Active clinical trials for "Crush Injuries"

Many critical diseases can damage skin and tissue integrity due to natural immobility, hemodynamic instability, poor tissue perfusion, use of medical devices and many other internal and external factors. Skin damage frequently seen in intensive care units; It can be listed as skin tears and secondary cutaneous infections, especially pressure injuries (PI) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). In the DecubICU's study, which has the largest sample number ever, published in 2021, the prevalence of pressure ulcers and related factors in 1117 intensive care units from 90 different countries were evaluated; Pressure ulcers were detected in 6747 of 13,254 patients hospitalized in the ICU, and 57% of these wounds were reported to be associated with the intensive care unit. In addition to pressure injuries, another skin problem that has also been focused on in nursing science in the last 10 years; incontinence-associated dermatitis. IAD, which develops on the skin exposed to urine and faeces, is not only a skin damage that needs to be examined on its own, but also paves the way for the development of pressure sores and can also progress together with pressure injuries. The study which was published in 2018, examined 109 intensive care patients, while the incidence of IAD was determined as 23.6%, while in 2019 another study in which 351 patients were included for 52 weeks, annual prevalence of IAD ranged from 17% and weekly incidences ranged from 0-70%. The findings of three different studies conducted in the intensive care unit are that IAD developed in 6% of 112 patients, 26.2% of 145 patients, and 65.4% of 266 patients, respectively. However, despite the limited literature, the high prevalence rates and the strong relationship between pressure injuries and incontinence associated dermatitis point to the necessity of evaluating these two skin injuries together. Each existing skin injury reduces the quality of life by causing pain and pain to the individual, and also increases hospitalizations and infection rates, placing a financial burden on the health system and causing loss of workforce. For all these reasons, skin problems are considered as a quality indicator in hospitals and the primary responsibility for maintaining skin integrity is attributed to nurses. Guidelines published by EPUAP, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (PPPIA) in 2019 in the prevention of pressure injuries in intensive care units play a key role in determining nurses' attempts to preserve skin and tissue integrity. In the prevention of incontinence-related dermatitis, the best practices guide published by Dimitri Beckmann in 2015 should be integrated into clinics. Furthermore, the person-centered approach in skin care has been considered as a concept that should be focused on by the authors in recent years, and in a systematic review published in 2020, clinical applications of the person-centered care approach in wound care were suggested by considering the current evidence. However, the resources in which prevention strategies are focused on individual-centered care are very limited. Therefore, in this study, it was aimed to develop a critical patient-centered skin care protocol and to examine the effects of this protocol on the barrier functions of the skin. HYPOTHESES AND DETAILED AIMS ARE BELOW. The primary aim of the study is to examine the effect of critical patient centered skin care on the barrier function of the skin. The hypotheses for the primary purpose of this study are as follows: H0: Application of critical patient-centered skin care protocol has no effect on skin barrier function (skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, skin pH, and secondary infection). H1: Application of critical patient-centered skin care protocol has an effect on the barrier function of the skin (skin temperature, transepidermal water loss, skin pH, and secondary infection). The secondary aim of the study is to examine the effects critical patient-centered skin care on the incidence and development time of incontinence-associated dermatitis and pressure injuries. In this direction, the hypotheses for the secondary purpose of this study are as follows: H0: Application of critical patient-centered skin care protocol has no effect on the incidence of incontinence associated dermatitis and the incidence of pressure injury and their development times. H1: Application of critical patient-centered skin care protocol has an effect on the incidence of incontinence associated dermatitis and the incidence of pressure injury and their development times.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of an individualized nutrition intervention package on pressure injury healing rates, prevention of new pressure injuries, complications, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness in adult on home nursing care with pressure injuries staged II and above in Singapore. Study Design: A two-group, non-blinded, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Location/ Setting: Community Participants: Adults (aged 21 years and above) receiving home nursing care with at least one pressure injury (Stage II, III, IV, or Unstageable). 190 subjects per arm Intervention: The intervention group will receive an individualized nutrition intervention package consisting of individualized nutritional supplementation, specialized nutritional education pamphlets, regular dietetic support via home visits or telehealth, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care. The control group will receive specialized nutritional educational pamphlets, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care, with or without nutritional supplementation. Outcome Measures: Main outcomes of wound area reduction, and proportion of participants with >40% area reduction at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants and wounds with increasing severity of PI stages (e.g., stage II to stage III), improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and nutritional status, and incidence of wound infections at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days, proportion of participants with complete healing, mortality and unplanned hospital admissions. Economic Evaluation: The primary economic outcome will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per pressure injury prevented, with a time horizon of 1 year for intervention versus control during the period of intervention (3-months) and up to a year. Statistical Analyses: Individual patient level analysis will be performed as per our primary analysis, and we will also perform cluster level analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) will be determined using Cox proportional hazards models and their corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). Imbalances in individual level data will be accounted for using statistical adjustment in a Mixed-Effects Cox Regression model. Hypothesis: This study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a individualized and protocolized nutrition intervention package for pressure injury management in home care patients. The findings could inform the development of evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for nutritional care and education in this vulnerable population, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs associated with pressure injuries.

