Active clinical trials for "Shock"

Volume resuscitation is the mainstay of treatment in most types of shock, especially in hemorrhagic and septic shock. Septic shock is a main cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although there has been a lot of research to evaluate optimal amount and composition of fluids for volume resuscitation (e.g. colloids, crystalloids, red blood cell transfusion, albumin, fresh frozen plasma) particularly in the past decade, results remain inconclusive and to some extent contradictive. The investigators would like to contribute to the establishment of new endpoints for the guidance of shock therapy focusing on the first 24 and 48 hours, amending the currently used parameters (i.e. cardiac output, heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure) with new measurements (see study specific measurements). The goal is to decrease the need for renal replacement therapy, thereby eventually reducing patient morbidity and mortality.

This is a Phase I open label dose escalation trial of human allogeneic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the treatment of septic shock. The main purpose of the study is to assess the safety of MSCs in patients with septic shock.

The consecutive patients admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS and full filling all the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in 1:1 ration by the process of randomization.- The study is an open level study. The investigators will strictly follow the randomization table to give therapy as per the intervention arm. Intervention:-the therapeutic intervention is vasopressor i.e. noradrenaline alone and terlipressin along with noradrenaline to maintain the MAP >65mm Hg. Intervention arm Arm (A) - Noradrenaline Arm (B) - Noradrenaline + low dose terlipressin

This is a randomised, double-blind, two-stage, placebo controlled study. It is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 3 doses of MOTREM versus placebo in adult patients with septic shock.

The Purpose of this study is to determine the impact of balanced salt solution versus chloride rich solution on clinical outcomes in paediatric severe sepsis or septic shock

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome which infection trigger systemic inflammatory response. Uncontrolled inflammatory process leads to multiple organ dysfunction and cause early mortality in severe sepsis. Unfractionated heparin is an anticoagulant that widely used either for DVT prophylaxis or treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Heparin also have an anti-inflammatory effect through downregulates nuclear factor kappa B and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Aim of this study is to determine effects of low dose unfractionated heparin treatment on inflammation in severe sepsis patient.

The purpose of this trial is to o assess feasibility of a protocol comparing conservative (trigger guided) vs. liberal (target guided) approach to fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock after initial fluid resuscitation.

The purpose of this randomized, comparative, open and multi-centre study is to show that two sessions of hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin performed within maximum 36 hours after the surgery of a peritonitis by hollow organ perforation reduce the mortality in patients suffering from septic shock.

MP4OX is a novel oxygen therapeutic agent being developed as an ischemic rescue therapy to enhance perfusion and oxygenation of tissues at risk during hemorrhagic shock. MP4OX is a pegylated hemoglobin-based colloid. Due to its molecular size and unique oxygen dissociation characteristics, MP4OX targets delivery of oxygen to ischemic tissues. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of MP4OX treatment in trauma patients suffering from lactic acidosis due to severe hemorrhagic shock. The study hypothesis is that MP4OX will reverse the lactic acidosis by enhancing perfusion and oxygenation of ischemic tissues and thereby prevent and reduce the duration of organ failure and improve outcome in these patients.

Primary Aim: To determine the feasibility and safety of hypotensive resuscitation for the early treatment of patients with traumatic shock compared to standard fluid resuscitation. Primary Hypotheses: The null hypothesis regarding feasibility is that hypotensive resuscitation will result in the same volume of early crystalloid (normal saline) fluid administration compared to standard crystalloid resuscitation. The null hypothesis regarding safety is that hypotensive resuscitation will result in the same percent of patients surviving to 24 hours after 911 call received at dispatch compared to standard fluid resuscitation. Early resuscitation is defined as all fluid given until 2 hours after arrival in the Emergency Department or until hemorrhage control is achieved in the hospital, whichever occurs earlier.