Active clinical trials for "Dermatitis"

There is not enough evidence to support the use of probiotics for prevention or treatment of AD in children in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to determine whether probiotics is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis with cow milk allergy.

The aim of this proof of concept study is to show the safety and efficacy of 0.5 % dermal roflumilast cream in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. 2-5 % of the body surface area (BSA) should be covered with a mild form of atopic dermatitis. In a 4-week treatment period 38 mg cream is applied two times daily on 0.5 to 1 % of the BSA. After a screening phase, a washout phase of flexible duration (max 30 days, time depending upon pre-medication), the 28 day treatment phase follows.As roflumilast is a potent antiinflammatory substance, a positive effect on this form of dermal disease is anticipated.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of product 0405 in pediatric subjects with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Product 0405 in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescent Subjects.

The study shall explore whether treatment of atopic dermatitis is equally effective with Phoenix medical device as compared to standard therapy (Hydrocortisone cream).

The purpose of this study is to determine whether extended information given to patients with contact allergy improves knowledge, treatment efficacy and daily functioning.

This is an exploratory study to develop methodologies for the assessment of T-cell mediated therapies via skin immune challenges studies in healthy volunteers. The study will investigate what is the most appropriate; skin challenge agent, time and methodology to sample and characterise T-cells in the delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin reaction. The skin challenge agents to be used in this study will be the neoantigen Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) and recall antigen Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD). Part A of the study will assess an intradermal (ID) KLH challenge in three subjects to assess if the immune response to KLH is initiated by the innate or adaptive immune system. Each subject will receive one ID dose of 0.1 milligram (mg) KLH and will be assessed for a skin inflammatory response. Part B of the study will assess repeat ID challenges 28 days apart; the objective will be to characterise the T-cell response to each challenge and the kinetics of that response. For Cohorts 1A and 1B, 16 subjects will receive an initial subcutaneous (SC) 5 mg dose of KLH. Fifteen days later the subjects will receive 0.1 mg ID KLH dose and the response will then be assessed 48 and 120 hours after the initial challenge. The ID KLH challenge will then be repeated 28 days later and the response will be assessed at 48 hours (Cohort 1A, 8 subjects) and at 120 hours (Cohort 1B, 8 subjects) post challenge. For Cohort 2, a repeat challenge of either 2 tuberculin Unit (TU) or 10 TU ID PPD will be administered 28 days apart, to 8 subjects. The first challenge response will be assessed 48 and 120 hours post challenge. The second challenge will be administered 28 days after the first and will be assessed at the same timepoints. The repeat challenge 28 days later will allow an intra-subject analysis and will determine if a subject can be used as their own control. Part C of the study will assess repeat ID challenges of PPD and PBS; the objective will be to characterise the T-cell response to each challenge and the kinetics of that response. For Cohort 1, 6 subjects will receive a 0.1ml ID dose of PBS and another dose 24 hours later. Each challenge will be assessed 48 hours post challenge. Approximately 2 subjects will have an assessment of their normal skin as a control. For Cohort 2, a repeat challenge of either 2TU or 10TU ID PPD will be administered 28 days apart, to 6 subjects. The first challenge response will be assessed 48 post challenge. The second challenge will be administered 28 days after the 1st and will be assessed at the same timepoint. The repeat challenge 28 days later will allow an intra-subject analysis and will determine if a subject can be used as their own control. The total duration of this study for Part A is 14-18 days plus up to 30 days screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 1A is 56-60 days plus up to 30 days screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 1B is 59-63 days plus up to 30 days screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 2 if 2TU is used is 45-49 days plus up to 30 day screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 2 if 10TU is used is 48-51 days plus up to 30 days screening. The total duration of this study for Part C Cohort 1 is 15-19 days plus up to 30 day screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 2 if 2TU is used is 42-46 days plus up to 30 day screening. The total duration of this study for Cohort 2 if 10TU is used is 45-49 days plus up to 30 days screening.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of ascending doses of mercury, aluminum and palladium metal allergens proposed for inclusion in a metal allergen panel. Optimal dose will be selected based on the lowest dose of each allergen eliciting a positive response in 70-90% of subjects tested.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of T.R.U.E. Test allergens in pediatric subjects aged 6-17 years old. In total, 11 allergens were evaluated; 7 new allergens on panels 2.2 and 3.2 and 4 previously approved allergens for which changes were made to dose and excipient.

This is a randomised, open-label, controlled study designed to investigate the effect of short-term neonatal skin barrier protection using a commercially available moisturiser on the prevention of atopic dermatitis and food allergy in high risk children.