Active clinical trials for "Shock"

Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) a severe condition with high morbidity and mortality results from the hosts overwhelming inflammatory response and cytokine storm. Staphylococcal superantigen toxins are the main causative agents. Toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) being responsible for almost all of menstruation associated and more than 50% of all other cases. There is no specific therapy. The Phase I study BioMed0713 demonstrated the safety and tolerability of the BioMed recombinant toxic shock syndrome toxin (rTSST-1) Variant Vaccine in healthy adults. The aim of this amendment is to demonstrate prolonged safety of the BioMed rTSST-1 Variant Vaccine and to assess persistence of antibodies generated in participants. The second aim of the study is to assess boosterability of the BioMed rTSST-1 Variant Vaccine.

Objective Evaluating the safety and efficacy of iloprost and eptifibatide co-administration compared to placebo as an addition to standard care in septic shock patients. Trial rationale Iloprost and eptifibatide combination therapy in septic shock patients is expected to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity, reduce formation of microvascular thrombosis and dissolve existing clots in the microcirculation and maintain platelet counts, thereby improving platelet-mediated immune function and reducing the risk of bleeding. Together this is expected to translate into reduced organ failure and improved outcome in patients with septic shock. Trial population The trial population is patients >18 years admitted to the ICU with septic shock within the last 24h. Eighteen evaluable septic shock patients will be included. Trial design This is a single center, randomized (2:1, active:placebo), placebo controlled, double-blind investigator-initiated phase IIa trial in patients with septic shock, investigating the safety and efficacy of co-administration of Iloprost and Eptifibatide as a 48h continuous i.v infusion in totally 18 patients. All patients will receive standard ICU care including LMWH thrombosis prophylaxis. As all patients present at the trial site in an acute, critical condition, scientific guardians will co-sign the informed consent form before inclusion. Next-of-kin and the patients' general practitioner will co-sign as soon as possible and the patient will provide informed consent whenever possible. The active treatment is expected to improve the clinical condition of the individual patient and to provide information that may translate into improved therapy of future sepsis patients. During the study, blood samples will be taken at different time points. Patients will be observed and assessed continuously with regards to complications including bleeding. Patients will be actively assessed as long as the patient is in the ICU. During the extended follow up period at day 30 and 90, contact will be made with the patients to follow up on safety events and vital status. The trial is conducted in accordance with the protocol and the current regulatory requirements and legislation in Denmark. Investigational product The active treatment in the trial comprises co-administration of 1 ng/kg/min Ilomedin® and 0.5 µg/kg/min Integrilin® as 48h continuous i.v infusions. The drugs will be purchased and administered according to the product specifications. Placebo The placebo in the trial is 0.9% saline as 48h continuous i.v infusion, which will be used as placebo for both study drugs. The i.v volume of placebo saline to be administered is equal to the administered volume of diluted (in 0.9% saline) active drug. Data protection In compliance with the Danish data protection law, the trial will be approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Sponsor of study and financial support This research project is investigator-initiated by the trial sponsor and co-investigator Sisse R. Ostrowski and co-investigator Pär I. Johansson in collaboration with the principal investigator Morten Bestle. It has not received funding from any commercial sponsors. Time line Patient recruitment period runs from September 2014 to August 2015. Follow-up data on 30-day and 90-day outcome and adverse events will be collected. Initial data analyses will be done after completion of 30-day follow-up for all patients. Secondary data analyses will be done after completion of 90-day follow-up for all patients.

Dexmedetomidine was found might be beneficial to sepsis. Dexmedetomidine were found to improve microcirculation in sepsis animal studies and non-sepsis patients. However, the effect of dexmedetomidine on microcirculation in septic shock patients is unknown.

This is a prospective, multi-centric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled phase-III efficacy clinical study of PMZ-2010 therapy in patients with hypovolemic shock. Centhaquine (previously used names, centhaquin and PMZ-2010; International Non-proprietary Name (INN) recently approved by WHO is centhaquine) has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit and swine models of hemorrhagic shock, it decreased blood lactate, increased mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and decreased mortality. An increase in cardiac output during resuscitation is mainly attributed to an increase in stroke volume. Centhaquine acts on the venous α2B-adrenergic receptors and enhances venous return to the heart, in addition, it produces arterial dilatation by acting on central α2A-adrenergic receptors to reduce sympathetic activity and systemic vascular resistance.

Although norepinephrine is commonly used and is the recommended agent for the treatment of hypotension in volume-resuscitated hyperdynamic septic shock, Low doses of vasopressin may be added to norepinephrine to maintain arterial blood pressure in refractory septic shock and to decrease exposure to norepinephrine. The aim of the work is to compare the effect of norepinephrine alone and Norepinephrine/vasopressin combination on hemodynamics and tissue perfusion in septic shock patients.

Cardiogenic shock is a serious medical condition with high mortality and morbidity. This trial assesses safety, tolerability and efficacy of Adrecizumab on top of standard of care in patients with cardiogenic shock.

in this study the investigators aim to assess the role of using dexmedetomidine as sedative in septic shock patients in comparison with midazolam. The investigators aim to assess the effect on immune response and inflammatory mediators and effect on vasopressors.

Spasticity is the most common motor disorder in cerebral palsy (CP). The objectives of his therapeutic approach include; reducing pain, ease of use of orthopedic aids, improving posture, minimizing contractures and deformity, and facilitating mobility and dexterity, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the potential of the patient and promoting their independence and quality of life. The approach to spasticity in CP is complex and presents itself as a great challenge for the rehabilitation team. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has been established in recent years as an effective, non-invasive alternative with hardly any side effects (small bruises or discomfort during the application) for the management of spasticity in patients with CP. rESWT is a relatively new therapy in the field of neurology, in 2010 was published the first clinical trial where shock waves were applied for the management of spasticity in patients with CP. Currently, few works have studied the efficacy of rESWT in patients with CP. In all of them, the results demonstrated the treatment's effectiveness in reducing spasticity locally in people with CP up to 3 months after the application. The group most studied muscle has been the Triceps Surae, and there is a great disparity regarding the doses of treatment applied in each study, especially regarding the number of sessions and the time interval between sessions. The most widely used protocol is 3 rESWT sessions with a time interval of 1 week between session; This protocol was established as the most effective in the treatment of trauma pathology. Despite all the variability in the administration of the dose, we have been able to observe that none of them has studied the effect of rESWT by lengthening the time interval between sessions beyond one week to check whether the therapeutic effects on spasticity can be prolonged over time by applying the same dose. Most of the studies conclude that future research should be aimed at studying the most optimal dose of treatment as well as evaluating the long-term results.

This open-label, randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effect of a fixed dose of terlipressin added to usual care vs. usual care alone on renal perfusion in patients with septic shock.

this study is conducted to evaluate the role of the novel triple therapy combination in reducing the mortality rate, reducing the shock time, and reversal of organ damage. the study includes two arms, the first arm is the control which received hydrocortisone monotherapy and the second arm is the intervention arm which received the triple therapy regimen. calculation of 28 days in-hospital mortality is the primary outcome. shock time, vasopressor doses, infection markers, and organ function tests are the secondary outcomes. the data will be analyzed by student t-test or Mann Whitney test, Fischer exact or chi-square test for numbers, repeated measures ANOVA will be used to consider confounders and other parameters, mortality will be expressed by Kaplan Meier and ROC curve. For Multivariate analysis of repeated quantitative outcomes, linear mixed models were used to quantify the relationship between one dependent variable (SOFA, SCr, doses of vasopressors) and many independent variables including group type and sepsis phenotype adjusted to other clinical and demographic factors.