Irinotecan Drug-eluting Bead Liver Embolisation Registry
Colorectal Cancer MetastaticLiver MetastasesPurpose: The purpose of this study is: to assess and define the current practice of the delivery of irinotecan loaded drug eluting beads in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer; to correlate how the delivery of this drug compares to worldwide/European guidelines, and to determine which individual variations in delivery may be associated with an increased complication profile or better outcome. The aim of the study is to: Prospectively evaluate the number of centres providing DEBIRI To determine the number of patients being treated nationally per year To evaluate individual variations in practice with respect to number of treatments, method of pain control, side effect profile, and complication profile. To collect patient specific data subsets to allow correlation and causal associations between these individual variations, and relate these to efficacy and survival during the study period.
Geriatric Assessment and Intervention in Older Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer...
Colon CancerColon Neoplasm2 moreThe GEPOC study investigates the effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment and intervention for frail older patients (65 years or older) undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer. the geriatric intervention will be pre- and postoperative. included in the intervention is an exercise intervention. The main aim of the study us to see if the functional decline in this group can be reduced.
FT500 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Subjects With Advanced...
Advanced Solid TumorsLymphoma16 moreFT500 is an off-the-shelf, iPSC-derived NK cell product that can bridge innate and adaptive immunity, and has the potential to overcome multiple mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance. The preclinical data provide compelling evidence supporting the clinical investigation of FT500 as monotherapy and in combination with ICI in participants with advanced solid tumors.
Efficacy of Preoperative Intravenous Iron in Anaemic Colorectal Cancer Surgical Patients
AnemiaIron-Deficiency1 moreIron deficiency anaemia is a common condition among colorectal surgical patient. Untreated anaemia would lead to increase in blood transfusion, surgical complications and mortality. Treatment with oral iron sulphate is poorly tolerated due to side effects. Intravenous iron supplement provides an alternative way to rapidly replace iron deficit during the preoperative period among surgical patients. Evidence is growing for its effect in rising hemoglobin level and reducing blood transfusion, at the same time supporting its safety profile. The investigators plan for a single-centered, randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of intravenous iron compared to standard care in terms of hemoglobin level/serum ferritin increment, need for blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, quality of recovery and surgical complication rate, as well as safety profile among colorectal cancer surgical patients in Hong Kong. The investigator propose the following pilot RCT for exploring the effect size and study process in conducting the above-mentioned large-scale RCT.
Safety and Efficacy of Vicriviroc (MK-7690) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants...
Colorectal NeoplasmsThis trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of vicriviroc (MK-7690) at 2 dose levels in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants with advanced/metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC).
First-line Irinotecan, Lederfolin and 5FU (FOLFIRI) and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Colorectal...
Colorectal Cancer Stage IIBevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy represents a standard of care for first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Molecular predictive factors for bevacizumab efficacy have not yet been identified therefore selection of patients more likely to benefit from such a treatment approach is not possible. Retrospective analyses suggested that LDH serum levels may influence the clinical activity of anti-angiogenetic drugs. Primary aim of our clinical trial will be to prospectively ascertain whether bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy has an improved clinical activity in patients with high LDH serum levels compared to patients with normal LDH serum levels
Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Who Have Progressed After Standard...
Colorectal NeoplasmsThis is an open-label phase III study of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after all approved standard therapy. The purpose of this study is to provide additional information about the safety profile of Regorafenib.
Safety Study of Regorafenib and SIR-Spheres® Microspheres Radioembolization in Patients With Refractory...
Colorectal NeoplasmsThe purpose of this study is to determine the safety of regorafenib, an antiangiogenic drug, when combined with radioembolization using SIR-Spheres® microspheres in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) that has spread to the liver.
Study Comparing Pathological Responses Observed on Colorectal Cancer Metastases Resected After Preoperative...
Metastatic Colorectal CancerThe study is designed to analyze the pathological tumor response on resected colorectal cancer metastases after preoperative treatment with bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI regimen in a prospective cohort and to correlate this response with patient's outcome.
Gemcitabine in Combination With Pemetrexed Long Term Infusion in the Treatment of Pretreated Metastatic...
Colorectal Cancer MetastaticStudy Design: Multicenter, non randomized, open label phase II study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gemcitabine/Pemetrexed combination. Enrollment period: 18 months. Treatment period: maximum for 24 weeks for each patient (12 cycles lasting 2 weeks). Total duration of the study: 24 months. Number of Subjects: Approximately 38 subjects will be enrolled on study: - First stage:12 patients enrolled If 1 or 0 responses were observed, the trial had to be terminated: - Second stage: an additional of 23 patients were to be enrolled. If 5 or less responses were observed in 35 patients, the combination would not be considered worthy of further study, while if 6 or more responses were observed, the combination would be considered sufficiently active to warrant further testing. Taking into account an invalidity rate of 5%, 38 patients will be needed for this step.