Active clinical trials for "Colonic Neoplasms"

The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for mortality, anastomotic leakage and other early and late postoperative complications, recurrence rate, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival after colorectal surgery for patients with colorectal cancer depending on the localization of the tumor.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to demonstrate that the intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in left-sided colon cancer, sigma and upper rectum, is not inferior to extracoprporeal resection and anastomosis, in terms of anastomotic leakage. BACKGROUND: Due to the recent events of a pandemic respiratory disease secondary to infection by SARS-CoV-2 virus or coronavirus 19 (COVID19), surgeons have been forced to adapt our surgical procedures in order to minimize exposure to the virus as much as possible. Based on the recommendations in case of surgery in patients with highly contagious viral diseases, the latest studies suggest minimally invasive accesses to minimize the risk of contagion. One of the proposed measures is the performance of intracorporeal anastomoses. Therefore, given the extensive experience of our center in minimally invasive surgery and studies on the validation of intracorporeal anastomosis techniques in both laparoscopic surgery of the right colon and rectum (TaTME), and the study of advantages that they can provide to the patient, our intention is to apply it to surgery on the left colon, sigma and upper rectum. Our hypothesis is that exteriorization of the colon through an accessory incision increases the risk of tension at the mesocolon level, thus increasing the risk of vascular deficit at the level of the staple area and it may increase the rate of anastomotic leakage. In this sense, studies that validate a standard technique of intracorporeal anastomosis in left colon surgery and that demonstrate its benefit with respect to extracorporeal anastomosis are lacking. We intend to describe a new intracorporeal anastomosis technique (ICA) that is feasible and safe for the patient and that can be applied universally. Once the ICA technique is established, it will allow us to determine its non-inferiority compared to the standard technique performed up to now with extracorporeal anastomosis. METHODS: All consecutive patients with left-sided, sigma and upper rectum adenocarcinoma will be included into a prospective cohort and treated by laparoscopy with totally intracorporeal resection and anastomosis. They will be compared with a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients of identical characteristics treated by laparoscopy with extracorporeal resection and anastomosis, in the immediate chronological period.

The approach of anastomosis in laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer (TCC) has rarely been discussed. This study aims to compare the resection margin of TCC with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) versus intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA). Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of TCC from August 2019 to July 2021 in 13 participating centers are included in this study. According to the approach of anastomosis, patients are divided into two groups, ECA group and ICA group respectively. The clinical characteristics, the perioperative outcomes and the pathological results (especially the length of resection margin) are compared between the two groups. The length of two-sided resection margins (long margin, short margin) are measured on formalin-fixed specimens and those with short margin less than 4.0 cm are defined as unqualified specimens.

P patients with acute obstructive colon cancer I resection or bridge to surgery with stent or stoma C emergency procedure O morbidity and mortality within 30 days, 90 day mortality and 3 & 5 years overall survival

We are the missing link in clinical trials, connecting patients and researchers seamlessly and conveniently using a mobile health platform to advance medical research. We make it easy for patients to contribute to research for medical conditions that matter most to them, regardless of their location or ability to travel.

Whether patients with stage II colon cancer should receive adjuvant chemotherapy or not is still on debate.MicroRNA(miRNA) is a promising tool. Investigators invented a tool consisting of 6 miRNA(miR-21、miR-20a-5p、miR-103a-3p、miR-106b-5p、miR-143-5p and miR-215) that was effective to identify one should accept adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Here investigators randomly assign patients to be assessed by classical pathological features or the miRNA tool of determining who should accept chemotherapy. Disease free survival and overall survival are the end points of observation.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols were developed to standardize perioperative practice in colon surgery to reduce morbidity, improve recovery, and shorten length of stay (LOS). Better protocol adherence translates into fewer readmissions and complications, and better 5-year survival. Preoperative elements, especially nutrition and immunonutrition, are topics that need further development to become the standard of care. It has been widely reported that the prevalence of malnutrition reaches 40% in cancer patients at the time of diagnosis. Impaired nutritional status at the time of surgery and cancer-induced inflammation, along with postoperative inflammatory responses to major surgery, increase the risk of postoperative complications, along with a decrease in perceived quality of life. Immunonutrition can modulate inflammation and reduce postoperative infections and shorten length of stay by counteracting the immune response induced by cancer. Adipose tissue has been shown to be a relevant source of inflammatory mediators, which may play a role in the promotion of tumor cachexia. The present study is a multicenter randomized control study (RCT) designed to evaluate the effect of preoperative immunonutrition in patients with colorectal cancer eligible for elective minimally invasive procedures, evaluating in particular surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. A biopsy of subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue will also be performed, in order to evaluate the differences between inflammatory infiltrate, degree of fibrosis and cross-sectional area of adipocytes compared to controls.

This clinical trial evaluates whether an adaptive text-message intervention is useful in helping survivors of colorectal cancers (CRC) eat more whole grain foods and less refined grain foods. Most CRC survivors don't achieve the recommended intakes of whole grains or fiber, even though there is strong evidence that a high-fiber diet rich in whole grains lowers the risk of death from CRC. Dietary interventions are a promising approach for reducing death from CRC, and text message interventions specifically are a promising tool for reaching diverse populations. This trial evaluates a text-message based dietary intervention that continuously adapts message content to be specifically tailored for the participant for increasing whole grain consumption.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a PET scan in oncological patients, with and without simultaneous treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal therapy, in improving quality of life and the need for supervision by health professionals during its performance after 6 weeks of intervention. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial, parallel groups with active control group. With randomization blinding, patient assessment and data analysis. STUDY SUBJECTS: 78 patients diagnosed with breast and colon cancer and treated up to 2 years later, both with surgery, chemotherapy and hormonal treatments (aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen). INTERVENTION: three treatment groups: supervised therapeutic exercise group without supervised therapeutic exercise group without chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal treatment, supervised therapeutic exercise group with simultaneous chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal treatment and control group. Two groups will be supervised in performing PET for a period of 6 weeks and the other group will do it autonomously and unsupervised. Patients will be followed for 1 year, with five blinded assessments: at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months after baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Main: Quality of life assessed with questionnaire measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-30). Measured pre-post intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months. Secondary: Cancer-related fatigue assessed with the Functional Assessment of scale Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F). Measured pre-post intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months. Functional capacity measured with the 6-minute walk test. Pre-post intervention measurement, 3, 6 and 12 months. Strength assessment measured with manual hydraulic dynamometer and 5 repetitions of the sit-to-stand test. Pre-post intervention measurement, 3, 6 and 12 months.

This study is a randomized, double-blind, post-chemotherapy, adjuvant phase III clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to determine the value of regorafenib in improving disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with Stage III (IIIB or IIIC) colon cancer as defined by the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual are randomized 1:1 to placebo or the experimental agent regorafenib following completion of at least four months of standard adjuvant therapy (e.g., 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) , capecitabine, oxaliplatin (CapeOx), and other).