Active clinical trials for "Ischemic Stroke"

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Timing Carotid Stent for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a highly effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO). EVT was proven efficacious in selected patients with symptoms onset or last-known-well time of up to 24 hours. With a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 2.3-2.8 to achieve functional independence, EVT had become the current state-of-the-art treatment for ischemic stroke with LVO. Nevertheless, more than half of LVO strokes suffered from functional dependence or death despite EVT. Futile EVTs were contributed by peri-procedural malignant brain edema (MBE) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Studies suggested that 26.9% of EVTs were complicated by MBE, whereas sICH was present in 6-9% of LVO patients who received EVT. The fundamental pathophysiology of MBE and sICH is blood-brain-barrier (BBB) disruption secondary to ischemia, mechanical and reperfusion injury. These pathological processes can result in increased tissue permeability, excess production of oxygen free radicals and inflammatory response that eventually lead to hemorrhage and edema. Poor collateral circulation, proximal LVOs, intravenous thrombolysis, blood pressure and glucose fluctuation had all been implicated to in MBE and sICH. However, these risk factors were either unmodifiable or not shown to improve EVT outcomes. The preliminary results of a recent randomized trial even suggested harmful effects of intensive blood pressure following EVT. With indications of EVT are expanding to patients with prolonged ischemia and large ischemic cores, enhancing BBB and neuronal tolerance to ischemia and reperfusion therapies may hugely impact on EVT outcomes. Recent animal models have shown that glucagon-like peptide peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) significantly reduced infarct volume and neurological deficits following temporary or permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. These effects were likely due to the anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties of GLP-1RA that protected BBB integrity and ischemic neurons during induced LVO and/or reperfusion. Investigator hypothesizes that compared to standard reperfusion strategies, administration of GLP-1RA in LVO patients who receive EVT may prevent the development of MBE and sICH, and improve neurological outcomes. In this randomized, open-label pilot study, investigator aims to determine the effect of semaglutide, a GLP-1RA, on the radiological and clinical outcomes in LVO patients undergoing EVT.

To determine effects of short-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy on hand function in stroke patients.

This prospective pilot study is intended to clarify whether the use of sodium valproate in patients with acute ischemic stroke can improve clinical outcomes, and to explore the mechanism: whether valproate could increase peripheral anti-inflammatory CD177+ neutrophils levels. Patients with acute ischemic stroke included in the study will be randomly assigned to low-dose sodium valproate group, high-dose sodium valproate group and placebo group. Besides receiving conventional treatment for stroke, 10mg/kg sodium valproate, 20mg/kg sodium valproate or normal saline were given intravenously for 3 consecutive days, respectively. The investigators evaluate whether sodium valproate can improve clinical outcomes and increase peripheral CD177+ neutrophil levels.

Background: For moderate to severe carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis, in the past decades, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The transfemoral artery (TFA) using Seldinger's technique has been the most commonly used approach for CAS. The radial artery is an ideal puncture site for cerebrovascular intervention. Studies have shown that nerve intervention through radial artery approach can complete most cerebrovascular intervention procedures, including cerebral angiography, carotid artery stent implantation, vertebral artery stent implantation, intracranial artery stent implantation, mechanical thrombectomy, aspiration, intra-arterial thrombolysis and so on. However, the current studies are based on single center small sample studies, and there has been still a lack of large sample randomized controlled experiments to verify the safety and effectiveness of CAS in transradial artery (TRA) . Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAS via TRA in patients with carotid artery stenosis through a multicenter, prospective and randomized study. Study design: This study is a randomized, open label, multicenter, parallel controlled trial. A non-inferiority test is performed to compare the primary end point between the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group will undergo carotid stent implantation via radial artery approach, while the control group will use femoral artery approach. Study population: Adult patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis ≥50% or asymptomatic stenosis ≥70%. Study outcomes: Primary end points: The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 30 days post-procedure Secondary end points:1. The incidence of death, new-onset stroke and myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 2. The incidence of death within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 3. The incidence of new-onset stroke within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 4. The incidence of myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 5. The incidence of severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. Other end points: 1. Successful rate of DSA. 2. Successful rate of endovascular treatment. 3. Degree of patient-reported comfort. 4. Operation time 5. NIHSS score changes post-operation.6. mRS score score changes post-operation. 7. X-ray exposure. Safety outcomes: 1.Occurrence of all adverse events. 2. AEs related to operation and device. 3. Incidence of adverse event of special interest.

