/min/1.73 m2. Therefore, our research is designed to confirm that SGLT-2i can improve the outcome of HF in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and severe chronic renal insufficiency (eGFR<20ml/min/1.73m2).

There is wide evidence regarding the weak points of end-stage Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in hemodialysis, and they include three intervention aspects: exercise, nutrition and psychological support. Evidence shows that exercise for patients in hemodialysis results in increased survival rate, functional capacity, strength and health-related quality of life. Additionally, different studies have shown the benefits of psychological interventions and the positive effect of educational programs on nutritional care for patients in hemodialysis. Despite the well-known benefits of exercise, this kind of programs are not being implemented in the routine clinical care of hemodialysis patients. Thus, the GoodRENal project aims to promote healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients in a holistic approach that combines exercise, nutrition and psychological wellbeing plus cognitive functioning addressing adult learners. The project will, in phase 1, explore barriers and facilitators of patients, carers and health professionals towards healthy lifestyle (physical activity, nutrition and psychological well being). In phase 2, the project will develop a health virtual platform including these three dimensions of cares. In summary, the project outputs will be: A didactic content in a modular platform to create an educational program for integrated treatments in patients with dialysis A guideline to promote healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients for health care providers A guideline to promote e healthy lifestyles among dialysis patients for patients and formal - nonformal carers

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy (including durability) of up to 2 REACT injections given 3 months (+30 days) apart and delivered percutaneously into biopsied and non-biopsied contralateral kidneys in participants with T2DM and CKD.

Background: Emerging data favors aortic blood pressure (BP) over brachial cuff BP in predicting CV and renal complications, as this BP directly impacts the heart, brain and kidneys. In parallel, central BP measuring devices have been developed that are more accurate towards aortic BP and easy to use without training. In no other condition than advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is BP control as important, since undertreatment is associated with adverse CV events and progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), while overtreatment similarly leads to adverse CV events and injurious falls but also acute kidney injury which can precipitate ESKD. To this day, standard BP management relies on brachial cuff BP, which is an imprecise surrogate marker of aortic BP, more so in the advanced CKD population. Considering that these patients have a high risk of CV morbidity and mortality and is a group where brachial BP may be the least reliable, it can be beneficial to manage hypertension in this population using central BP measurements. With the development of affordable and easy to use central BP devices, routine use of central BP in hypertension would now become a reality. However, the superiority of central BP to traditional brachial cuff BP in regard to clinical outcomes will first need to be demonstrated. Objectives: To demonstrate that targeting central BP in advanced CKD patients as opposed to brachial cuff BP is feasible and results in lower arterial stiffness after 12 months of follow-up. Methods: The CENTRAL-CKD trial is an investigator-initiated prospective parallel-group 1:1 randomized double-blinded multicenter pragmatic pilot trial. Patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 (n=116) will be randomized to either a central systolic BP target < 130 mmHg (intervention) or brachial systolic BP target < 130 mmHg (standard care). Central and brachial BP will be concomitantly measured, with treating physicians, patients and investigators blinded towards allocation. As this trial is of a pragmatic design, all other aspects of BP and CKD management, including anti-hypertensive treatment-related decisions, diastolic BP targets, and clinical and laboratory follow-ups will be at the discretion of the attending Nephrologist. The primary outcomes include feasibility of large-scale trial using prespecified criteria and aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) at 12 months. Other cardiovascular, renal, quality of life and safety outcomes will be evaluated. Importance: CENTRAL-CKD is designed as a pilot trial aimed at providing the framework and justification to proceed to a large-scale trial with adequate power to detect the impact of the proposed intervention on clinically important outcomes.

Metabolic acidosis is a common problem that occurs with worsening chronic kidney disease. Dietary acid can build up when the kidneys are not working well. This can be associated with a higher risk of worsening kidney function and death. The usual treatment is a medication called sodium bicarbonate which works to balance the acids in the body. The medication however often does not work and causes side effects. Consumption of alkalizing fruit and vegetables may work as a treatment for metabolic acidosis. This trial is being done to see if fruit and vegetables, provided via home delivery, can become a viable management for metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

The purpose of this study is to establish if concomitant renal and vascularized urinary bladder allograft transplantation is feasible.

The aim of this Phase 2 study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the live biotherapeutic product, KT-301 (formerly US-APR2020), in the management of patients with CKD Stage IV.

This study is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with chronic kidney disease.

As chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase worldwide, along with the demand for related life-saving therapies, the financial burden of CKD will place an increasing drain on health care systems. Experimental studies showed that glomerular capillary hypertension and impaired sieving function with consequent protein overload play a pathogenic role in the progression of CKD. Consistently, human studies show that proteinuria is an independent predictor of progression and that its reduction is renoprotective. At comparable BP control, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), including angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), more effectively than non-RAS inhibitor therapy reduce proteinuria, slow progression to ESRD, and even improve the kidney function achieving disease regression in some cases. In participants with diabetes, RAS inhibitors delay the onset of microalbuminuria and its progression to macroalbuminuria, and ACE inhibitors may reduce the excess cardiovascular mortality associated with diabetic renal disease. In addition to RAS inhibitors, however, multimodal approaches including lifestyle modifications and multidrug therapy will be required in most cases to optimize control of the several risk factors for CKD and related cardiovascular morbidity. Novel medications, including proximal tubular sodium - glucose co-transporter -2 (SGLT2 inhibitors - that ameliorate glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria and slow renal disease progression in type 2 diabetes by mechanisms apparently independent of improved metabolic control - might help further improve the cost-effectiveness of renoprotective interventions even in non-diabetic CKD. This phase 2, prospective, randomized, cross over, placebo-controlled trial will primarily aim to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin ameliorates hyperfiltration and reduces proteinuria as compared to placebo in patients with non-diabetic CKD, with particular focus on those at highest risk of progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD) because of severe renal insufficiency (Stage IV CKD) and proteinuria (>0.5 g/24 hours).