Active clinical trials for "Shock"

Anaphylaxis is an acute serious allergic reaction, with multi-organ system manifestations caused by the release of chemical mediators and it is potentially fatal . Between 5% and 14% of patients may experience a recurrence of anaphylaxis 8-12 hours after the initial presentation, called biphasic (late-phase) . The mainstay of treatment for children experiencing anaphylaxis remains adrenaline and H1-antihistamines. Corticosteroids are not life-saving and do not have an immediate effect on the symptoms of anaphylaxis but may help reduce or prevent a biphasic "late phase" reaction . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral glucocorticoids in prevention of the second phase or biphasic reaction of anaphylaxis, as compared to placebo in children, presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PEC Al-Sadd) with mild to moderate anaphylaxis (Prospective Study). Patients will be randomized to either one of the two treatment: Treatment 1: Dexamethasone 0.6mg/kg oral. Treatment 2 : Placebo All patients will be urgently treated for anaphylaxis according to guideline protocol. Enrolled patients will be given one of the study medications orally, and he /she will observe in the observation room with cardiac monitor and close monitoring by nurse. The treating physician will discharge patient when he/she looks well, breathing comfortably, has oxygen saturation >94%, stable blood pressure and no gastrointestinal or neurological manifestation. Discharge patients will be sent home on anti-histamine (cetirizine) for 5days. All patients will be followed up for one week post discharge by a phone call asking about the general condition, relapse of symptoms, or need for readmission.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of low dose corticosteroid therapy (hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone) in the treatment of adult cardiogenic shock.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) accounts for 15% of all myocardial infarctions and its mortality rate approaches that of large vessel myocardial infarction, but there are currently no effective treatment options. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is an important mechanism of MINOCA and is closely related to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The prospective trial aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) in the treatment of Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), and to expand the scope of clinical indications for CSWT and provide new treatment strategy for MINOCA.

In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin storm and cytokine storm are the main causes of patients with septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction. Endotoxins are the main mediators of gram-negative bacteria causing systemic inflammation and sepsis. Endotoxins can interact with Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) binding and trigger cytokine storms. The triple-effect blood purification filter has been proven to remove endotoxins, cytokines and urinary toxins, and it has the opportunity to improve shock in patients with sepsis. We hypothesize that blood purification using the three-effect filter can shorten the duration and severity of shock in patients with severe septic shock and reduce the organ damage by removing endotoxin, cytokine and urinary toxins. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of blood purification using the three-effect filter on shortening the duration of septic shock. Other exploratory variables include the reduction of severity of organ damage and other clinical outcomes and prognosis.

New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is reported in 40 % of patients with septic shock and is associated with hemodynamic alterations and mortality. The lack of consensus regarding best practices for the management of NOSVA in this setting has led to major variations in practice patterns. Observational studies reported three usual strategies: (i) heart rate control (hereafter rate control) with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on low dose of amiodarone, (ii) rhythm control with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on high dose of amiodarone, and electrical cardioversionand (iii) modifiable NOSVA risk factors control (hereafter risk control) without using antiarrhythmic drugs. Risk control would minimize adverse events of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rhythm control would rapidly improve haemodynamics via restoring diastole and decreasing cardiac metabolic demand, while minimizing exposure to anticoagulation. Rate control, would limit potential adverse events of high dose of amiodarone and of electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation), while controlling haemodynamics. Therefore, it seems important to compare these three strategies. Our hypothesis is dual: first, that rate control and rhythm control each improve hemodynamics with in fine a decreased mortality, as compared to a risk control; second, that rhythm control outperforms rate control in this setting. This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of these three strategies (risk control, rate control and rhythm control) for NOSVA during septic shock.

