Active clinical trials for "Gallstones"

To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive approach to cholecystectomy and to establish a description of this novel translumenal technique in humans at this institution.

Uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy will in most patients result in moderate to severe pain until the first postoperative day. This will subside during the second and third postoperative day [1]. A feeling of low general well-being will also be present until the first postoperative day and subside during the next couple of days [2]. To achieve faster recovery after laparoscopic interventions it has been shown that a reduction in the size of laparoscopic ports and thereby incisions can reduce postoperative pain [3,4]. A new minimal invasive surgical technique is based on the principle of completely eliminating the use of ports through the abdominal wall. This new technique is called Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and is defined by acquiring minimal invasive access to the abdominal cavity through the body's natural openings like the mouth and stomach, anus, urethra and vagina. With the NOTES technique one can completely avoid incisions in the abdominal wall and thereby reduce the surgical trauma. The benefits of this technique is a reduction of postoperative pain, elimination of incisional hernias, prevention of wound infections, reduction of peritoneal adherence formation, achieving a faster recovery and a better cosmetic result [7,8]. The most documented and well-described way for gaining NOTES access to the abdominal cavity is through the vagina, transvaginal (TV). TV NOTES has mainly been used for cholecystectomy because of the direct line of vision to the upper abdomen and gallbladder that is achieved through this opening. Compilation of results show that TV NOTES cholecystectomy can be implemented with low complication rates [20-22]. One retrospective case-control and one prospective observational study report less postoperative pain, reduced consumption of analgesics and faster recovery for TV NOTES compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy [23,24]. To date there are no systematic prospective randomized data on whether or not TV NOTES cholecystectomy leads to a better surgical outcome. In the present study the postoperative course after TV NOTES cholecystectomy will be compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a prospective randomized and blinded trial. The outcome of the randomization between the two surgical techniques will be blinded to patient and the nurse staff for the first 72 hours after the operation. The primary outcome parameter will be postoperative pain score during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcome parameters are postoperative pain score for the first 72 hours, fatigue, well-being, nausea, consumption of analgesics, complications, cosmetic result and sexual function. The hypothesis being that TV NOTES cholecystectomy gives less postoperative pain, fatigue and nausea, a reduction in analgesics and a better cosmetic result and general well-being than conventional 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This study proposes to evaluate the ability to reduce the size and number of laparoscopic incisions required to perform gall bladder removal by using flexible endoscopic instruments introduced through the mouth, into the stomach and through the stomach wall.

To study the incidence and predictors of developing symptomatic gallstone disease following bariatric surgery.

This study will compare Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), focusing on patient-reported outcomes and cost.

Retained CBD stone after ERCP is a common problem in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of saline irrigation of common bile duct after complete stone removal considered by ERCP in the reduction of residual CBD stone and the effect on clinical outcome.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects (good and bad) of giving a drug called pentoxifylline to patients with acute pancreatitis.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard therapy for acute cholecystitis, but temporary decompression of the gallbladder (GB) through percutaneous or endoscopic route can be required to alleviate inflammatory process and reach an appropriate time for elective surgery in patients with high operative risk or marked local inflammation or organ dysfunction. Also preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often needed because common bile duct (CBD) stone is accompanied in patients with acute cholecystitis at reported rate from 7-20%. Two-steps approach of percutaneous transhepatic GB drainage (PTGBD) followed by ERCP or vice versa has been performed for the treatment of acute cholecystitis with concomitant CBD stone who are not suitable for urgent cholecystectomy. However single-step drainage of CBD and GB through ERCP and endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage (ETGD) using nasocystic tube or plastic stent has alternatively been attempted in patients who have contraindications for PTGBD. In clinical practice, many endoscopists have hesitated to perform ETGD because of its relatively low technical success rate and specific concern about post-ERCP adverse event but it minimizes catheter keeping duration, and provides effective clinical improvement via physiologic route. Currently there are scarce data on if ETGD using nasocystic tube or plastic stent are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy and safety.

Providing safe and efficient anesthesia and in a field hospital is a challenging situation. This study investigated the feasibility and safety of thoracic spinal anesthesia for small-incision open cholecystectomy in a deployed field hospital.

Prospective randomized pilot clinical trial, with 3 arms and one year follow up. The study will include 60 patients, with a 1:1:1 ratio, 20 patients per group. In 40 patients a transumbilical single site incision will be performed with two different manners: single-port device SILS TM (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery), and flexible endoscope and accessory trocars in a single incision (FSIS-Flexible Single Incision Surgery). The third group is the control one, a conventional laparoscopic approach. The trial is designed as a pilot study to assess, as main objective, if these two endoscopic approaches have the same security and effectiveness in cholecystectomy. Hypothesis: Transumbilical approaches with single port and single incision with the flexible endoscope have the same efficacy and safety performing the endoscopic cholecystectomy. Objectives: Main objective: Assess whether both approaches are equally safe in its application to endoscopic cholecystectomy. Secondary objectives: Investigate the differences in the rate of conversion to open surgery between different surgical approaches. Investigate the differences in the rate of wound infection between the different surgical approaches. Investigate the differences in the rate of postoperative incisional hernias between different surgical approaches. Investigate whether there are differences in the rate of overall complications, all-cause mortality and the cost between different surgical approaches.