Active clinical trials for "Cystocele"

Compare operative times and complications of sacral colpopexy and paravaginal repair between two-dimensional and three-dimensional laparoscopic systems.

The cystocele is the most frequent clinical shape of the genital prolapse. It is a frequent pathology in woman which can impair quality of life and generates pelvic, urinary or sexual functional disorders. It's considered that 8 % of women will be undergo surgery in this indication before the age of 80 years. Numerous surgical techniques have been described and we distinguish the interventions according to the route (vaginal or abdominal), and according to the use or not of synthetic mesh (non-absorbable) to increase the anatomical results.

Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is a commonly performed, vaginal surgery for the correction of female pelvic organ prolapse. The original description of this procedure included the use of permanent sutures. However, permanent suture use in this vaginal application can result in some minor complication such as persistent vaginal spotting, vaginal discharge and dyspareunia. Subsequent reports on this procedure have utilized delayed-absorbable sutures in order to avoid these complications. Retrospective studies are conflicting as to whether or not absorbable suture provides as durable an anatomic outcome as permanent suture. There are currently no high-quality, prospective studies that have evaluated outcomes of permanent and absorbable suture for uterosacral ligament suspension. This study will recruit women scheduled to undergo USLS with or without other prolapse or anti-incontinence procedures. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to permanent or absorbable suture. Follow up will occur at 6 weeks and 12 months post-operatively. The primary outcome will be Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Exam (POP-Q) point C as measured at the 12 month follow up visit. Subjects and assessors will be blinded.

Up to 50% of patients undergoing pelvic floor repair experience short-term postoperative voiding dysfunction, increasing the length of hospitalization, cost and anxiety among patients. The mechanism behind this problem is the sutures placed in the pubocervical fascia during the cystocele repair. The cited benefit of bladder plication is greater cure of cystocele. The existence of pubocervical fascia and the need for placement of plicating sutures over the bladder have been questioned. The objective of this study is to determine if avoiding cystocele plication in women undergoing surgery for cystocele decreases the need of catheterization beyond post operative day #2. We will conduct a RCT of patients undergoing transvaginal repair of midline cystocele at the Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients will be randomized to receiving plicating sutures versus no plication. This procedure may be conducted with or without concomitant correction of other sites of prolapse. However, they will not have any procedures for correction of stress incontinence. This study will be powered to detect a reduction in voiding dysfunction from 50% to 25% of patients. Using a χ2 distribution, and an alpha error of 0.05, the required sample size is 58 patients per group.

Hypothesis / aims of study A RCT has shown that results of prolapse repair via vaginal approach could be improved when a polypropylene mesh is used as tissue support (1). However, non protected heavy-weight meshes were associated with a high rate of local complications such as vaginal erosions and dyspareunia (2). The aim of this multicentre study is to evaluate anatomical and functional results of an innovative low-weight polypropylene mesh protected by an absorbable hydrophilic film in the prolapse repair by vaginal route, in comparison by the standard anterior colporrhaphy. Study design, materials and methods This study involves 15 centres in French Private or Public Hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated to be operated by a standard anterior colporrhaphy or by an anterior repair reinforced by a specially designed mesh: UgytexTM (Sofradim, France). Ugytex is a low-weight (38g/m²) and highly porous (average porosity: 89%, pores over 1.5mm) polypropylene monofilament mesh offering tissue ingrowth and connective differentiation for a stable and long-term support. The mesh is coated with a hydrophilic film composed of atelocollagen, polyethylene glycol and glycerol. The absorbable coating protects delicate pelvic viscera from the risk of acute inflammation during the healing's inflammatory peak. Prolapse severity will be evaluated using the POP-Q system. In order to evaluate the patient's quality of life, the validated PFDI and the PFIQ questionnaires will be used preoperatively and during follow-up (3), as well as a validated questionnaire on sexual problems. The difference on one-year cure rate should be 15% (80% for the anterior colporrhaphy and 95% for the mesh repair). Then the estimated number of patient is 97 in each arm.

Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term (5-8 years) functional prolapse recurrence rate of the 147 patients enrolled, randomized and analyzed in the study PRO-CURE I.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Veritas Collagen Matrix in treating female patients with documented occurence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as evidenced by a cystocele.

The primary objective of this study is to compare with PFDI-20 questionnaire the functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and vaginal mesh surgery in the treatment of symptomatic exteriorised cystocele up to 4 years after surgery. The secondary objectives of this study are the following: to compare the two techniques for anatomical results based on the clinical evaluation of patients with POP-Q. to overall quality of life assessment and expectations of patients. to compare the two techniques for the long-term safety. The evaluation will focus on the adverse effects of long-term sexual and genital symptoms, urinary and digestive functional symptoms, and chronic pelvic pain. to compare the improvement of the functional outcome assessed by PFDI-20 questionnaire (matched-analysis before versus after).

Pelvic prolapse is one of the most frequent pathology in Gynecology. Recurrency of the prolapse after primary surgery is relatively high, 15-30%. Sacrocolpopexy has showed to be effective but it requires a long learning curves and is more aggressive. New meshes techniques seem to be effective, as well, with less learning curve but they are expensive and there are no randomize studies published. The investigators aim is to compare both techniques in terms of: anatomical and functional efficacy, cost, operating time and complications.