Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

This randomized, parallel controlled, clinical-trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema compared with 532 subthreshold laser photocoagulation.

An epiretinal membrane is scar tissue on the retina that can cause blurring and distortion of vision and lead to swelling, or macular edema. Despite surgery to remove the scar tissue(membrane peeling), residual swelling of the retina may continue to interfere with vision. In this study the investigators will inject an implantable steroid device into the back, fluid-filled portion of the eye. Steroids have been found to decrease the swelling in the retina. Ozurdex™ is an implantable steroid. Once implanted, Ozurdex™ is slowly dissolved by the vitreous gel that fills the eye, releasing the steroid. The steroid drug delivery system in this study, known as Ozurdex™ has been FDA-approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for decreasing swelling due to another condition in the eye. This study will help to find out whether or not this device Ozurdex™ is also effective for reducing the swelling of the retina in patients who have already had surgery to remove scar tissue on the retina.

Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is one of the leading causes of blindness in the United Kingdom's working population. It affects the macula, which lies at the centre of the retina, at the back of the eye. Damage to the macula can occur either because the blood supply is reduced (ischaemic DME), or because the blood vessels are leaking excessively (exudative DME). A chemical called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may underlie some of the abnormalities seen in DME. Studies have shown that VEGF encourages leakage of fluid from blood vessels and increases the stickiness of white blood cells. When white blood cells are sticky they can attach to blood vessel walls. This may cause small blood vessels to block, and lead to ischaemia. Laser treatment often helps to stabilise exudative DME, but there is currently no recognised treatment for ischaemic DME. Macugen (pegaptanib), a drug that inactivates VEGF, has been tried and found to be of benefit in treating exudative DME. Since VEGF promotes ischaemia, it is possible that Macugen will also prove to be beneficial for ischaemic DME. This has not been tested before. A healthy macula is essential for good vision. The innermost area of the macula, the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), is the most important part. The FAZ is enlarged when it is ischaemic. This is a pilot study to assess whether Macugen can reduce the size of the FAZ in ischaemic DME. The investigators will also assess whether it can reduce retinal thickness and improve vision in ischaemic DME. Thirty patients will be involved in the study for thirty weeks each. They will have their eyes examined and receive an injection of Macugen into the eye every 6 weeks. The study is taking place in the Oxford Eye Hospital and is being funded by Pfizer, the company that makes Macugen.

Although it is important in the clinical management to classify BRVO into subtypes based on the location of the occlusion (major or macular), few studies have provided such information[8,9]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with macular edema due to Branch retinal vein occlusion who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection and to determine the concentrations of cytokines in the aqueous humor according to the site of the occlusion.

The specific aims of the study are to test the following hypotheses: That there is a difference in change in visual acuity resulting from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab compared with dexamethasone implant in eyes with advanced macular oedema That there is a difference in degree of resolution of macular oedema resulting from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab compared with dexamethasone implant in eyes with advanced macular oedema That both intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implants have a manageable and acceptable safety profile in eyes with diabetic macular oedema

Branch retinal vein occlusion is a leading cause of vision loss. Treatment with ranibizumab (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor) on a monthly basis has been associated with improved vision results. There is a subgroup of patients with peripheral nonperfusion on ultrawidefield angiography that appears to be more dependent on anti-VEGF treatment. In this trial the investigators compare the gold standard of monthly ranibizumab injections with ranibizumab + peripheral scatter laser to the areas of nonperfusion on angiography. Each group will have monthly injections for the first six months, then as needed by either visual acuity decrease or increased retinal thickness for the subsequent six months. The primary outcome is visual acuity. Secondary outcomes are reduction in optical coherence tomography, and number of ranibizumab injections

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) compared to ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

This study will compare the safety and efficacy of the 700 ug dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Intravitreal injections of pegaptanib every 4 weeks will be efficacious in treating Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), as compared to injections every 6 weeks.

This clinical trial is designed to investigate differences in terms of efficacy (mean change in best corrected visual acuity obtained after 12 months of treatment) and safety, of 3 therapeutic estrategies for non-tractional macular edema in diabetic patients: a) laser alone; b) laser plus tiramcinolon; and c) laser plus bevacizumab.