Active clinical trials for "Depression"

This trial aims to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) and two different forms of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in sustaining response during and after a course of continuation treatment.

This study investigates if a physiotherapeutic exercise program designed to relax facial muscles associated with the expression of negative emotions and to activate and strengthen facial muscles associated with the expression of positive emotions can reduce the symptoms of depression and improve wellbeing and quality of life in the affected patients.

Most of the current antidepressants for major depressive disorder (MDD) are based upon the monoamine hypothesis which cannot fully explain the etiology of depression. NMDA hypofunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. Therefore, this study will examine the efficacy and safety as well as cognitive function improvement of an NMDA enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of MDD in the adults.

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of deep brain stimulation in treatment resistant depression. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is deep brain stimulation effective in treating treatment resistant depression? Does deep brain stimulation improve overall clinical well-being and functioning? Participants will be implanted with a deep brain stimulation device. They will then be monitored over a 5-year period by using multiple questionnaires to track their depression symptoms. The device will be turned off at certain time points, unbeknown to the participant, to show the efficacy of the device when it is turned on. The device will be ON for 8.5 months and OFF for 3.5 months during the first year. Researchers will compare questionnaire scores when the device is off versus on to see if the device is working in reducing depression.

Depression in later life is a common health problem in aging societies. It is associated with poor quality of life, and increased risks of morbidity and mortality. People with severe depression may develop serious psychotic symptoms (e.g., delusions) and have higher mortality and disability than those with mild and moderate depression. Traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (e.g., Baduanjin Qigong) has proved to be effective in preventing and alleviating depressive symptoms among older adults. However, older adults with mental illnesses have poorer engagement and compliance with MICT programs. In recent years, as a novel type of exercise, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), which includes repeated bouts of high-intensity effort followed by varied recovery times, appears to be a promising approach for overcoming limitations in traditional MICT programs. Considering there is little evidence of HIIT benefits related to older adults with depression, the current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a 16-week HIIT intervention on depressive symptoms and other health-related outcomes among Hong Kong Chinese older adults.

Pragmatic, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial of ketamine vs. midazolam as an adjunctive therapy for depression. The main purpose of the trial is to assess the mood-rating score difference between ketamine and midazolam from before the first infusion to 24 hours after the final infusion, supplemented by a 95% confidence interval. There will also be a 24-week follow-up after the final infusion session.

Depressive Disorders constitute an increasing global health concern and available treatments for young people have not been sufficiently effective in haltering this trend. The novel group treatment program "Training for Awareness, Resilience, and Action" (TARA) was developed to target specific mechanisms based on neuroscientific findings in adolescent depression. TARA is framed within the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria and has documented feasibility and preliminary efficacy in adolescents with depression. In this study, young people (age: 15-22) with depression will be recruited from specialized Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Youth Clinics and randomized to receive either TARA or Standard Treatment (ST) until n=67 is reached in each arm. Outcome measures will be obtained before randomization (T0), 6 weeks after treatment start (T0.5), at 3- and 6 months follow-up (T1, T2). The primary outcome measure is Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2) score at T1. Secondary outcome measures are RADS-2-score at T2, clinician depression rating with Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised at T1,and self-rated anxiety with Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, 2nd ed. at T1 and T2. Other outcomes include heart rate variability and systemic bioindicators for depression from blood and hair. Data collected from subgroups within the study will include: brain magnetic resonance imaging and accelerometry. Qualitative interviews will be performed to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the subjective experience of being depressed and to what extent treatment adequately addresses this experience. A 2-year follow-up (T3) will be performed and presented separately. The study will be the first Randomized Controlled Trial to examine the clinical effectiveness of TARA compared to ST for young people with depression. The investigators hypothesize that (1) TARA will result in greater reduction of depression symptoms compared to ST and that group differences will be maintained or increased at T2, (2) the treatment effect of TARA will be mediated by improved emotion regulation, sleep, and psychological flexibility, (3) bioindicators for depression will improve more in the TARA-arm compared to the ST-arm, (4) it will be possible/meaningful to explore the contextual factors perceived to drive the depression onset and maintenance, and the extent to which the different treatments address these factors.

