Active clinical trials for "Shock"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients following blunt traumatic injury with hypovolemic shock, who receive either lactated ringer's solution or hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) resuscitation; also, to focus specifically on neurologic outcome in patients with brain injury and on the effect of HSD resuscitation on inflammatory cell responsiveness.

Patients requiring high dose pressors (minimum 2) who are unlikely to be weaned off them over 1 day will be identified. Patients will have the device applied to one hand while expectant medical management will continue to the contralateral hand.

The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of a portable ventilator generating positive end-expiratory pressure on exercise tolerance in patients with Excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) and tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the 30-day mortality outcome of the septic shock patients who are treated with ultrasound-assisted fluid management using change of the inferior vene cava (IVC) diameter during respiratory phases in the first 6 hours compared with those treated with "usual-care" strategy.

The purpose of the SQUEEZE Trial is to determine which fluid resuscitation strategy results in the best outcomes for children treated for suspected or confirmed septic shock. In this study, eligible children will be randomized to either the 'Usual Care Arm' or the 'Fluid Sparing Arm'. Children will receive treatment according to current ACCM Septic Shock Resuscitation Guidelines, with the assigned resuscitation strategy used to guide administration of further fluid boluses as well as the timing of initiation and escalation of vasoactive medications to achieve ACCM recommended hemodynamic targets.

Objective To investigate whether critical care ultrasound oriented shock management in shock patients in intensive care unit(ICU) can improve outcome. Methods Randomized controlled research. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the critical care ultrasound oriented shock management group (CUSS group), treatment was oriented by the findings of critical care ultrasound in each shock phase, while in the control group the decisions about the monitoring and management were made by the clinical team. The goal of treatments in both groups were decreasing lactate by 20% or more per 2 hours for the Optimization phase in shock management, and no increase lactate level when removing the fluid in de-escalation phase. The primary outcome measure were hospital mortality and 28-day mortality, the secondary outcome measure were the length of ventilation and the length of ICU stay.

Echocardiography (cardiac ultrasound) is being used more often in the critical care setting for management of severe infection (septic shock). Early studies show echocardiography to be useful in these patients, but at this time, there are no good clinical trials to justify its use. Our study goals/objectives are as follows: To conduct an unblinded, two-group randomized controlled clinical trial to compare an echocardiography-guided resuscitation protocol with an Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) protocol in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Demonstrate that a sepsis treatment protocol using transthoracic echocardiography and other non-invasive assessments of cardiac output will result in more rapid resolution of septic shock compared to invasive EGDT. Demonstrate patients receiving the non-invasive echocardiography protocol will receive less administration of intravenous fluid.

The purpose of this study is to find out whether stress doses of hydrocortisone attenuate coagulation dysfunction in patients with septic shock. And discuss the probable mechanism by which little doses of hydrocortisone influence coagulation system in sepsis.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to compare Vitamin C versus placebo for patients presenting to the ICU with a diagnosis of septic shock.

Anaphylaxis is a hypersensitivity reaction systemic, generalized, severe, life-threatening that may result from exposure to a triggering factor. The prevalence of anaphylaxis is 0.05 to 2% in the general population. Most reactions appear within 30 minutes after contact with the triggering factor and last up to 6 hours. The main triggering factors are: 1/food, 2/hymenopteran bites, 3/drugs. The main treatment is the early administration of adrenaline by Intramuscular route on medical prescription or by AAI (adrenaline auto-injector) associated with the exclusion of the allergen. Adrenaline treatment should be administered as soon as possible, a failure or delay in the use of adrenaline is a risk factor for death. Anaphylaxis is a chronic disease and the patient must be informed from the first episode about the risk of recurrence and the risk of death he is exposed to. Patient education is essential for the complete removal of the triggering factor, recognition of anaphylaxis symptoms and use of AAI. The risk of recurrence is high given the difficulty to completely eliminate the favourable factor (mainly food causes and hymenopteran bites): 1/3 of deaths from food anaphylaxis occur at home, and the peak mortality rate is between 10 and 30 years old. The diagnosis of anaphylaxis can be difficult because the symptomatology can be so varied. It is under-diagnosed, which leads to a lack of medical care and therefore an under-prescription of AAI. Some American studies identifying emergency room visits for anaphylaxis find that in less than 30% of cases there is a prescription for AAI, in less than 40% of advices about triggering factor's eviction and in less than 20% a guidance to an allergology consultation. In France, the HAS published in 2013 a procedure to be followed after the treatment of a suspected anaphylaxis: the patient's management must be diagnostic, therapeutic and educational. It must be systematically based on three axes: the prescription of AAI with an explanation of its use, the provision of written information on the mechanism and symptoms of anaphylaxis, attitude to be followed in event of an anaphylactic reaction, and need for eviction if the allergen has been identified, guidance to an allergology consultation. Therapeutic education for anaphylactic patients is essential given the risk involved. In an American study, it was shown that only 60% of teens and young adults suffering from food allergies report having AAI systematically with them. Information and education is therefore essential for these patients.