Active clinical trials for "Death"

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if patients who have brittle type 1 diabetes receiving an islet transplantation will have better control of their sugars if they also receive one of 2 types of immune cells along with the islet transplant. The participants will receive either their own immune cells, called regulatory T cells, or immune cells from the bone marrow of the islet donor.

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: palliative care recommends discussing advance care planning (ACP) when patients' estimated life expectancy is reduced from a year to months. Discussions about ACP focus on communication among patients, their caregivers, and healthcare providers to achieve cancer-related treatment and care consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals. ACP can improve outcomes for patients and caregivers; however, provision of ACP to patients remain low. This may be because of the complexity of ACP in clinical practice. A Question Prompt List (QPL) is a structured question list encouraging patients to put forward their queries to physicians and promote discussion between patients and physicians during medical consultations. Our preliminary study found that for patients with advanced cancer after standard chemotherapy, face-to-face interventions by nurses or clinical psychologists using a QPL about treatment and care, which is consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals promoted empathetic communication between patients and their physicians. In recent years, however, ensuring adequate time during outpatient visits has become difficult due to increased numbers of outpatients and shortages of corresponding medical personnel. Therefore, intervention methods not restricted by location or time are needed. Thus, the investigators develop a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, including a QPL, to facilitate discussions about patients' values and goals with their physicians. Purpose: This study examines whether a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, which intends to promote ACP discussions in earlier stages of advanced cancer treatment, improves such communication behaviors of patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. Main contents of the intervention: Patients in the intervention group are provided a mobile-based empathetic communication support program-a mobile application (app). The app comprises a QPL (46 questions in eight categories) and questions about the patient's preferred treatment and end-of-life care based on their values and goals. After registering on the app, patients are first given a program overview and instructions for using the app. Then, they proceed with the content themselves, at home or anywhere else, at any time. Between app registration and the next outpatient visit, the patient is interviewed (by phone or in person) by a nurse or a clinical psychologist, who helps them prepare for the discussion with the physician and asks questions based on the patient's app responses for 30 minutes to an hour. During the outpatient visit, patients and their physicians are provided feedback based on the interview. Study participants: Overall, 264 patients with advanced or recurrent cancer are recruited from four departments (respiratory medicine, gastroenterology, hepatobiliary medicine, and oncology) in the outpatient clinic of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Outcome measurement: The primary outcome of this trial is the Reassurance and Emotional support score of physician behavior measured using the SHARE model at the first visit after the intervention. SHARE is a conceptual communication skills model comprising 26 items and four subscales, categorized as S: Supportive environment, H: How to deliver bad news, A: Additional information, and RE: Reassurance and Emotional support. Reassurance and Emotional support assesses physicians' behavior in providing reassurance and addressing patients' emotions with empathetic responses (e.g., remaining silent out of concern for patient's feelings or accepting patient's expression of emotions). The conversation between patients and the physicians is audio-recorded, and a third person's impression of the physician's communication behavior during the outpatient consultation is scored on a 5-point scale from 0: not applicable at all to 4: strongly applicable. Scoring will be conducted by multiple raters blinded to the assignment. Raters are trained in conversation analysis with a manual, and inter- and intra-rater agreements will be checked in advance. Secondary outcomes are as follows: 1) the patient-physician behavioral assessment based on the conversation analysis manual, 2) number of conversations about ACP, 3) psychological distress, 4) quality of life, 5) medical care use, 6) app use, 7) feasibility of intervention program, 8) patients' satisfaction of the consultation, 9) care goals, and 10) preferred place for future care. The investigators chose these outcomes for their comparability with previous studies.

For family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, preparedness for caregiving is crucial for maintaining health and quality of life both during care and after the death of the patient. This project contributes to earlier research funded by the Swedish Cancer Society, about an intervention that was delivered by a multi-professional team and proved to be successful in promoting preparedness. However, such interventions are often costly and logistically challenging. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has further significantly raised the need for digital alternatives in healthcare. As a possible solution, an evidence-based intervention, narstaende.se, has been developed consisting of recorded videos of conversations between clinicians and family caregivers (actors), linked to informational texts and a moderated chat forum. The intervention was pilot tested during 2020 and 2021, exploring feasibility, content and family caregivers' experiences. As preliminary results are promising, the intervention is taken one step further and tested as a web-based intervention in a larger scale.

The aim of this research is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a shared decision making intervention and a patient decision aid to support patients with kidney failure, relatives, and health professionals in planning and deciding about end-of-life care together.

The entirely subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) (Emblem, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was introduced as a new therapeutic alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD in 2009 and implantations are rapidly expanding since then.1 Implantation of the S-ICD seems to reduce implant-related perioperative complications such as pneumothorax, hematoma and cardiac tamponade. The aim of this multicenter registry is thus to assess the outcome of patients following an S-ICD implantation in a real-world setting.

The proposed program, "Doulas - AC" will provide Dignity, Legacy, Advocacy and Support for Advanced Cancer: Reimagined End of Life Care in the Black Community." The goals are to: 1) provide a community-based, trained companion to journey alongside the patient with advanced cancer, 2) to help the individual explore meaning and create legacy, 3); offer support and navigation for practical needs of illness (e.g., financial assistance for food and housing, accessing and affording medications, transportation); and 4) to provide support and connection for the bereaved family/friends, including facilitating community connections for routine health screenings and access to mental health services, as needed.

