Active clinical trials for "Coronary Stenosis"

This is an on-label clinical study design intended for the collection of three different types of interventional procedural data using FDA-cleared cardiac catheterization technologies and drugs, each used according to its product labeling and standard practice of medicine.

Coronary CT angiography is challenging in patients with more than mildly calcified coronary vessels, because of calcium artefacts that prevents evaluation of the lumen. The purpose of the CCT-PCD-1-study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and image quality in coronary CT angiography using a commercially available CT system equipped with a photon counting detector technology. Patients referred for cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography as part of routine preoperative evaluation before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) will be asked for inclusion in the study. This group of patients has generally a coronary artery calcium burden and perform cardiac CT and coronary angiography as part of routine care. The diagnostic accuracy concerning significant coronary artery stenosis on the preoperative CT will be evaluated with the conventional coronary angiography as reference. Also, CT examination image quality will be evaluated.

A randomised open-label pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with a drug eluting balloon alone in coronary de novo lesions). Elective patients requiring PCI to coronary de novo lesions in vessels 2.5 mm - 4.0 mm.

This study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, open label trial to compare the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guided Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intermediate coronary artery lesion.

The primary objective of this study is to study the safety and efficacy of the BiOSS LIM C with respect to Patient oriented Composite Endpoint (PoCE) at 12 months in a "real world" left-main bifurcation population and as compared with a prespecified performance goal.

Drug eluting stents (DES) are widely used for treatment of coronary artery lesions. The Xience Sierra stent has a refined design of the metal stent backbone and is used in patients with various clinical syndromes and in different lesions. Clinical outcome of patients with previously unknown (silent) diabetes and prediabetes is of increasing interest since the latter group has recently shown to be associated with a significant risk of adverse cardiovascular events after treatment with contemporary DES. Outcome data in a population of high-risk all-comer patients, including many patients with diabetes mellitus and prediabetes, would be of great interest, but such data are not available yet. In addition, there is a lack of data in a general all-comer population. Therefore, the COASTLINE study will primarily assess the safety and efficacy of the Xience Sierra stent in a general all-comer population as well as a high-risk all-comer population.

Patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe coronary artery stenosis who were treated at Zhejiang Second Hospital and cooperative hospitals were randomly divided into a patient management group based on continuous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or a patient management group based on HbA1c. Both groups controlled cardiovascular risk factors according to the Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (2020) and the ADA Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes (2023), and conducted HbA1c testing every 3 months. In the CGM-based glucose management group, CGM measurements will be performed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. In the CGM-guided treatment group, the target TIR>70%, TBR<4%, TAR<25%, and HbA1c<7.0%; in the HbA1c-guided treatment group, the target HbA1c<7.0%. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke).

The optimal screening methods for coronary insufficiency, a frequent and pejorative complication in diabetics, are subject to debate, particularly in situations of silent myocardial ischemia. The contemporary strategy consists of pre-selecting asymptomatic patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk by performing a coronary calcium score. If this is found to be high >300 AU (Agatston units), the patient is suspected of being at high risk of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI), and the assessment is completed to exclude the presence of coronary artery disease likely to benefit from revascularization. The complementary evaluation consists in evaluating the myocardial perfusion to judge the perfusion repercussions. The most common examination to date is myocardial scintigraphy, because stress tests are too frequently submaximal in diabetics. However, the reproducibility of scintigraphy is controversial and their sensitivity and specificity are debated in this indication. This problem is similar in stable symptomatic coronary diabetic patients for whom an indication for functional examinations is justified. The double-energy double-layer spectral scanner (SDEDC) could now become a relevant tool in this field, since it can combine not only anatomical data (identification of coronary stenosis) but also functional data (myocardial perfusion) during a stress protocol. thanks to the spectral images which make it possible to measure the tissue concentration of intramyocardial iodine downstream of the considered stenosis.

This study compares angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with long coronary lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (Ultimaster stent) or everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Alpine stent). The study uses a randomized, multicenter, controlled design approach.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of a novel CT gantry supporting a .23 second rotation time and systematically compare it with 0.23 second rotation time, in patients with clinically indicated aortic CTA in the workup of aortic stenosis. Patients will be randomly assigned .23 or .28 sec rotation time CTA. Coronary artery interpretability rates will be determined in both groups.