search

Active clinical trials for "Malocclusion"

Results 131-140 of 316

Efficacy of Piezosurgey Corticotomy (a Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique) in Accelerating Orthodontic...

Surgical IncisionMalocclusion

Applying flapless piezocision corticotomies on the alveolar bone and separating anterior mandibular teeth using a piezosurgery device (i.e. ultrasonic waves that perform very accurate incisions without any sutures following this procedure) may improve the speed of tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups. The efficacy of this procedure on 18 patients (experimental group) will be evaluated,whereas the second group (control group) will receive a traditional orthodontic therapy. The time required to achieve complete alignment of crowded mandibular anterior teeth (from canine to canine) will be compared between the two groups.

Completed19 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction Rate Assisted by Two Corticotomy Techniques

Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

This study aims to assess the dental changes, periodontal health and the pulp vitality in mini-screw supported en-masse retraction associated with traditional or flapless corticotomy techniques. 40 adult patients exhibiting class II division 1 malocclusion requiring upper first premolar extractions followed by en-masse retraction will participate in the study. They will be randomly and equally distributed into two groups: traditional corticotomy (20 patients) versus flapless corticotomy (20 patients). The corticotomy procedure will be performed pre-retraction. The dental changes will be assessed using dental casts. The impressions will be taken after finishing the leveling and alignment phase and before starting the en-masse retraction (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), and 5 months (T5) following the onset of en-masse retraction. The final impression will be considered at the end of the en-masse retraction (when the canines reach Class Ι relationship).

Completed17 enrollment criteria

Treatment Adherence With Twin-Blocks for Correction of Class II Malocclusion

CompliancePatient1 more

To compare the effect of two control intervals (once every 4th week or once every 6th week) on the wear time of a Twin Block removable appliance.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Effects of Orthopedic Mandibular Advancement in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion on Pharyngeal Airway...

ClassII Division 1 MalocclusionMandibular Retrognathism

This study aims at evaluating the effects of mandibular advancement on pharyngeal airway space and nocturnal breathing in children with skeletal class II division1 malocclusion. Fifty patients will be enrolled in the study divided into control and experimental groups.

Completed8 enrollment criteria

Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents...

Palatal Expansion TechniqueMalocclusion2 more

Miniscrew-supported maxillary expanders provide advantages over conventional tooth-supported expanders. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding their activation protocol. The purpose of the clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the effects of slow and rapid activation rates of miniscrew-supported expanders on the skeletal changes, dento-alveolar changes and the pain experience.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy

Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

This study aims to estimate the levels of pain and discomfort associated with the en-masse retraction of the six upper anterior teeth and assisted by either conventional or flapless corticotomy. Thirty-four adult patients exhibiting class П division 1 malocclusion will be randomly allocated to either the conventional corticotomy group or the flapless corticotomy group, and they will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). The levels of pain and discomfort will be rated after 24 hours of corticotomy (T1), four days (T2), seven days (T3), 14 days (T4) and after 28 days of corticotomy, by asking the patients to fill in a questionnaire for assessing levels of pain and discomfort.

Completed17 enrollment criteria

Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction

Malocclusion

the study aimed to clinically evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement, as evaluated by its effect on the rate of canine retraction.

Completed8 enrollment criteria

Tooth-Borne Versus Tooth-Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders: A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation...

Posterior Crossbite

The force exerted by the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances provides expansion of the transverse dimension by splitting of the midpalatal suture. This expansion results in three-dimensional (3D) changes in maxillary position which also effects circummaxillary surrounding structures. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effects of tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on soft tissue with stereophotogrammetry.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices

Class II MalocclusionClass III Malocclusion3 more

Various malocclusions require the extraction of the first premolars and retraction of the canines with the need for maximum anchorage. If the canines are pulled into the extraction space using the molar teeth for support, unwanted tooth movement occurs. This study aims to evaluate the effect of temporary anchorage devices and power arms, which are auxiliary orthodontic appliances in reducing undesirable tooth movements.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction

Dental MalocclusionsAngle Class II2 more

The aim of the present clinical study was directed to evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction; in addition, the potential risk for root resorption during maxillary canine retraction.

Completed11 enrollment criteria
1...131415...32

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs