Active clinical trials for "Constriction, Pathologic"

RECAS is a prospective cohort of 1,000 patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and undergoing revascularization therapy or standard medication treatment alone. The goal of this study is to validate whether CAS revascularization when compared to standard medication treatment alone, can effectively reduce the progression of Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) burden, as well as improve the severity of retinal pathologies and cognitive impairment. Therefore, Patients aged ≥ 40 years have more than 50% stenosis in unilateral carotid artery and sign informed consent will be recruited. In this study, patients will be asked to undergo Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)/ Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP),multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) and neuropsychological testing. Estimated follow-up can be up to 10 years.

The goal of this observational study is to understand the processes of what causes and accelerates the disease progress in aortic stenosis and following aortic valve replacement. Participants will undergo transthoracic echocardiography every 6 months, with annual visits for state-of-the-art scanning techniques including positron-emission tomography combined with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with radiotracers designed to look at disease processes including fibrosis, calcification, inflammation and thrombosis activity.

Rheumatic mitral stenosis remains a health problem in developing countries. Progressive fibrosis of the valves and myocardium is the main pathophysiology that plays an important role. Dapagliflozin has various beneficial effects on the heart by reducing fibrosis, reducing inflammation, and improving patient quality of life. However, the role of this therapy is unknown in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pelacarsen (TQJ230) administered subcutaneously once monthly compared to placebo in slowing the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis.

The purpose of this registry is verifying the continued safety and effectiveness of the Optilume DCB clinical use in patients undergoing dilation of the urethral stricture.

To determine the safety and efficacy of GIE Medical's ProTractX3™ TTS DCB for the treatment of recurrent benign bowel strictures.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a serious and common condition that affects 2-3% of the population >65 years of age in Western countries. It is also responsible for extraordinarily high healthcare expenditures, estimated to be over $6 billion annually,2 in part because the primary treatment for severe AS is aortic valve replacement (AVR) which is resource-intensive. Valve abnormalities are frequently recognized before AS becomes severe, or before there is need for guideline-directed procedural intervention, thereby providing an opportunity for pharmacologic intervention to slow disease progression. Yet, all attempts to prevent AS progression in those with degenerative non-congenital forms of disease have failed. The only non-procedural intervention that benefits patients with moderate or greater AS is the aggressive treatment of hypertension, which reduces net left ventricular (LV) afterload (valvulo-arterial impedance [Zva]) and can slow secondary LV remodeling. The overall goal of this proposal is to integrate advanced imaging and vascular biology to study how von Willebrand factor (VWF) and platelet adhesion promote AS progression through many parallel pathways, thereby representing a potential therapeutic target. We are hypothesizing that blood markers of abnormal VWF proteolysis and platelet-derived factors, and abnormal valve shear patterns which can be detected by advanced analysis of spectral Doppler on echocardiography are predictors for progressive AS.

BSUS patients were prospectively enrolled in this study, and non-randomly treated with "balloon dilation +CMUS" and "balloon dilation + tandem DJ stent". Perioperative data of the patients were recorded to compare their efficacy and complications, and the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire was used to compare their impact on patients' quality of life. CMUS and tandem DJ stents were removed after ≥3 months of indwelling. After the removal of stents, the patients' serum creatinine and renal pelvis width were followed up to compare their curative effect on BSUS.

Over the last years, several randomized studies comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have established TAVI as a treatment option in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) (1,2,3). Most transcatheter heart valves (THV) available are designed on either a balloon-expandable (BE) or a self-expanding (SE) concept. Despite major differences, both designs are recommended to be used indifferently in most of the clinical situations and a significant number of centers only implant one of this two THV design. It remains unclear however, whether these 2 very different THV concepts are achieving similar or different clinical outcomes and could be considered a single "Class" of device. While there is an urgent clinical need to clarify this issue in an exponentially growing therapeutic field, to date no large randomized study powered to compare the 2 THV designs on individual endpoints has been conducted or initiated. Recently, two large-scale French registry-based propensity matched analyses, including more than 30,000 patients, have reported a higher 90 days and 1-year mortality with the use of SE as compared to BE-valve (4,5). However, as the propensity-score matching-approach cannot rule out residual confounders, and as some of the most recent THV iterations were not part of the investigation, there is an urgent need to conduct a randomized trial sufficiently powered to compare head-to-head the latest generation of SE and BE-valve on all-cause mortality. In addition, two small randomized studies have recently showed the inferiority of a new SE-valve compared to BE-valve and SE-THV (SCOPE1 trial, J Lanz. Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1619-1628. and SCOPE 2 trial, Circulation in press), thus further questioning wether THV should be considered as a single "Class" regardless the THV design. The objective of the present randomized clinical investigation will be to evaluate the impact of THV design (SE vs BE) on the risk of all-cause mortality at 90 days and 1 year. The present clinical investigation will the first randomized clinical investigation to compare head to head the benefit of BE-valve over SE-valve on total mortality at 90 days and 1-year using a superiority design. Previous head-to-head studies included only a small number of patients, non-inferiority designs and combined endpoints. This clinical investigation will be the first to generate sufficient evidences to change clinical practice and international guidelines to clarify whether one THV design is superior (or not) to the other one (BE vs SE-valve). The result of the clinical investigation is key for clinicians indicating the treatment and for the patients receiving the treatment

SURF is a randomised controlled, parallel group, single blind phase II study designed to assess the safety and potential efficacy of an innovative therapeutic strategy for urethral stenosis based on adjuvant injection of autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction of Adipose Tissue (ADSVF) during endoscopic urethrotomy (standard care).