Development of a Serum Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening (COLODIAG préclinique)
Colorectal CancerColorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem, with 44,872 new cases per year in France (3rd most common cancer), and 17,684 deaths (2nd cause of death from cancer). Colorectal cancer screening is used to detect early-stage cancers and precancerous lesions (adenomas). Detecting the disease at an early stage enables curative treatment, which is less aggressive and less costly than treatment at an advanced stage. Fecal occult blood screening has proven its effectiveness in the general population, with a 14% to 16% reduction in colorectal cancer mortality, and even a drop in incidence with 2nd generation immunological tests (FIT). In France, organised colorectal cancer screening in the general population has been in place since 2009 and since 2015 has been based on the use of a quantitative immunological test (OC-Sensor®). This test is offered every 2 years to men and women aged between 50 and 74 with an average risk of developing CRC, i.e. nearly 19.7 million people. The disadvantages of the current screening test are: Insufficient sensitivity, although the FIT is more sensitive than the old guaiac test, its sensitivity is not perfect. Insufficient specificity: many colonoscopies are performed for nothing. This unjustifiably exposes many patients to endoscopic complications and incurs an unnecessary cost to society. The participation rate in screening is too low. Colorectal cancer screening participation was 32.1% in 2017/2018, below the European minimum efficiency target of 45% and far below the 71% observed in our Dutch neighbours. Several non-invasive alternatives for colorectal cancer screening are being explored and proposed. Among these techniques, serum protein assay has shown its interest in terms of screening for adenomas and colorectal cancers. The assay of 7 serum proteins (which will be the subject of a patent application in 2020), by ELISA test, is the subject of this study. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective study, with comparison to the gold standard: total colonoscopy. If these results are confirmed, this would make it possible to develop a new non-invasive method of colorectal cancer screening, which would have several advantages over the current test: better sensitivity than the FIT (estimated at about 38% for the detection of advanced adenomas and 88% for colorectal cancers) which would limit the number of false negatives and decrease the number of colorectal cancers discovered at a late stage, a better specificity which would limit the number of false positives and decrease the number of unnecessary colonoscopies, a better participation in the screening test, and a reasonable cost with a technique that can be routinely performed in many centres. Prior to this prospective clinical study, a pre-clinical calibration phase of the test (combined dosage of the 7 candidate proteins) is necessary, which is the subject of the present project.
Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal CancerSuppression2 moreThe aim of the study is to evaluate whether the preoperative level of myeloid-derived suppressor cells is associated with postoperative complications classified by Clavien-Dindo categories. Levels of all MDSC, polymorphonuclear MDSC (PMNMDSC), monocytic MDSC (MMDSC), early-stage MDSC (EMDSC) and monocytic to polymorphonuclear MDSC ratio (M/PMN MDCS) were established and compared in patients with postoperative complications, severe postoperative complications (>= IIIA according to Clavien-Dindo) and severe septic complications.
Effect of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on 3-year Survival After Colorectal...
Colorectal CancerSeveral recent studies have shown that the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces morbidity and mortality and shortens the length of stay compared to conventional recovery strategy (pre-ERAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of this protocol on 3-year overall survival and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.
ENDO-AID Assisted Tandem Colonoscopy RCT
Colorectal NeoplasmsThis study hypothesizes that more adenomas will be detected using the ENDO-AID assisted Colonoscopy compared to conventional colonoscopy. A single-centre, randomized, same-day, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy trial comparing Adenoma Missed Rate and Adenoma Detection Rate in ENDO-AID assisted colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy.
A Clinical Research of CAR T Cells Targeting CEA Positive Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Stage III Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancer Liver MetastasisThe main purpose of this research is to verify the safety of CEA targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells and to determine the proper dosage of CAR T cells infused.
Predictive Factors of Conversion in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection
SurgeryColorectal Neoplasm1 moreBackground Laparoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer. Rates of conversion to open surgery range between 7% and 30% and controversy exists as to the effect of this on oncologic outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze what factors are predictive of conversion and what effect they have on oncologic outcomes. Material & Methods From a prospective database of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between 2000 and 2018 a uni- and multivariate analyses were made of demographic, pathological and surgical variables together with complementary treatments comparing purely laparoscopic resection with conversions to open surgery. Overall and disease-free survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Novel Stent Placement Technique for Intestinal Stenosis Assisted by an Ultrafine Endoscope
Colorectal CarcinomaColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and results in 8-25% acute malignant bowel obstruction. Since Dohmoto et al. first applied and reported the self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of colorectal stenosis, they have been widely used not only as an alternative treatment as a bridge to surgery (BTS), but also as a mean of palliative option for stenosing lumen in clinical practice. Numerous publications have reported that the stent placement technique showed 75% to 100% technical success rates and 84% to 100% clinical success rates. However, it is sometimes difficult to place due to the distorted anatomy or acute angulations in patients and other conditions with poor endoscopic visualization with the normal colonoscope. The aims of this study were to present our results with two novel SEMS implantation techniques.
The mCRC Patients With pMMR/MSS or dMMR/MSI-H Status Received Palliative Chemotherapy Efficacy and...
Colorectal Cancer MetastaticMismatch Repair Deficiency1 moreDeficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) accounts for 4-5% in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The efficacy and survival of patients with dMMR/MSI-H status received palliative chemotherapy have not clear yet. In this study, the investigators observed the efficacy and survival of dMMR/MSI-H status mCRC patients received palliative first-line chemotherapy.
Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Uninsured
Colorectal CancerThrough this program, the investigators will test a systematic colon cancer screening outreach strategy for increasing screening completion among uninsured patients, not up-to-date with screening. The intervention will consist of mailed screening invitations, with processes such as phone reminders to promote screening and evidence based follow up. All patients will be randomly assigned to receive mailed invitations to complete a home fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Some patients will be randomly assigned to receive a small financial incentive on completion of FIT testing.
Promoting Veteran-Centered Colorectal Cancer Screening
Colorectal CancerSystematic efforts to improve colorectal cancer screening use in the VA Healthcare System have resulted in an increase in not only appropriate, but also inappropriate use of screening. The purpose of this study is to test a new, more patient-centered approach to colon cancer screening. In older individuals (ages 70 to 75) who are "due" for screening, the investigators will provide education on the benefits and harms of colon cancer screening. But instead of simply providing these patients with "average" information about these benefits, the investigators will give them information that takes into account their personal characteristics (e.g., age, gender), overall health, and screening history and therefore applies to them more personally. The investigators will also work with the health system to create time and space for patient and doctor to discuss whether screening is the right choice for each individual. This way, patients can make an informed choice about what is right for them, with the help of their doctor. In the future, the results of this study will help patients make more informed screening decisions, especially when the benefits of screening may be uncertain for them personally.