Active clinical trials for "Craniocerebral Trauma"

The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of the helmet-less tackling training (the HuTT Technique) intervention to reduce head impacts in high school football players and to gain an understanding of the neurocognitive effects of repetitive head impacts in football. The investigators hypothesis is that the HuTT Technique will result in a reduced frequency and magnitude of helmet impacts than the control group measured by a head impact measurement system. Also, the investigators hypothesize the HuTT Technique group will demonstrate less changes in neurocognitive scores in the mid and post season evaluations compared to the control group. Head impacts will be measured using the SIM-G impact monitor made by Triax Technology. The SIM-G impact monitor measures the location, magnitude, and direction of every head impact in real time and is stored on a protected cloud-based system. The sensor is worn by each athlete in a headband or skullcap. Neurocognitive function will be measured using the Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test. The test is used as a tool to determine baseline neurocognitive function and is used in comparison if an athlete was to be injured to ensure he/she returns to baseline. ImPACT measures memory (verbal, visual, working), processing speed and reaction time using a variety of tests. Subjects will be recruited from local high school football teams and will include freshman, sophomores and juniors. Since the study is expected to run for 2 years, seniors will not be eligible for participation. The target is to recruit at least 150 total subjects. All subjects will be equipped with a new helmet that is fitted to their head and a headband that will be used to hold the head impact telemetry sensor. In addition, all subjects will take an ImPACT test preseason, midseason and postseason. At the conclusion of each season, all of the impacts from the SIM-G impact monitor system and ImPACT test scores will be analyzed. The relevant outcome measures to be analyzed include head impact frequency, location, magnitude, symptom scores, memory, visual motor speed and reaction time composite scores. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if the HuTT intervention minimized head impacts and neurocognitive decline compared to the control group.

The aim of our study is to highlight biomarker-s of Abusive Head Trauma by proteomics analyses on the serum of child victims of abuse.

For patients with mild head trauma, a large number of CT scans are performed. The S100B protein allows, when the dosage is below the threshold, to rule out the diagnosis of brain damage with a negative predictive value of 98%. In patients over 65 years old it was found that the dosage of S100B came back positive more often compared to a younger population. This study proposes to determine the positivity threshold value for S100B dosage in patients over 65 years old. In patients over 65 years suffering from mild head trauma, a head CT will systematically be performed (in accordance with the recommendations) and the S100B will be measured (taken from an additional tube on the blood test carried out in these patients). The results of the TDM will then be compared with the results of the S100B to determine the values of sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of different thresholds.

The present study aims to describe the structural tissue and cell characteristics of the olfactory mucosa in patients with persistent anosmia (≥2 years) due to COVID-19 or head-trauma, in comparison to healthy individuals with intact olfactory function. In order to avoid possible age-related degenerative changes in the neuro-epithelium, both patients and controls are between 25 and 35 years of age.

The goals of this study are to identify outcome indicators of optimal care for brain injury patients, including pre-hospital care, prompt delivery to neurosurgical care and access to early rehabilitation services. Nova Scotia's centralized Neurosurgical services and integrated provincial Emergency Health Services provide a rich opportunity to construct a cohesive, integrated data management system. This system will allow us to answer important research questions related to the outcomes, care and prevention of brain trauma. Retrospective data collection The retrospective arm of the BTO study has created full data sets and care pathways from multiple sources covering the continuum of brain trauma care. Investigators continue to analyze this large amount of data and prepare it for publication. Prospective data Collection Patients with a major head injury (initial GCS 3-12), have been considered for enrollment in the BTO study.The prospective arm of the BTO study has 52 patients enrolled. Screening and Enrollment was complete on June 30, 2007. These patients are participating in long term follow up at 6, 12 and 24 months post injury for assessment of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. Completion of patient follow up will be in June 2009.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new rubber material used to make prosthetic replacements of the face lost to cancer, trauma, or birth defects.

