Active clinical trials for "Complex Regional Pain Syndromes"

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting 1 of 5 Canadians and costs over 40 billion in healthcare and loss of productivity each year. Since its prevalence is increasing, especially as the population ages, effective low-cost treatment is key to reduce impact of chronic pain on patients' quality of life and on healthcare cost. Due to the complexity of chronic pain and differences between the multitudes of pain conditions, developing effective treatments is challenging. This is especially true for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). CRPS is characterized by severe pain out of proportion to tissue trauma, with local autonomic and inflammatory changes resulting in inability to work, depression, sleep disorders, and suicidal ideation. Although its prevalence is low in Canada, CRPS is considered one the most debilitating and least understood pain conditions. As most current treatment options have low evidence of effectiveness, there is no definitive treatment available and most often, patients are struggling to maintain an acceptable quality of life. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify new and improved treatments for adults with CRPS. An early hypothesis of CRPS pathophysiology posited that sympathetic nervous system over-activity led to many of the signs and symptoms of CRPS. As such, sympathetic nerve blocks, including stellate ganglion and lumbar sympathetic blocks, have been repeatedly investigated as a potential treatment of CRPS, but a recent meta-analysis suggests that these blocks provided no benefits for those suffering with CRPS. Newer evidence suggests that a peripheral microvascular dysfunction may underlie CRPS pathophysiology. However, no clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of a treatment targeting this peripheral pathway. The goal of this project is to assess the efficacy of a single-shot axillary brachial plexus block plus physiotherapy as a novel treatment protocol for CRPS. Our primary hypothesis is that providing a brachial plexus block in conjunction with a physiotherapy program would be superior to physiotherapy alone in treating pain and function in CRPS. Since this is a novel treatment protocol for CRPS, the purpose of our proposed study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered clinical trial.

The objective of this prospective, observational study is to determine the association between the composition of the gut microbiota and the severity and persistence of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome symptoms (Study A). The objective of Study B, a longitudinal study of microbiota biomarkers of patients with newly diagnosed CRPS is to determine if the researchers can predict which patients are more likely to recover compared to those who do not. A secondary objective of both studies is to examine cognitive flexibility in relation to outcomes (study A and B).

This observational study aims to understand phenotype-specific molecular signatures in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

This study will examine whether a form of non-invasive brain stimulation can help reduce pain in people with persistent neuropathic pain.

To demonstrate that spinal cord stimulator has an effect on sympathetic function (the one that give us the fight and flight response). Therefore, if the spinal cord stimulator has an effect on sympathetic function, the responses from CRPS patients to different stimuli will differ significantly pre and post SCS implant. If CRPS patients exhibit autonomic, CRPS patients could be stratified according to their sympathetic function pre-implant. It is expected that patients with a moderate/mild form of autonomic dysfunction will have better outcomes with the SCS.

The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous neridronic acid in subjects with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). The trial consisted of an Enrollment Period lasting up to 60 days, Treatment Period A consisting of 4 infusions (neridronic acid 100 mg or placebo) over 10 days, and a Follow-up Period 1 until Week 26. At Week 26, participants meeting the pre-specified criteria entered the open-label Treatment Period B with 4 additional infusions (neridronic acid) over 10 days and follow-up visits until Week 52. Participants not meeting the pre-specified criteria to continue into Treatment Period B continued in Follow-up Period 2 until Week 52.

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, single arm post-approval study is to demonstrate continued safety of the Axium and Proclaim Neurostimulator System for dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. The primary endpoint is the 12-month serious adverse event rate for permanent implants.

The first purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the stellate ganglion block realized with two different approaches (blind and ultrasound-guided) in patients with a diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. The second purpose of this study is to determine the safest approach and to compare the safety profiles of the two approaches.

The purpose of this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide in adult subjects with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1.

This study will examine the effectiveness of the drug neurotropin in treating chronic pain after injury to a limb or a large nerve. Two groups of patients will participate in this study: patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1, or CRPS-I (also called reflex sympathetic dystrophy) and patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 2, or CRPS-II. CRPS-I is pain that develops after relatively minor injury to an arm or leg, but lasts much longer and is much more severe than would normally be expected. CRPS-II is pain resulting from injury to a large nerve. Candidates will have a history and physical examination, blood tests, and electrocardiogram. Participants will undergo the following tests and procedures: Patients with CRPS I and II will receive an individualized regimen of physical therapy and standard treatment to control their pain. In addition, they will receive neurotropin or placebo tablets for 5 weeks, then no trial medicine for at least 1 week, and then the other trial drug for the next 5 weeks. That is, patients who took placebo the first 5 weeks will take neurotropin the second 5 weeks and vice versa. Neither the patients nor the doctors will know who received which drug during the two intervals until the study is over. Patients will complete questionnaires about their pain, quality of life, and ability to perform daily living activities. They will have various tests to measure pain (such as sensitivity to heat and cold, to an electric current, to a mild pin prick, etc.); to provide information about changes in their condition (such as tests of range of motion of joints and limb size); to measure blood circulation and sweating in the arm or leg (such as measurements of blood flow to the limb, skin temperature, and sweat production), and other procedures.