Active clinical trials for "Bipolar Disorder"

To assess the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Spanish population with Bipolar I or II Disorder. To analyse the clinical progress disease in patients with Bipolar I or II Disorder for 12 months using the assessment of the symptoms disease and the progress of metabolic and cardiovascular risk. To analyse the health status, quality of life and functioning/disability of patients.

Clinical practice indicates that Quetiapine has sedating properties, and its sedative effects may play an important role in restoring quality of sleep in patients with various psychiatric conditions who frequently experience sleep disturbances as part of their illness. It is well known that depressive disorders are very frequently associated with significant sleep disturbance. Sleep disruption is a feature of Bipolar Disorder during both Depressed and Manic/Hypomanic episodes. Considering that Seroquel has good antidepressant properties (Calabrese, 2004), the investigators suggest that Seroquel's effect on sleep architecture contributes to its antidepressant properties.

The purpose of this study is to learn about the effects of bipolar disorder or the use of antimanic medications on the mother's health and wellbeing during pregnancy and for the first postpartum year. Infant health and development are also assessed during the first year. Participation in the study includes 7 study visits, three in pregnancy and four postpartum.

Investigation of the impact of Zeldox on metabolic parametres in patients with bipolar disorder or with schizophrenia and impact of the treatment for the quality of life

This study will evaluate the differences in smoking behavior, nicotine intake, and nicotine boost among people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or no mental illness.

This research study is the continuation of a study started more than 20 years ago. The study was designed to explore the effect that depressed parents have on their children and to better understand the factors that contribute to depression development and maintenance. The study will continue to investigate if children have certain characteristics in early and middle childhood that predict the later development of psychological disorders. In addition, the study will continue looking at the processes responsible for the development of children of parents with and without affective (mood) disorders.

Metacognitive abilities have been scarcely investigated in bipolar disorders, with inconsistent results. This may appear somewhat surprising, as metacognitive training is a very promising intervention aiming at improving psychosocial functioning in bipolar disorders. One way to investigate metacognition is to address the discrepancy between objectively measured cognition (through neuropsychological testing) and subjective cognition (through self-reported questionnaire investigating one's perception of cognitive functioning). Objective and subjective cognition are two fundamental determinants of functioning in bipolar disorder. Objectively-measured cognition is directly associated with performance-based functional capacity but not with self-reported or interview-based functional capacity. In contrast, subjectively-measured cognition is associated with self-reported and interview-based functional capacity, but not performance-based functional capacity. Associations between subjective cognitive functioning and neuropsychological performances are usually weak, with a moderating effect of manic and depressive symptoms. Manic symptoms are associated with a decrease in cognitive complains, whereas depressive symptoms are associated with an increase in cognitive complaints. Predictors of the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in bipolar disorder are still weakly understood. One study reported that the subjective overestimation of cognitive dysfunctioning was positively predicted by more subsyndromal depressive and manic symptoms, hospitalizations, and BD type II. This study also reported that the subjective overestimation of cognitive dysfunctioning was associated with greater socio-occupational difficulties, more perceived stress, and lower quality of life. However, these previous studies had relatively limited sample sizes (below 150). They also ignored other potential predictors of the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitions such as psychotic features, impulsiveness, and childhood trauma. Moreover, they also ignored whether this discrepancy was associated with medication adherence. The present study intends to explore the predictors of the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in bipolar disorder in a cross-sectional sample of 387 stable outpatients with bipolar disorders (type 1, type 2, not otherwise specified). The second objective is to determine whether the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in bipolar disorder predicts functioning, quality of life and medication adherence.

In the recent context of deinstitutionalization and longitudinal studies pointing to a large number of positive long-term outcommes for people affected by a psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, eating disorder, severe personality disorder, etc.), the possibility of overcoming the consequences of a psychiatric pathology emerges as a solid fact. Therefore, the existence of this possibility calls for the identification of the determinants underlying of the various outcomes over time of those affected by a severe psychiatric disorder, in particular those likely to underpin the most positive developments. While it is well known from a medical point of view that certain dimensions affect the prognosis of persons affected by a severe psychiatric disorder (such as the persistence of negative symptoms or cognitive disorders in schizophrenic disorders), prognosis from a purely medical perspective (and putting aside the role of the person and his environment) seems to be able to account only for a modest proportion of the prognosis of people affected by a serious psychiatric disorder. It is this fact that has gradually led to the emergence of complementary models capable of enriching the understanding of the determinants of the future of people affected by a severe psychiatric disorder, in particular models inviting to separate "becoming of the person" from the " psychiatric disorder "to take into account the" personal role of the person "in his or her own healing. This perspective is the "recovery" perspective. Recovery process is defined as a personal trajectory which includes the person's experiences and the reactions of his / her environment following the installation of a psychiatric disorder, which can support a mode of release of the status of "psychiatric patient". Recovery thus implies an "approach underpinned by the understanding of the human response to pathology" (Noiseux) and, one might add, of its environment. However, while these studies point to a number of crucial dimensions involved in the recovery of a severe psychiatric disorder, one of the important limitations of these studies is the distance from any psychopathological consideration, thus setting aside the possibility of specific processes of recovery depending of the pathology. The identification of recurrent experiential logics specific to the various psychiatric disorders therefore appears to be an important field of investigation. It would potentially be able to guide the development of new therapeutic devices based on the recovery model.

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are dying younger than the general population; cancer is a leading cause of death in this population. People with SMI have higher rates of dying from breast, lung, and colon cancer, and disparities in treatment appear to be one contributing factor. Individuals with SMI may be diagnosed with more advanced stage cancer and less likely to receive stage-appropriate cancer treatment. Although collaborative care models integrating medical and psychiatric care have shown promise in other populations, the challenge of treating SMI and cancer is distinct and relatively understudied. Patients may have uncontrolled psychiatric symptoms that can impact their understanding of their diagnosis and treatment decisions. Oncologists have less training and inadequate time to address multiple unmet needs. Mental health care is frequently fragmented from cancer care. The investigators want to understand if it is helpful for patients with SMI to be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager when cancer is diagnosed. Optimizing psychiatric symptoms and facilitating communication between the patient, the oncology team, and mental health providers may improve care. The goal is to pilot a pragmatic intervention for patients with cancer and SMI that can be integrated into cancer care, is acceptable to patients and oncology clinicians, and may promote the delivery of stage-appropriate cancer treatment to an underserved population. Patients will be connected to a psychiatrist and case manager at cancer diagnosis who will follow the patient and communicate with the oncology team during the 12 week intervention. All participants will complete brief surveys at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Oncology clinicians will provide feedback about the intervention at 12 weeks. Cancer treatment received and healthcare utilization will be assessed at 6 months post-intervention.

The investigators propose to explore the link between bipolar disorder, anxiety, and suicide by investigating intertemporal discounting in depressed, suicidal patients with bipolar I and II disorder who have various levels of anxiety. The investigators will determine the effect of anxiety on their intertemporal discounting (small rewards now compared to larger rewards later) in a decision-making paradigm and investigate the associated functional neuroanatomy using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).