Active clinical trials for "Postoperative Complications"

The aim of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided ESBP and Rhomboid block in terms of postoperative pain management, postoperative opioid consumption and complications in patients undergoing lobectomy with VATS.Patients aged 18-75 years, ASA 1-2-3, who gave informed consent to lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) method will be included in this study. Patients with contraindications for the application of either method, known chronic pain, local anesthetic allergy, spinal deformity or mental or psychiatric problems that prevent cooperation, taking anticoagulants, and infection at the injection site will not be included in the study. Patients who agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to one of the anesthesia groups of the study, which include ESPB (elector spina plane block) (Group 1) or Rhomboid block (Group 2). Randomization will be at a ratio of 1:1 and will be done by the closed-envelope method. Beforehand, a piece of paper with the name of one of the two groups will be placed inside the envelopes and the envelopes will be closed and mixed. A closed envelope will be drawn randomly for each patient before the procedure, and procedures will be carried out according to the group specified on the paper.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether application of an incisional wound Prevena trademark (TM) dressing (applies negative pressure to wounds) in the obese (BMI ≥30) surgical patient will reduce surgical site infections (SSI) when compared to the standard of care dressing.

There are 2 types of surgical procedures to remove the appendix : open appendectomy or laparoscopic appendectomy. About 60000 appendectomies are performed every year in France. Early diagnosis of acute appendicitis is essential to prevent the risk of disease progression, leading to complicated appendicitis and an increased risk for mortality. Data regarding appendicitis management in the literature are numerous. However, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of those patients has led to a decrease in the number of visits for acute appendicitis (ER), but a higher proportion of complicated appendicitis, probably due to the patient's delayed decision to go to emergency department at the onset of clinical symptoms. Complicated appendicitis may also lead to an overuse of antibiotics, a longer hospital stay, and a higher global cost for the health system. This aim of this study was to evaluate whether this hypothesis was valid for the regional NANCY-METZ area (CHR Metz and CHRU Nancy). The main research hypothesis was that the pandemic caused by SARS-COVID 19 was significantly linked to an increased incidence of perioperative complications in patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis in this region (North-east part of France).

An observational, analytical, multicentre prospective cohort study will be conducted throughout Colombia. A sample size of 1353 patients is needed to achieve significance in our primary objective; however, convenience sampling is considered, as we aim to include all the institutions and patients possible. The data collection will be carried out prospectively for one week, and all patients will have a follow-up of a maximum of 30 days in-hospital. The primary outcome will be to determine the in-hospital mortality. We aim to contribute with accurate information on in-hospital postoperative mortality in Colombia. Thus, by following precisely the instructions created by The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. The data obtained will help formulate public policies in the surgical field adjusted to the Colombian population, improving the quality of the surgical divisions in the different Colombian institutions, positively affecting the attention and development of the Colombian healthcare system.

Elective colectomy procedures typically require bowel preparation starting 2 days prior to the surgery. Osmotic laxatives such as Colyte® are administered 2 days prior, and Nothing by mouth (NPO) is required 1 day prior to ensure no fecal residue is left in the bowel. Though it may ensure a cleaner and safer surgery, this longer period of starvation increases insulin resistance and may increase post-op complications. However, there is evidence that administration of oral rehydration solution(ORS) prior to surgery reduces insulin resistance. Our purpose is to evaluate the difference of insulin resistance in those who received ORS 1 day prior to surgery and those who did not.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a single preoperative high-dose steroid injection on complications in the immediate postoperative phase after open kidney surgery (kidney resection, heminephrectomy, nephrectomy). Primary outcome is complications in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes are organospecific complications in the post anaesthesia phase, pain and nausea the first 5 days, seroma and wound infection the first 14 days and readmissions the first 30 days after surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the frequency of transfer to the PACU and organospecific complications will be lower among patients receiving high dose dexamethasone. The investigators hypothesize, that there will be no difference in wound infections, seroma or readmissions.

The investigators designed a protocol for a Bayesian unplanned posthoc analysis using the pooled dataset from three large randomized clinical trials. The primary endpoint will be a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) within the first seven postoperative days, which reflects the primary endpoint of the original studies. The investigators will carry out a reanalysis of the harmonised database using Bayesian statistics.

Lengthy hospitalization and immobility can lead to muscle loss resulting in reduced recovery rates and prolonged hospital stay or readmission. Older adults discharged from hospitals are at an increased risk for functional decline, falls and disability. Daily exercise and physical activities have proven to enhance the recovery and discharge process for older patients from the hospital and ultimately save vast amounts of dollars each year. The aim of this study is to initiate early mobilization and decrease the rate of functional decline in post-surgical older adults' patients in the acute care hospital setting in Alberta, Canada. The investigators are implementing a BE-FIT (BEdside reconditioning for Functional ImprovemenTs) a quality improvement, evidence-based exercise program that focuses on early mobilization and recovery by minimizing bed rest, promoting functional tasks, and encouraging self-management. Patients enrolled in the program will receive a bedside exercise plan to be completed independently throughout their stay in the hospital. Control patients will receive usual care without the added exercise plan. Patient mobility during their hospital stay will be assessed pre and post BE-FIT initiation according to a predetermined mobility scoring system. Secondary outcomes will include: time-to-mobility, length of stay, complication incidence and hospitalization costs.

The incidence of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is approximately 12-15% and is associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and 2-year major vascular events. Using both traditional longitudinal analysis techniques and novel methods in machine learning, investigators will explore whether intraoperative and postoperative vital signs can enhance MINS surveillance by providing temporal prediction of MINS events.

Moderate-risk surgical patients have a very high incidence of early serious postoperative complications (approximately 50% at Royal Adelaide Hospital, RAH). This affects patients' wellbeing and produces a high rate of unplanned postoperative hospital re-admissions. This is also costly, and patients unnecessarily fill approximately 4000 RAH bed days annually. A trial of a new model of enhanced care after surgery (Advanced Recovery Room Care, 'ARRC') demonstrated that complications were quickly identified and expertly addressed. Re-admission days appeared to decrease by 80%. Business and economic analysis showed (i) patients can expect 3 extra days at home, (ii) 4000 bed days can be freed annually, and (iii) better care at lesser cost (technically, ICER = -$600/day at home). Freeing hospital beds, and rapid cost savings, are critical in this Covid era. This trial re-introduces ARRC for Orthopaedic, Colorectal, Gynae-Oncology and Neurosurgery, and other specialties, and formally examines patient outcomes and costs compared to eligible patient who do not receive ARRC. Data from patient progress and vital signs are to be used to improve patient risk stratification and triage at defined timepoints before, during, and after surgery. This may allow better and earlier identification of patients (not) needing ongoing ARRC, potentially reducing costs of care further without affecting safety. A Markov cost-effectiveness model provides the platform for cost effectiveness outcomes (Days at Home V Cost).