Active clinical trials for "Diverticulitis, Colonic"

This study evaluate the prevalence of advanced colonic neoplasia (ACN) in acute diverticulitis. A sub-analysis of complicated and uncomplicated acute diverticulitis will be made in order to determinate whether there are differences of advanced colonic neoplasia (ANC) prevalence in both groups and to assess if a colonoscopy is necessary.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety of Seal-G MIST System in reinforcing colorectal anastomosis, in subjects undergoing colorectal surgery.

A multicenter prospective observational study. Aim of the study is to identify the clinical parameters correlating with favorable outcomes in patients undergoing surgery or medical treatment for diverticular disease. The primary aim is be the assessment of quality of life of theses patients according to the GIQLY score at 1 year from the enrollment in the registry. Patients will be enrolled in a prospective study and followed for 36 months after the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis. All participating centres are tertiary hospitals located in Europe .

The General Objective of this study is to investigate the cost and efficacy of treating patients undergoing colorectal surgical resections with an opioid limited pain control regimen as part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol. This group will be compared to a traditional opioid based pain control regimen.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy (by assessing the clinical success of treatment) of intravenous antibiotic therapy with ertapenem in patients with acute attacks of sigmoid diverticulitis for 4 vs. 7 days.

A leak from a colorectal anastomosis is a post-operative complication surgeons fear the most, following colonic resection. Over the years, there have been multiple suggestions for intraoperative tests for the integrity of the colorectal anastomosis. Two of the most common tests that are performed routinely are: Air tight leak test - filling the pelvis with saline and insufflating air trans anal - looking for air bubbles in the saline filled pelvis. Injecting diluted dye (methylene blue) trans anal, and looking for blue dye stains on gauze pads covering the outer side of anastomosis. The aim of the study is to compare the two methods, and to assess if there is a superior method. A secondary aim is to establish standards to perform the test, mainly to assess the appropriate pressure to apply on the anastomosis. In this prospective study patients scheduled to undergo colonic resection of their distal part of the colon/ rectum with colorectal anastomosis, will have both testing methods performed sequentially and will be followed post-operative to assess the yield and sensitivity of the testing methods.

The goal of this observational study is to study the emergency surgical treatment of diverticular disease in Sweden outside clinical trials. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which is the preferred surgical method of acute diverticular disease in Sweden? Which are the short and long-term outcomes of the different surgical methods? Researchers will compare the different methods to see if there is a surgical operation that is superior for the treatment of acute diverticulitis.

Previous multicentre study NCT 01008488 indicates that a patient with CT-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis has a very low risk (1.4%) of developing severe complications such as perforations or abscesses. The question is whether or not hospitalization is necessary, and if patients in that case could return home without antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if out-patients managements in uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis is possible without readmission or complications.

The severity of diverticulitis is usually graded with the use of modified Hinchey Criteria. However, there is a condition often seen in the CT scan that is not included in this classification itself; 1-2 pericolic bubbles but no free air or fluid into the abdomen or above the liver. Outcome in these patients remains unknown. We aim to analyse the treatment that these patients and their evolution over the first year after the diagnosis in order to predict the disease related outcome. The study is set up as a retrospective multicentre observational study. Inclusion criteria are Patients over 18 years old, Diagnosed of acute diverticulitis with a CT scan reported as 1-2 pericolic bubbles with or without free fluid. Exclusion criteria: 1) CT scan showing free distant bubbles in the abdomen. 2) CT scan showing abscess. Accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 137 subjects are necessary in the observed group to recognize a difference in morbidity greater than or equal to 10%. A proportion in the reference group has been estimated to be 20%. It has been anticipated a drop-out rate of 0%. Primary outcome is 30-day morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include malignancy and 1 year morbidity including recurrences and ongoing disease. Data will be collected in an online repository. The CT scans will be reviewed by 2 experienced independent radiologists. The management of these patients at the moment of the diagnosis will be recorded, as well as their evolution over the first year during the outpatient clinics. Figure 1 represents the study flow chart. Data will be collected in an online secure and protected repository (Castor edc). The planned study period is 2 years (01/06/2020 - 31/12/2021). CT scans will be reviewed by 2 experienced radiologists. Every other CT scan performed during the follow-up will be reviewed by the same radiologists. The management of these patients at the moment of the diagnosis will be recorded, as well as their evolution over the first year during the outpatient clinics. This study protocol is a new approach to an unknown entity in diverticulitis. We are convince that the outcomes are clinically relevant to patients and interesting for all physicians treating diverticulitis.

Acute gallbladder pathology and acute diverticulitis are common conditions met in emergency departments and comprise the bulk of admissions throughout general surgical calls. Both entities need imagistic description to tailor further management, which may be not readily available at the moment of patient's presentation. These delays may lose the window of opportunity for timed, quality decision making and may induce increased length of stay and subsequent increased costs. Ultrasound scanning has become very popular over the last half century and the equipment has become more compact, of a higher quality and less expensive, which has facilitated the growth of point-of-care ultrasonography - POCUS - that is, ultrasound performed and interpreted by the clinician at the bedside. The concept of an 'ultrasound stethoscope' is rapidly moving from theory to reality. There are a number of studies and case reports that are highlighting the advantages of POCUS, but still common grounds need to be sought after. Some countries, like USA and Germany, incorporate basic ultrasound in their resident's curriculum among different specialties. In the author's knowledge and based on the literature, there are a few-second-to-none studies regarding POCUS involving strictly the surgeons. The hypothesis of this study is that, surgeon performed ultrasound can be as accurate as the radiologists' findings for basic diagnostics in the aforementioned pathology, leading to real time decision making in the benefit of the patient. The closing remark is that by learning and doing these procedures the surgeon performing POCUS doesn't undermine his/her radiologist colleague's authority and skill. The big picture is that some basic tasks are transferrable and if used in an appropriate and methodical manner the final common goal - the benefit of the patient - is readily achieved.