Music intervention is a non-pharmacological and effective intervention that can alleviate anxiety and agitation in patients undergoing weaning. The effectiveness of music intervention in reducing anxiety of patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of music intervention on anxiety, agitation, sleep quality and physiological parameters on patients in ICU. This study was conducted from January to June 2019. A total of 196 hospitalized ICU patients were divided into two groups. Subjects in experimental group received 30 minutes music intervention for 3 days on bedside whereas subjects in control group received routine care only. The primary outcome was anxiety. Agitation Sedation Scale, sleep quality and physical parameters were selected to collect as secondary outcomes.There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline. The results of this study support that music can reduce anxiety and agitation levels in ICU's patient. Nurses can incorporate this intervention into the daily care in order to reduce the discomfort of patients.

Cerebral scans are a key examination in the management of serious brain-injured patients in intensive care, and are often repeated in the initial phase. This is a critical clinical period for these fragile patients, who are likely to develop episodes of intracranial hypertension (ICHT), the duration of which is correlated with a poor prognosis. These patients are therefore exposed to the complications of intra-hospital transport (IHT) (HTIC, hypoxaemia, arterial hypotension, disconnection of the respirator, respiratory asynchronies), which can worsen their vital and neurological prognosis. The incidence of adverse events linked to HIT has been estimated at up to 79.8%, including episodes of HTIC, worsening the prognosis and increasing the length of hospitalisation. In addition, patient safety during HIT requires the mobilisation of a doctor, a nurse and a care assistant, an organisation that implies a reduction in the care team's time with the other intensive care patients in their care. In this context, the portable cranial scanner, with imaging quality similar to that of conventional scanners, is already in routine use in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany. This tool could reduce examination times, thereby reducing the risk of adverse events for the patient, in particular episodes of HTIC, and optimising the mobilisation of intensive care professionals. Studies suggest that the use of portable cranial scanners significantly reduces the duration of the examination (total duration including transport time) (50 minutes for conventional scanners versus 20 minutes for portable scanners), without altering the cerebral perfusion pressure or intracranial pressure of intensive care patients. In addition, the use of portable scanners could generate savings for hospitals. In fact, in American and British teams where the use of portable scanners is widespread, several studies have shown that the time spent by radiology staff is reduced and the number of intensive care professionals mobilised is reduced compared with the use of conventional scanners. In addition, freeing up conventional scanner slots could lead to an increase in conventional scanner activity. For example, in a neurovascular emergency department environment at Massachusetts General Hospital, USA, the introduction of a mobile scanner reduced access time to the examination by 58% (39 minutes ±5.1 vs. 17 ±2.7 for conventional scanning), which also suggests faster implementation of emergency treatments such as the intravenous thrombolysis evaluated in this study. Finally, an American study carried out in 2008 estimated the financial gain generated by the use of a portable scanner versus a conventional scanner at more than 2 million dollars over 5 years and a complete return on investment of 7 months, from a hospital point of view. To date, no French intensive care unit is using such a tool, even though the benefits appear to be real in terms of reducing the number of episodes of hypertensive haemorrhage and the prognostic impact this may have. The main aim of our pilot study is to assess the feasibility of using a portable brain scanner in cerebro-injured patients in intensive care by comparing the time taken to perform the portable examination with that of a conventional scanner. The investigators will also evaluate the existence and duration of HTIC episodes and the occurrence of any adverse events compared with a strategy based on a conventional fixed scanner.

The investigators will test the impact of a decision aid, Head CT Choice, to determine if its use improves parents' knowledge and engagement in decision making and safely decreases healthcare utilization in children presenting to the emergency department with blunt head trauma.

Family dynamics and caregiver responses to a child with traumatic brain injury are implicated both as precipitating events as well as factors influencing outcomes of abusive head trauma (AHT). However, no family behavioral health intervention exists to meet the unique needs of families with infants and very young children with AHT. The study was initially designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of an evidence-based behavioral intervention to improve outcomes for families and children with AHT. However, rates of recruitment were so low that the investigators and funder amended the study to be intervention only (with IRB approval). At that time, there were five participants and only one had been assigned to the intervention arm. Only one additional family was recruited, and that family did not complete study measures prior to the time at which the intervention would start and did not receive the intervention. The investigators did examine outcomes in multiple dimensions, including clinical, cognitive, family, caregiver, child behavior, and service usage over time but connot compare to patients not receiving the intervention. The investigators were not able to examine characteristics of patients and families best suited for this behavioral health intervention.