For the purpose of organ donation after neurological determination of death (NDD), death must be declared using a set of standardized clinical criteria. When a full clinical evaluation cannot be completed, additional neuroimaging ancillary testing is required. The ideal ancillary test for NDD would demonstrate no cerebral blood flow, be free of false-positive and false negative results, rapid, safe, readily available, non-invasive, and inexpensive. No current ancillary test for NDD meets these criteria. Computed tomography (CT) perfusion has the characteristics of an ideal test for NDD, but has not been evaluated for routine clinical use for NDD. The overarching goal of this project is to improve the NDD process by establishing CT-perfusion as the ideal ancillary test. A large prospective Canadian multi-centre diagnostic cohort study will be conducted to validate CT-perfusion for the neurological determination of death. Specific objectives are: Primary objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of CT-perfusion compared to complete clinical evaluation for NDD. Secondary objectives: 1) To confirm the safety of performing CT-perfusion in critically ill patients suspected of being neurologically deceased; 2) To establish the CT-perfusion inter-rater reliability for NDD; 3) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-angiography compared to complete clinical evaluation and to CT-perfusion for NDD; 4) To describe the clearance of commonly used sedatives and narcotics in the setting of NDD; and 5) to investigate biological changes (inflammatory and nanovesicles) that occur in humans during the brain dying process.

This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study in order to evaluate the effect of end-of-life care awareness training to be given to intensive care nurses on the knowledge levels, attitudes, and behaviors of nurses. The study was conducted between May and July 2023 with 76 nurses working in the Anesthesia and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit, General Intensive Care Unit, and Cardiovascular Surgery Intensive Care Unit of Van Training and Research Hospital, who met the inclusion criteria. The hypotheses of this research: H1: End-of-life care awareness training increases the knowledge level of intensive care nurses about end-of-life care. H2: End-of-life care awareness training positively affects intensive care nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care. H3: End-of-life care awareness training positively affects the behaviors of intensive care nurses towards end-of-life care. Nurses who completed their undergraduate education worked in intensive care for at least one year, actively continued their profession (no annual leave, report, etc.), and were willing and voluntary to participate in the study were included in the study. Nurses who had a palliative care nursing certificate, had received training on end-of-life care by participating in a training program such as ELNEC, and had not participated in the training program of the study for more than two sessions were not included in the study. At the beginning of the research, the pre-test forms/scales "Nurse Information Form", "End-of-Life Care Knowledge Test" and "Intensive Care Nurses' Attitudes and Behaviors Towards End-of-Life Care Scale" were administered to all nurses. After the pre-test application, the nurses were randomly included in the training and control groups. A randomization list generated by a computer-based random number sequence was used to determine which group the intensive care nurses would be in. The "End-of-Life Care Education Program in Intensive Care" prepared by the researchers in line with the End-of-Life Nursing Education-Intensive Care program was applied to the intensive care nurses in the training group. The training program was implemented online for 45-60 minutes one day a week for 4 weeks. The same forms/scales were repeated 4 weeks after the training. Intensive care nurses in the control group did not receive any intervention during the study. Similar to the training group, the same forms/scales were repeated 4 weeks after the training. After the study is completed, the same training program will be applied to the nurses in the control group.

Over the last few decades the fast technical and medical progress poses a significant challenge to doctors, who are asked to find the right balance between life-prolonging and palliative care. Previous studies suggest that doctors (unconsciously) prefer to remain prognostically uncertain rather than to gather the information that is required to reduce uncertainty and to effectively timely take decisions in the team for the benefit of the patient. To obtain all that information, the doctor in charge of the patient needs to empower clinicians to speak up while guarantying a safe environment. However, creating a safe climate which enhances inter-professional shared decision-making for the benefit of the patient requires specific self-reflective and empowering leadership skills (including the management of group dynamics in the interdisciplinary team). The aim of this study is to investigate whether coaching doctors in self-reflective and empowering leadership, and in the management of team dynamics with regard to adult hospitalized patients potentially receiving excessive treatment during 4 months 1) improves ethical decision-making (primary objective) and 2) reduces the burden on patients, relatives, clinicians and the society (secondary objective). The improvement in quality of ethical decision-making will be assessed objectively via the incidence of written do-not-intubate and -resuscitate orders (first primary endpoint) in patients potentially receiving excessive treatment and subjectively via the ethical decision-making climate questionnaire that will be filled out by the team (second primary endpoint). In line with the DISPROPRICUS study, patients potentially receiving excessive treatment will be defined as patients who are perceived as receiving excessive treatment by two or more different clinicians in charge of the patient. The probability of being alive, at home with a good quality of life one year after admission was only 7% in patients potentially receiving excessive treatment in this study. Therefore, perceptions of excessive treatment by two or more clinicians are used in this study as a signal to initiate (self-)reflection in team about the quality of care that is provided to the patient and whether the treatment is in balance with the medical condition of the patient and the patient's goal of care .

Undertreated patient symptoms and resulting acute care use require approaches that improve symptom-burden. Previously a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention was developed for patients with cancer. In pilot work, the intervention was associated with improvements in patient symptom burden and reductions in healthcare use and costs of care at the end of life. This intervention will be expanded across several clinics to evaluate the impact of the LHW intervention on with cancer and the LHW will be trained to refer patients to palliative care. This randomized intervention will evaluate the effect on healthcare use, total costs, palliative care and hospice referral.