Severe sepsis and septic shock remain of particular gravity in children with a current mortality of about 20 % , despite the international prevention campaigns " survival sepsis campaign ". Septic shock associates a macrocirculatory and a microcirculatory dysfunction. The volume expansion remains the treatment of severe sepsis at the initial phase supplemented by the use of vasopressors and / or inotropes. Nevertheless , it is essential to predict the fluid responsiveness after volemic expansion because fluid overload is associated with an increased morbidity in children. In studies , the volume expansion is considered effective if it allows an increase in cardiac output of more than 15 % compared to the basal level. However, their conditions of use remain very restrictive and not applicable to most of our patients ( tidal volume ≥ 7ml / kg , PEEP sufficient , absence of cardiac arrhythmia and effective sedation ) . To date , no index can be used for all patients with invasive mechanical ventilation. It therefore seems appropriate to develop new tests to predict the response to volume expansion in children with septic shock hospitalized in pediatric intensive care. A recent study has validated a test to predict the response to volume expansion in adults: injection of a mini-bolus of 50 ml of saline over 10s. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of mini bolus fluid to predict response to fluid expansion in pediatric septic shock.

This study will investigate the role of a portable Continues Positive Airway Pressure device (pCPAP) in management of patients with symptomatic Excessive Central Airway Collapse (ECAC). ECAC is characterised by complete or partial collapse of central airways on exhalation. In some cases, this can cause persistent breathlessness and severely limited exercise capacity. Current treatment options for ECAC are very limited. Standard assistive breathing devices such as CPAP machines are sometimes used to relieve symptoms at night or at rest. This does not address breathlessness during activity which drives accumulation of disability over time. The main aims of this project are to assess the effect of a portable CPAP (pCPAP) device on exercise capacity and symptoms and evaluate the feasibility of wearing pCPAP at home during routine activities. Lightweight battery-powered portable CPAP devices have been recently developed to facilitate travel to remote areas by people with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). Patients with ECAC can wear them during physical activity to prevent airway collapse but their potential benefits have not been evaluated in clinical trials. For this study, the investigators will recruit 20 patients with ECAC who will attend for two study visits 4-6 weeks apart in a single centre (The Royal Papworth Hospital). The primary outcome measure will be a shuttle walk test performed repeatedly with and without pCPAP in a randomised order. Secondary outcomes will include assessment of activity level, breathlessness, quality of life ,pCPAP usage and its acceptability. The study will evaluate a pragmatic way of CPAP titration and application. Previously acquired diagnostic baseline computed tomography (CT) scans will be analysed with a novel Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI) tool. This software tool will enable retrospective reflections on the changes occurring within the lungs for patients with ECAC. This may help identify predictive features of potential pCPAP responders and inform future use.

Norepinephrine was recommended as the first vasopressor for septic shock resuscitation. For the patient who did not response to high dose norepinephrine, epinephrine was recommended. Vasopressin was also recommended as an alternative vasopressor, in case patient did not response to norepinephrine and or epinephrine. Terlipressin, a selective V1 receptor binding with long half life, was reported that it main action is to increase blood pressure via the different mechanism from norepinephrine and epinephrine. To use terlipressin, combine with norepinephrine and or epinephrine among refractory septic shock, could decrease the usage dose of norepinephrine and epinephrine as well as lower the side effects of too high adrenergic stimuli.

Cardiogenic shock (CGS) affects up to 10% of patients suffering acute coronary syndrome. It has a 30 day mortality of 45-50%. No pharmacological nor intervention/device trials have had any impact on this mortality in the last 20 years. The EURO SHOCK Trial (supported by the European Union Horizons 2020 programme) will randomise 428 patients with CGS following acute coronary syndrome from 44 EU centres to early intervention with Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) therapy or to standard treatment (with no ECMO). This intervention is a high cost specialist centre procedure that warrants further investigation including economic appraisal. Multiple mechanistic and hypothesis generating sub-studies will be undertaken.

Despite promising observational and phase 1 data, the therapeutic potential of vitamin C for the management of septic shock has not borne out in recent large multi-centre randomized controlled trials. There is biological plausibility for benefit with intravenous vitamin C, and the investigators hypothesize that the doses used in these trials were insufficient to demonstrate an effect. High-dose vitamin C has been trialed in patients with cancer and burns and proven to be safe. The investigators have recently demonstrated a dramatic benefit of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in reversing organ dysfunction in a large mammalian model of sepsis. The proposed prospective interventional study will be the first to administer high-dose intravenous vitamin C in critically ill patients with sepsis. The objectives of this study will be to determine whether high-dose intravenous vitamin C (i) reduces vasopressor requirement in critically ill patients with septic shock (ii) reverses organ dysfunction and (iii) is well tolerated.