Epidemiological Study of Colorectal Cancer in WuHan
DiarrheaConstipation4 moreThe incidence risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing at 4.2% year by year in China. Most effective way to reduce the death rate of CRC patients is to diagnose in quite an early stage. QiaoKou District is a chemical industry Zone of Wuhan with a long history, which has few data of CRC epidemiology. The investigators design the primary CRC screening for this district by healthy questionnaire, Fecal Occult Blood Test(FOBT) and colonoscopy. HanYang Areo has been chosen as Control for its non-industry environment.The crowd would be screen biennially. The high risk group would be intervened, such as resection of polyps or other specific treatment. A follow-up registration database has been built for analysis the relationship between incidence or death rate to high risk factors, such as age, life environment, lifestyles, base diseases and family history of cancer. This study will provide some epidemiology dates of CRC to the local Government, and assist the governor to built a more effective screening system of CRC.
Safety Study of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy To Treat Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal CancerTo assess the safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer
Iscador Qu as Supportive Treatment in Colorectal Cancer (Union International Cancer Control, UICC...
Colorectal CancerEfficacy and safety of a supportive treatment with European mistletoe extract Iscador® Qu ("quercus", i.e. from oak tree) in patients with colorectal cancer (Union for International Cancer Control, UICC stages II-IV), in addition to post-operative conventional oncological therapy (radio-, chemo-, targeted therapy) as compared to a parallel group with conventional therapy only. Primary Endpoints: Reduction of adverse effects of conventional therapy; reduction of therapy or disease induced symptoms (both are quality of life parameters and evaluated after 1 year); prolongation of disease free and/or overall survival (DFS, OS) after 5 years. Prospective observational confirmation study of previous retrospective cohort study. As this is a non-interventional cohort study, all therapies and measurements are performed on directive by the treating physician and/or request by the patient only.
Study of Genes and the Environment in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in the East Anglia Region...
Colorectal CancerRATIONALE: Studying samples of blood from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer. PURPOSE: This study is looking at genetic susceptibility for cancer and interactions between genes and the environment in patients with colorectal cancer.
Optimum Timing for Surgery After Pre-operative Radiotherapy 6 vs 12 Weeks
Adenocarcinoma of the RectumAdenocarcinoma20 moreThe aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 6 weeks. Hypothesis: Greater downstaging and tumour regression is observed when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of CRT compared to 6 weeks.
Follow-Up Study of Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Colorectal...
Colorectal CancerRATIONALE: Following patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer may help doctors learn more about the disease and plan better follow-up care. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is following patients who have undergone surgery for stage I, stage II, or stage III colorectal cancer.
Association of MSI, TS, DPD, MVD and EGFR With Chemosensitivity in Stage IV in Colorectal Cancer...
Colorectal CancerThe present project will follow our previous phaseⅡ study of FOLFOX regimens for the treatment of stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer. We will recruit at least 200 patients for this study. The selection of patients will be based on rigorous eligibility criteria. The patients will be allocated based on the expression of each molecular marker (MSI, TS, DPD, MVD and EGFR) and the implementation of chemotherapy. For example, in the examination for the clinical implications of EGFR, the patients will be classified into four groups: EGFR(+) chemotherapy(+); EGFR(+) chemotherapy(-); EGFR(-) chemotherapy(+); EGFR(-) chemotherapy(-). Base on the analysis of this 2×2 table, we will clarify the prognostic significance of a specific molecular marker is due to whether the specific molecular marker predicts biological invasiveness and/or chemosensitivity. We believe the present study will have the following significance: (1)To further clarify the mechanisms for the carcinogenesis and progression of CRC; (2)To facilitate the development of novel chemotherapeutic agents; and (3) To gain the experience for the practice of evidence-based medicine.
Patient Satisfaction With Colonoscopy in a Danish Setting - What Are the Most Important Factors?...
Colorectal CancerThe study aim is to investigate factors associated with patient satisfaction during a colonoscopy.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Using Liverspecific Oral Contrast Agent in Metastatic Colorectal...
Neoplasm MetastasisLiver3 moreThe purpose of this study is to determine whether MRI with manganese containing contrast agent detects more livermetastasis compared to CT scan
Assessment of Current Biomarker Testing Practices for Common Solid Cancers in Precision Oncology...
Breast CarcinomaColorectal Carcinoma4 moreThis trial assesses current biomarker testing practices for common solid cancers in precision oncology in the community setting. Cancer biomarkers are used for diagnosing the disease, determining prognosis, predicting response to a targeted therapy, or monitoring response to therapy. Testing quality, including accuracy and timeliness, is imperative for correct disease prognosis and identification of patients who may or may not benefit from a targeted therapy. Assessing current biomarker testing practices may help doctors identify gaps and variations in testing as well as on potential ?best practices? that may be informative and generalizable to community oncology programs.