This is a randomized open-label, with blinded outcome pilot study to evaluate the effect on inflammatory laboratory values and explore clinical outcomes in patients who present with ischemic strokes due to large vessel occlusions and are treated with either current accepted management, or accepted management in addition to transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation.

The bloodletting puncture is an external treatment for acute ischemic stroke by releasing an appropriate amount of blood with a three-edged needle at specific points on the patient's body. As a special treatment for acute ischemic stroke, it has been used clinically in hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine in China for many years and has achieved certain efficacy. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective clinical observation and mechanism research on this treatment method, as well as a lack of scientific efficacy evaluation standards and technical specifications. Therefore, we planned to explore the effectiveness, safety and accessibility of bloodletting puncture in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke through a mixed-method study of a multi-center randomised controlled trial and focus group.

A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI. The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, the investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.

English Synopsis I. Title of Study: A trial of BUN/Cr-based hydration therapy to reduce stroke-in-evolution and improve short-term functional outcomes for dehydrated patients with acute ischemic stroke-version 2. II. Indication: We use blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/blood creatinine (Cr) ratio≧15 as a dehydration biomarker. This clinical trial aims to determine if more aggressive intravenous fluid supplement instead of present treatment would yield a better outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke and a BUN/Cr ratio≧15. III. Phase of Development: Phase III, randomized double-blind control trial. IV. Study Rationale: We have recently reported a novel finding that the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine (Cr) ratio, a marker of hydration status, was an independent predictor of early neurological deterioration among patients who had suffered acute ischemic stroke. Pilot study was then designed to determine if providing hydration therapy, specifically intravenous saline infusion, to patients with a blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (BUN/Cr) ≥15 improves outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. The results showed that patients with a presenting BUN/Cr ≥ 15 who received saline hydration therapy experienced a better functional outcome compared with similar patients who received standard therapy. V. Study Objectives: Primary objective: To compare the effectiveness of BUN/Cr-based hydration therapy with standard treatment in early neurological improvement (ENI) rate at 72 hours for dehydrated subjects with acute ischemic stroke Secondary objectives: To compare the benefit of BUN/Cr-based hydration therapy with standard treatment after three months using measure of modified Rankin scale (mRS) VI. Study Design: Duration of Treatment: 12 hours Number of Planned Patients: 288 subjects Investigational Product: normal saline Endpoints: Primary endpoint: To compare the ENI rate between group at 72 hours. ENI is defined as the improvement of the NIHSS score by 2 or more points or a score of 1 or 0 at 72 hours after the onset of stroke. Secondary endpoints: To compare the rate of favorable functional outcome at 3 months. Scores <=1 on the mRS are considered to indicate a favorable outcome. Criteria for Evaluation Inclusion criteria: Acute ischemic stroke diagnosed by the clinical presentations and brain imaging is confirmed by a stroke care specialist. has a measurable neurologic deficit according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) the time between the onset of neurological symptoms and starting therapy are less than 24 hours admission BUN/Cr≧15 Exclusion criteria: no informed consent obtained initial NIHSS >10 prepared for or received fibrinolytic therapy prepared for or received surgical intervention with 14 days congestive heart failure according to past history or Framingham criteria history of liver cirrhosis or severe liver dysfunction (ALT or AST > x 3 upper normal limit) admission blood Cr >2 mg/dl initial blood pressure SBP<90 mmHg fever with core temperature >=38°C indication of diuretics for fluid overload any conditions needed more aggressive hydration or blood transfusion cancer under treatment life expectancy or any reasons for follow-up < 3 months Statistical Methods: The primary objective is efficacy using the binary endpoint of ENI. Descriptive statistics on continuous measurements will include means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges, while categorical data will be summarized using frequency counts and percentages. For the primary endpoint of ENI rate, the proportion of subjects with ENI response will be summarized by treatment group. The proportions of ENI will be compared between BUN/Cr-based hydration therapy (Arm A) and Standard therapy (Arm B) using two proportion Z test. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the benefit of BUN/Cr-based hydration therapy after three months using measure of modified Rankin scale. For the secondary endpoint comparisons between groups, independent t-test will be considered. Duration of the Study: 3 years (or From 01/09/2020 to 31/08/2023) End of Study : When total 288 participants are enrolled or meet the criteria of early termination.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel controlled clinical trial in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke. Objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SPT-07A injection compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke.