Active clinical trials for "Colitis"

The exact underlying mechanisms of ulcerative colitis (UC), an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disease marked by diffused inflammation of the colon and rectum mucosa, are still unknown. Due to genetic, immune, and environmental factors, UC is highly dependent on cellular immune reactions and exaggerated inflammatory responses. The release of several cytokines, kinins, leukotrienes, platelet-activating factor (PAF), and reactive oxygen species is connected to immunological activity (ROS). Additionally, many of the cytokines will start an acute phase response, making the inflammation worse.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of JNJ-77242113 compared with placebo in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most frequent cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients and is responsible for 20-30 % of antibiotic-associated diarrhea cases. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are associated with an higher prevalence, recurrence and severity of CDI. The prevalence of recurrent CDI in patients with IBD is 2.5 to 8 times higher than in the general population, with a cumulative lifetime risk of 10 %. The higher risk to the development of CDI in patient with IBD is directly related to the microbiome alterations that are associated with this chronic disoder. Moreover, the use of antibiotics to cure CDI further worsens the gut microbiota, triggering potentially a self-maintaining cycle and predisposes such patients to a higher risk of recurrence. In these patients, CD superinfection is associated, with an increased rate of hospitalization, length of stay, the need to modify the treatment to the underlying disease, the increase rate of colectomy, there higher mortality rate, with a net increase of health costs. Nowadays, as emerged by several studies FMT has been established as a valid treatment option against recurrent CDI (rCDI), and it is recommended by international guidelines. Unfortunately, most FMT studies for rCDI have excluded patients with IBD. Recent evidence suggests that FMT is effective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and concomitant rCDI, both in the treatment of the infection and in the improve of disease activity. To date, most studies evaluated the efficacy of single infusion of FMT in these patients. Preliminary data from our group suggest that a sequential approach (i.e., repeated fecal infusions) may increase the efficacy of FMT in this population. Indeed, in 18 patients with IBD, single infusion fecal resulted in eradication of rCDI in 60% of cases, whereas this outcome was achieved in 89% of cases using a sequential approach. Similar data have been demonstrated in a retrospective study by Fischer and colleagues. However, more studies are advocated to confirm these results. Therefore, our study aim to compare the efficacy of single FMT vs. sequential in the eradication of rCDI in patients with UC.

This study included two topics: one was to test the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplants plus partial enteral nutrition (PEN) in refractory pediatric UC where conventional therapy has failed, and the other was to explore the efficacy and safety of FMT plus PEN as first-line therapy for pediatric active UC

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ozanimod compared with placebo in participants with ulcerative colitis (UC) in mainland China and Taiwan. The main study is composed of an induction period, maintenance period, safety follow-up, and participants meeting certain criteria will be given the opportunity to participate in an optional open label extension.

In the last decades fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been established as a highly effective option in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), with a success rate of nearly 90%. For this reason, it is recommended by international guidelines as a treatment option for this indication in clinical practice. Recently, a considerable body of evidences, suggest FMT as an effective and safe treatment in patients affected by Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In a recent meta-analysis of 324 subjects with UC, 30.4% of patients achieved both clinical and endoscopic remission after FMT compared to placebo (9.8%, P<0.00001). However, among the various published trials there is a fair variability in terms of methods and results, which are not comparable to those obtained in the rCDI. Nowadays, one of the most critical factors involved in the effectiveness of FMT in UC patients, is the choice of the donor. In addition, several studies have shown that some donors are associated with a higher clinical response rate than others. This hypothesis has been demonstrated in patients affected by irritable bowel syndrome, in which the use of a super-donor (a healthy person who has the predictive clinical and lifestyle characteristics of a healthy microbiota, and with a microbial profile associated with favorable clinical conditions) resulted in significantly higher clinical efficacy rates than placebo, similar to those obtained in rCDI (89%). Currently, studies that explored the efficacy of the super-donor FMT in UC patients are not yet available. Aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of super - donor FMT, compared with placebo FMT, in the treatment of UC. The investigators will randomize adult patients with a recent diagnosis of UC to FMT from super - donors or placebo, by colonoscopy (first infusion) and capsules administration. Then, patients will be followed up 2 months after FMT.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ozanimod (RPC1063) in achieving and maintaining clinical remission. Ozanimod will be administered orally to pediatric participants with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) who have had an inadequate response to conventional therapy.

The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and effectiveness of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for weight loss in a population of obese ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing colectomy with eventual Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) compared to counseling on diet and lifestyle interventions alone.

This is a multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ABX464 50mg and 25mg administered once daily (QD) as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who have inadequate response, no response, a loss of response, or an intolerance to either conventional therapies [corticosteroids, immunosuppressant (i.e. azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate)] and/or advanced therapies [biologics (TNF inhibitors, anti-integrins, anti-IL-23), and/or S1P receptor modulators, and/or JAK inhibitors]. This study is the maintenance phase of both previous induction studies ABX464-105 and ABX464-106. All eligible subjects who have completed either one of the induction studies above mentioned, will be given the opportunity to take part in the present ABX464-107 maintenance study and will be randomized to either a double blind, placebo-controlled part (Part #1) or allocated to ABX464 50mg or 25mg open label treatment arms (Part #2) depending on their clinical response at the end of induction. This study consists of a 44-week treatment phase and a 28-days follow-up period consisting in the End of Study (EOS) visit.

The primary objective is to characterize the efficacy TEV-48574 in adult participants with IBD (moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD)) as assessed by induction of clinical remission (UC) and endoscopic response (CD) at week 14. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and dose response of the 2 different dose regimens as assessed by multiple standard measures To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the 2 different dose regimens To evaluate the immunogenicity of the 2 different dose regimens The study will consist of a screening period of up to 6 weeks (42 days), a 14-week treatment period, and a 4-week follow-up period.