Active clinical trials for "Colonic Neoplasms"

Vecchione et al showed that suppression of RANBP2 results in mitotic defects only in BRAF-like colon cancer (CC) cells, which leads to cell death. Mechanistically, RANBP2 silencing reduces microtubule outgrowth from the kinetochores, thereby inducing spindle perturbations, providing an explanation for the observed mitotic defects. Vinorelbine mimics RANPB2 silencing in BRAF-like and BRAFV600E CC cell lines. These preclinical data represent a strong rationale to also explore the anti-tumor activity of vinorelbine in patients with advanced BRAF-like (both BRAFm and BRAF wild type) CC. Tumors having this gene signature are referred to as "BRAF-like" and have a similar poor prognosis irrespective of the presence of BRAF(V600E) mutation. Since vinorelbine is standard of care in advanced breast and NSCLC, there is ample experience with the dose and schedule as well as with the safety profile and supportive measures required to prevent side-effects.

This study will answer the question what the practice variation is (in terms of efficiency) in primary colon surgery on patients of 75 years and above related to the application of different modalities of prehabilitation across the Netherlands.

According to the 2019NCCN guidelines, immunocheckpoint inhibitors are recommended for first-line treatment of metastatic colon cancer patients with high microsatellite instability (msi-h) or mismatched gene deletion (dMMR) who are not suitable for intensive treatment, and for all patients with second-line or above msi-h /dMMR treatment.This study is a single-center, single-arm phase II study of the use of triplezumab (JS001) combined with CAPEOX regimen in the neoadjuvant therapy of msi-h /dMMR for locally advanced colon cancer. The subjects received neoadjuvant therapy with triplezumab (JS001) combined with CAPEOX regimen, with one treatment cycle every 3 weeks and two cycles of surgery followed by pathological evaluation.

The Transversus Abdominis Block (TAP) block is known to be an effective means of reducing patient pain after abdominal surgery. In the meantime, the general TAP block has been studied in patients who were in the recovery room and the ward after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pain reduction and opioid saving effects in patients with TAP block in ICU settings.

The present study is a multicentric randomized phase III trial designed to assess whether overall survival and quality of life are improved in patients with asymptomatic colon cancer and unresectable SLM treated with resection of the PT followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.

Our team has created an automated, real-time software based image analysis tool called Colometer to improve screening colonoscopy providing real time visual feedback on image quality. There are three components to this study. The first is to validate the bowel assessment preparation using the recorded colonoscopy videos from 50 consented normal risk patients. In the second phase, technological and machine user interface refinements will be identified and completed. Finally, the third phase will be a sham controlled prospective study of Colometer versus standard care in 100 consented average risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy as performed by 10 consented endoscopists.

The long-term results of several large-scale prospective randomized trials that compared laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer were published in the past decade. The oncologic outcomes were nearly similar in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery. In Japan, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducted a randomized trial to compare oncological outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for advanced colon cancer and recto-sigmoid cancer. However, the exclusion criterion were concerning tumor site in transverse and descending colon. The reason of exclusion was that laparoscopic procedure was difficult in transverse and descending colon cancers. However, laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancer was performed clinically. We conducted a randomized trial that compared laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in in transverse and descending colon cancer. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery on in transverse and descending colon cancer patients.

To investigate whether intraoperative intraportal chemotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy as treatment could improve disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with curative colorectal cancer resection compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. This is a prospective, blind (doctors who done outcome measures were masked), multi-center, 2-arm randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: There are several alternatives for one-stage emergency treatment of obstructive left-sided colonic cancer (OLCC): subtotal colectomy, intraoperative colon lavage (IOCL) with primary anastomosis, and the placement of a stent as a temporary measure prior to scheduled surgery. At present, it is not clear whether emergency perioperative lavage or the placement of a stent is the better technique. The hypothesis is that IOCL and primary anastomosis is equal safe or even safer than placement of a stent as a temporary measure prior to scheduled surgery, less length of stay and less cost. OBJECTIVE: To establish which of these two techniques is more efficient in OLCC from the point of view of morbimortality, economic cost, and long-term survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, controlled, randomized study of patients diagnosed with OLCC. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1: stent and deferred surgery; group 2: emergency IOCL. A simple randomization system was used. The estimated sample size required per group was 21 patients. Demographic variables, risk prediction models, postoperative morbimortality, staging, complications due to the placement of stent, surgical time, clinical follow-up, health costs and follow-up of survival were recorded.

This study is designed to confirm that first 3 months of oxaliplatin in 6 months of modified FOLFOX-6 or CAPOX treatment is not inferior to 6 months of oxaliplatin in modified FOLFOX-6 or CAPOX treatment in terms of disease free survival in patients with stage II/III colon cancer.