The lifetime prevalence of Bipolar II is 0.4% with the time spent with depressive symptoms outnumbering the time spent with hypomanic symptoms by 35 to 1. Regarding current treatment options, psychotherapy is effective for managing depressive symptoms, with CBT being particularly efficacious. Unfortunately, CBT is often not a feasible treatment option. Electronic CBT (e-CBT) is more accessible for treating various mental illnesses with evidence suggesting it can increase treatment adherence and patient satisfaction. Moreover, e-CBT is suggested to have comparable outcomes to in-person CBT in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Typically, patient-clinician interactions of e-CBT are administered through email however, this is an insecure, unsustainable, and non-scalable treatment delivery method. The proposed study will use the Online Psychotherapy Tool (OPTT), a secure cloud-based platform for the delivery of e-CBT. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using OPTT for the treatment of BAD-II with depressive symptoms, while also analyzing social, cultural, and personal factors affecting patients' experience. Participants (n = 80) diagnosed with BAD-II in a depressive episode will be recruited from the Mood and Anxiety Clinic at Providence Care Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Eligible participants will then be randomly assigned to either the treatment group (e-CBT plus treatment as usual (TAU)) (n = 40) or the control group (TAU) (n = 40) where they will complete the 12-week program. Participants in the TAU group will be offered the e-CBT program after the first 12 weeks if they wish to take part. Participants in the e-CBT group will complete weekly modules mirroring in-person CBT content and complete homework assignments that will be evaluated by a clinician who will provide personalized feedback through OPTT. Progression/regression of participants will be analyzed using the MADRS, YMRS, and CGI-BP-M questionnaires administered at baseline, after week 6, and after week 12. Personal, social, and cultural factors impacting participant experience will be investigated through an in-depth interview utilizing focus groups. The findings from this study will be the first on the effectiveness of delivering e-CBT to patients with BAD-II with residual depressive symptoms. This approach can provide an innovative method to address the barriers associated with in-person psychotherapy.

Depression is a common mental illness which is costly for both society and for those affected. There is a need for effective treatments of depression and there is a need to make sure that the treatments that are given are based on scientific findings. In this study the investigators want to examine and compare two common treatment models for depression - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Emotion-Focused Therapy. The investigators want to investigate what characterizes these treatments when they are successful, and seek to better understand what it is like for patients to receive these treatments. Also, the investigators will investigate the experience of patients who abruptly discontinue treatment. To investigate these questions, self-report measures, interviews and analysis of session recordings will be used.

Low income women of childbearing age are at increased risk for depression and often do not receive needed treatment. Investigators developed Mom-Net, an on-line cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) for depression to address the needs of low income women of childbearing age. The intervention program also includes live coaching to help the mothers engage and learn the CBT material. Mom-Net has been shown to be highly effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving parenting behavior and child adjustment, in earlier controlled trials. In this project the investigators are examining whether access to Mom-Net can be expanded by delivering it in Head Starts (HS). To address that broad question, the investigators will focus on two sets of scientific questions: Implementation Questions: e.g., Can HS agencies deliver the program successfully; do HSs choose to sustain the program after the research project ends; what agency characteristics are associated with successful delivery of Mom-Net); Effectiveness Questions: e.g., Does Mom-Net reduce maternal depression when delivered by Head Start agencies, with HS staff doing the coaching? Head Start agencies will be randomized to deliver either Mom-Net with the usual high-intensity coaching or with a low-intensity coaching alternative. Within each agency, depressed mothers will be randomized to receive either: 1) Mom-Net program; or 2) Treatment as Usual (TAU;) referral to community mental health providers). Mothers initially assigned to the TAU condition, will have the option of receiving Mom-Net at a later date. Mothers will participate in assessments of depressive symptoms, parenting behavior, and child adjustment at Time 1 (T1; prior to randomization); and Time 2 (T2; after the intervention period) and Time 3 (T3; one year after T1).