Active clinical trials for "Coronary Artery Disease"

Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) diagnosed without significant lesions in invasive coronary angiography (ischemia non-obstructive coronary artery disease - INOCA) represent approximately 50% of all patients with CCS. Results of FAME study clearly showed that evaluation of coronary circulation should not be accomplished only with visual assessment in resting conditions. Current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines of diagnosis and treatment of CCS published in 2019 emphasize the necessity of performing complex coronary physiology assessment. Invasive physiological measurements and vasoreactivity provocative tests emerged as key tools to differentiate between vasospastic angina, microcirculatory angina, overlap of both conditions or non-cardiac disease. According to contemporary literature, identification of heterogeneity of patients with INOCA is crucial for determination of adequate treatment. An appropriate pharmacotherapy has a potential to improve outcomes including grade of angina, quality of life, exertional tolerance and most important - MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events) free survival. However, there is a lack of evidence on each of the subtypes of INOCA especially in those with signs and symptoms of vasospasm in provocative test but without visual spasm in epicardial vessels.

With the emergence of advanced technology to date in the artificial intelligence (AI), computer aided diagnosis has gradually gained its popularity in the field of healthcare. Particularly, in the clinical practice of coronary artery disease diagnosis, the application of AI could be of great implication in alleviating the shortage of medical sources. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the AI-based coronary CT angiographic analysis software (RuiXin-CoronaryAI) for diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis, a retrospective, multi-center, cross-over designed, blinded, sensitivity superiority and specificity non-inferiority clinical trial will be conducted.

Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of NC Xperience to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with NC Xperience .

The study is to compare the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

The CAREPATH will conduct Technical Validation and Usability (TVU) study by involving ≥ 45 target end users (16 patients with MCI or mild dementia with their informal caregivers and 16 healthcare professionals from various disciplines) and Clinical Investigation (CI) study involving ≥ 200 patients (≥ 100 users to pilot the CAREPATH platform and ≥ 100 patients as reference cases). Both of these pilot studies will be coordinated in four European countries (Spain, Romania, Germany and UK) with diverse health and social care systems, ICT landscape/digital maturity of healthcare provision and dementia national programs, which will allow for strengthening the evidence base on health outcomes and efficiency gains. The CAREPATH outcomes can be summarized as: An Integrated Care Platform that jointly addresses multimorbidity, dementia and diminished intrinsic capacity and optimally manages healthcare interventions for its users (patients, informal caregiver, healthcare providers, etc). Technical Validation and Usability (TVU) study involving over 45 users and Clinical Investigation (CI) involving over 200 patients that will be conducted in four European countries (Spain, Romania, Germany and UK) during two years and mobilizing the other necessary actors, such as caregivers and healthcare professionals, for the validation of healthcare interventions. Dementia / Multimorbidity Guidelines that will be conceived for best healthcare delivery. Health Economics Impact Assessment for healthcare cost effectiveness and care provision equalities. The incremental cost-effectiveness and the incremental cost-utility ratio would allow revealing the incremental cost (or the potential savings) per unit of benefit of switching from usual care to CAREPATH-an integrated patient-centred approach- in multimorbid elderly patients with dementia, and therefore, to determinate whether the CAREPATH approach would be considered as a cost-effective alternative.

Adults with coronary artery disease (250 patients) undergoing cardiac surgery participated in the study. The aim is to investigate short-term and long-term cognitive outcomes and the patterns of organization of functional brain systems in ischemic brain damage using high-resolution electroencephalography, domain-specific assessment of cognitive status and analysis of markers of a neurovascular unit (neuron-specific enolase, brain neurotrophic factor).

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of a 2-year follow-up to determine whether RFR-guided coronary intervention is non-inferior to FFR-guided coronary intervention in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

In this prospective, multicenter observational study, The investigators evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DAPT over 1 year in all patients with coronary artery disease, including patients with complex high-risk coronary artery disease (CHIP), who underwent PCI using the Genoss DES stent, and performed subgroup analysis. Through this, the investigators aim to determine whether there are differences in safety and effectiveness depending on whether or not the patient is a subject with complex high-risk coronary artery disease.

This is a hospital-based registry study that will be to describe clinical and paraclinical features, procedural-related characteristics, short and long-term outcomes, hospital costs of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at University Medical Center of Ho Chi Minh City (UMC), together with investigating predictors for patients' adverse clinical outcomes. The specific objectives of this study are: To validate a framework/model of PCI registry in UMC To investigate the demographic, clinical of cardiovascular diseases and procedural characteristics of patient undergoing PCI in UMC To investigate the procedural success, in-hospital adverse events and patient outcomes at one-month, three-month, twelve-month, three-year and five-year follow-up after PCI in UMC To estimate in-hospital and procedural costs associated with PCI in UMC To develop a prognostic prediction model for patients after PCI in UMC

The Short-Cut trial is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that is designed to compare the efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty vs. intravascular lithotripsy prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with moderate to severely calcified coronary arteries.