A prospective, multi centre, interventional, non-comparator, open label study to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and performance of ConvaFoam™ dressings in the management of indicated chronic wound types.

This is an observational study designed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of Myriad™ in soft tissue reconstruction procedures. The study will enroll participants who are undergoing a surgical procedure, where the attending physician will use Myriad™ as part of the surgical intervention.

A clinical trial will be carried out comparing the efficacy of PICO system based on negative pressure therapy (NPT) in adults with chronic ulcers compared to conventional treatments.

Pediatric population is at a high-risk of pressure injury (PI). Patients undergoing liver transplantation are more prone to PIs compared with other types of surgery. However, there is a lack of sensitive and specific assessment tools for the risk of PI in patients undergoing liver transplantation. How to accurately predict the incidence of PI in patients undergoing liver transplantation is needs to be urgently eliminated. The study is conducted in the Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University which is the largest liver transplantation center in China.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of single dose 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) on the diagnosis of severing vs non-severing nerve injury after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injury. The investigational treatment will be used to test the hypothesis that 4-aminopyridine can speed the determination of nerve continuity after peripheral nerve traction and/or crush injuries allowing the identification of incomplete injuries earlier than standard electrodiagnostic (EDX) and clinical assessment. Participants will be randomized to one of two groups to determine the order of treatment they receive (drug and placebo vs placebo and drug). Participants will undergo baseline testing for nerve assessment, receive either drug or placebo based on randomization and undergo hourly sensory and motor evaluation, EDX testing and serum 4AP levels for three hours after dosing. Participants will then repeat this with the crossover arm.

This validation study investigates the diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma using two alternative gradings systems including the TEED and the OGS grading systems. Background There are two grading systems used to grade otic barotrauma. They include the Teed Score (TEED) and the O'Neill Grading System (OGS). Teed has been utilized more extensively but among physicians has been found to have limitations. The OGS is an alternative grading system with less classification categories than what the Teed classification system utilizes. The OGS system is tied directly to treatment decision making, specific to the respective grading level. Methods This study will utilize a sample of clinical examiners who will independently grade 120 digital color photos of actual patient tympanic membranes with and without evidence of eustachian tube dysfunction and middle ear barotrauma including variable stages or grades of otic barotrauma. They will use the TEED chart as a reference in selecting the appropriate TEED score for each of the photos. Simultaneously they will also utilize the OGS chart as a reference in selecting the appropriate OGS grade for each of the photos. The grading will be conducted by physicians, nurses, and technicians. This will allow for comparisons at varying provider levels. The comparisons will be made using the kappa statistics across the disciplines. This will allow comparison between observed agreement, and expected agreement due to chance for all reviewers. Research Hypothesis Ho: There is no difference in diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma between clinical examiners using either the TEED or OGS grading systems. Ha: There is a difference in diagnostic precision and accuracy when grading otic barotrauma between clinical examiners using either the TEED or OGS grading systems.

In this study, based on the conceptual framework of Pressure Injurie development, the risk factors for pressure injury in critically ill patients provided by the latest guidelines, and combined with the current relevant studies on mucosal pressure injury, we prospectively observed and collected clinical data related to tracheal intubation patients in the ICU, analyzed the risk factors for the occurrence of oral MPI, and established a risk prediction model to help clinical and nursing staff to detect and actively prevent oral MPI at an early stage The study aims to improve the quality of nursing management, enhance the level of nursing services and improve patient satisfaction.

Background: Patients undergoing surgery are at risk of developing pressure injuries since they remain in a fixed position on the operating table under anesthesia for a long time. In the management of surgical patients, the prevention of surgical pressure injuries is the best strategy, requiring effective risk assessment and timely implementation of preventive interventions. Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative and postoperative patient repositioning other than intraoperative positions on the development of pressure injuries. H1 Hypothesis: In the preoperative and postoperative periods, there is a significant difference in the development of pressure injuries between patients who have been repositioned using non-surgical positions compared to those that did not undergo this intervention. Methods: This study has been designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria of the trial will be allocated to the intervention and control groups using a random number generator. The participants to be assigned to the intervention group will be placed in different positions other than their surgical positions on the night before surgery and until the first 36 hours after the operation, while the control group will only receive routine care. The groups will be evaluated in terms of pressure injury development for at least 72 hours until the end of the postoperative sixth day or discharge from the hospital.