Active clinical trials for "Malocclusion"

to evaluate the outcome of LLLT regarding leveling and alignment of the mandibular anterior segment.

The aim of this prospective study was to compare between two different treatment modalities of class II division 2; to start treatment in upper arch first until adequate overjet is obtained or to start in the lower arch first with removable anterior bite plane in upper arch.

Comparison of orthodontic patients treated with aligners and traditional (clear braces)

The purpose of this research is to test which of four clear aligner attachment types is more efficient in extruding (erupting) maxillary lateral incisors vertically into correct position during orthodontic treatment.

This study protocol is for a randomised clinical trial which aims to test two materials used as orthodontic archwire to compare FireWire archwires to Copper Nickel Titanium (CNiTi) archwires. Both professional and patient related outcome measures are to be used to fully evaluate performance.

To demonstrate that growing teenagers which present up to full cusp Class II malocclusions can be treated using the Invisalign System.

To gather data indicating whether or not the OrthoAccel device speeds tooth movement in people who use orthodontics (braces).

The aim of this study is to comparatively investigate the performances of two different and widely used transfer trays during indirect bonding of the orthodontic braces.

The study aimed to clinically estimate an influence of a 635nm diode laser on the primary and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants placed in a maxilla, to assess mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment. The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 15 subjects, 30 implants (Dual Top Anchor System, Seoul, Korea) with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm. Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla in 20 patients (13 women and 7 men; age: 32.5 ± 6.1 years).

This investigational testing aims to target multiple investigations sites to examine treatment efficiency metrics using a completely digital and patient-specific bracket treatment system for the correction of malocclusions.