Active clinical trials for "COVID-19"

This is a randomized, open label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcitriol supplementation in COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency.

Vaccination coverage against COVID-19 differs widely between countries: in order to address this public health issue, this observational study seeks to understand whether there are any determinants/predictors. In order to highlight the presence of determinants and their strength in influencing vaccination coverage, all possible socio-demographic, economic, cultural, infrastructural and political variables considered capable of modifying such coverage were selected and analysed.

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is still raging across the world and vaccination is expected to lead us out of this pandemic. Although the efficacy of these vaccines is beyond doubt, safety still remains a concern. Liver injury, such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), has been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. The aim of this prospective study is to investigate the spectrum and profile of liver injury after COVID-19 vaccination in Asia-Pacific region and to explore the potential risk factors for the development of liver injury.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused high hospitalization and mortality rates especially in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, there is no present study with a large number of patients that would offer us clear answers on the treatment of ICU COVID-19 patients with adsorption filters, extracorporeal methods and the hemoperfusion method. The purpose of this registry study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the extracorporeal blood purification and hemoperfusion/hemadsorption filters in treating of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Patients with cancer are considered vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and have been prioritized in the vaccination process in several countries, including Taiwan. In addition, international oncological societies favored COVID-19 vaccination for cancer patients on the basis of risk and benefits evaluation of all available data. However, patients with cancer were excluded from SARS- CoV-2 vaccines registrational trials and the investigators lack data regarding the safety and efficacy of vaccination in this population. Under this perspective, the investigators undertook a large prospective study enrolling patients with solid cancers, hematologic malignancies as well as healthy volunteers for the kinetics of anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination on different anticancer therapy. Major inclusion criteria for this cohort of the study included: (1) age above 20 years; (2) presence of solid organ malignancies treated with immunotherapy, chemotherapy, Targeted therapy irrespective of the treatment phase; and (3) eligibility for vaccination.

This study will compare two approaches to cognitive rehabilitation in adults with long COVID with persistent, mild to moderate, cognitive impairment. Both approaches will feature a web-based computer "game" that trains cognitive processing speed, i.e., how quickly individuals process information that they receive through their senses. This training is termed Speed of Processing Training (SOPT). One approach will add (A) in-lab training on everyday activities with important cognitive components and (B) procedures designed to transfer improvements in cognition from the treatment setting to everyday life. Component A will include work-related tasks. This approach is termed Constraint-Induced Cognitive Therapy (CICT). The other approach will add (A) in-lab training on relaxation, healthy nutrition, and healthy sleep and (B) procedures designed to promote integration of these lifestyle changes into everyday life. This approach is termed Brain Fitness Training (BFT). A subset of participants, who qualify for and and desire vocational rehabilitation (VR), will receive VR from the Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services (ADRS) in addition to CICT or BFT. ADRS VR will include career counseling, prescription of on-the-job accommodations, and guidance on return-to-work. Those in the CICT + VR group will also receive on-the-job coaching from a peer mentor for a month after completing training. CICT, with or without VR, will involve 30 hours of training. Ten 3-hour in-lab, face-to-face, therapist-directed sessions will be scheduled. These sessions will feature one hour of SOPT; the remainder will be committed to in-lab training on the target behaviors and the procedures designed to promote transfer of therapeutic gains to daily life and improving skills essential to work; the set of the latter procedures is termed the Transfer Package. To accommodate the demands of participants' other activities, training sessions will be permitted to be scheduled as tightly as every weekday over 2 weeks or as loosely as every other weekday or so over 4 weeks. If a family caregiver is available, they will receive training on how to best support participants in their therapeutic program. After training ends, four follow-up phone calls will be scheduled approximately one-week apart with participants to promote integration of the skills gained during training into everyday life. BFT, with or without VR, will involve 30 hours of training following the same schedule as for CICT. Ten 3-hour in-lab, face-to-face, therapist-directed sessions will be scheduled. These sessions will feature one hour of SOPT; the remainder will be committed to in-lab training on the target behaviors (healthy sleep, nutrition and relaxation habits) and the procedures designed to promote transfer of behavior change to daily life. If a family caregiver is available, they will receive training on how to best support participants in their therapeutic program. After training ends, four follow-up phone calls will be scheduled approximately one-week apart with participants to promote integration of the skills gained during training into everyday life. Participants will be randomly assigned to the interventions. Randomization will be stratified by whether participants qualify for and desire VR from ADRS or not. If yes, participants will be randomized in equal numbers to CICT + VR or BFT + VR. If no, participants will be randomized in equal numbers to CICT or BFT. Testing will happen one month before treatment, one day before treatment, one day afterwards, and 6- and 12-months afterwards. Outcomes measured will include cognitive processing speed, cognitive function on laboratory tests, and spontaneous performance of everyday activities with important cognitive components in daily life. Another important outcome measure will be whether or not participants were able to return back to work or had significant improvements in their work activities.

The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the Severe-Acute-Respiratory-Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which rapidly spread globally in late 2019, reaching pandemic proportions. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness and mild extrapulmonary symptoms, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death. For COVID-19, most primary care physicians have initially treated their patients at home according to their judgment, with various treatment regimens they believe are most appropriate based on their experience/expertise. We recently published a note on how we were treating patients at home based on the pathophysiology underlining the mild/moderate symptoms at the onset of the illness and the proposal of simple drugs that theoretically better fit these mechanisms. Because the common early mild symptoms of COVID-19 highlight a systemic inflammatory process, there is the recommendation of using anti-inflammatory agents to limit excessive host inflammatory responses to the viral infection, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. Moreover, COVID-19 patients are exposed to the risk of thromboembolic events and anticoagulant prophylaxis is recommended even at home, in particular settings, unless contraindicated. In an academic matched-cohort study, we found that early treatment of COVID-19 patients at home by their family doctors according to the proposed recommendation regimen almost completely prevented the need for hospital admission (the most clinically relevant outcome of the study along with death) due to progression toward more severe illness (2 out of 90 patients), compared to patients in the 'control' cohort who were treated at home according to their family physician's assessments (13 out of 90 patients). However, the rate of hospitalization was a secondary outcome of the study and the possibility of a casual finding cannot be definitely excluded. Moreover, these findings were achieved in a retrospective observational study with two matched cohorts of COVID-19 patients, a possible additional limitation of the robustness of the conclusions that would deserve further validation. Thus, we have considered the observed reduction in patient hospitalization a hypothesis generating finding to be confirmed. In this pragmatic, prospective, three-months, cluster randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) clinical trial, we will compare two groups of family doctors according to a randomized approach, who will treat their COVID19-patients with the proposed recommendation algorithm or other treatment regimens they normally feel appropriate according to their usual clinical practice, and monitor them longitudinally up to 3 months. Our working hypothesis is that following the proposed recommendation algorithm the early COVID-19-related inflammatory process is limited, preventing the need of hospital admission at larger extent than with other therapeutic approaches also targeting early symptoms of the illness at home. Should the findings be confirmed, the tested standardized treatment protocol would achieve major benefits for patients with early COVID-19 in particular in relation to a remarkably reduced risk of hospitalization that is expected to translate into reduced morbility and, possibly, mortality. Notably, these expected clinical benefits would be associated with remarkably reduced treatment costs related to reduced hospitalization.

This is a PET/CT study using the 18F-αvβ6-binding-peptide.The goal of this study is to evaluate this peptide in patients after infection with SARS CoV2.

This study adopts a randomized, double-blind, placebo parallel control design, and is expected to include 168 eligible patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia.

One way to empower a community, in epidemic control issues, is to know the first-hand screening tools. There are no evaluations of these home-use tools from the perspective of patient and citizen empowerment and participation. The main objective of this study is to analyze whether a self-tracking and self-tracing tool, developed in a participatory way, increases the risk identification of the disease and the empowerment in terms of risk management of transmission by the participants.