Active clinical trials for "Dermatitis"

The objective of the study is to examine whether 8 weeks intervention with probiotics influence the eczema in infants suffering from Atopic Dermatitis. Furthermore the influence of the immunologic status and the intestinal microflora, inflammation and permeability will be investigated.

The purpose of the study is the assessment of the barrier impairment, clinical skin condition and bacterial colonization status in patients with atopic eczema following topical treatment with K201 cream and a comparator twice daily over a 4-week treatment period.

The purpose of this research study is to assess whether seeing other people itch affects itch perception in patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects.

Main objective:to assess short term growth in children with atopic dermatitis during treatment with tacrolimus 0.1% and mometasone furoate 0.1%. A singl blind randomised cross over trial including 20 children. The study consists of 5 periods: run in, treatment(1),wash out, treatment(2) and run out. Each period 14 days where the children will use tacrolimus ointment tvice daily, mometasone furoate once daily or moisturizer (in run in wash out and run out)

his was a monocentric, intra-individual study, that was performed in at least 45 valid cases (50% children ≥3 YO; 50% adults). Study duration was 168 days with five (5) visits (D0, D14, D28, D84 and D168) to the research center. Primary objective Evaluation of the efficacy of LIPIKAR BAUME LIGHT AP+M in decrease the SCORAD in child and adult subjects with mild atopic dermatitis after 14 and 28 days under normal conditions of use; Evaluation of the efficacy of LIPIKAR BAUME LIGHT AP+M in maintenance the SCORAD value in child and adult subjects with mild atopic dermatitis after 84 and 168 days under normal conditions of use. Secondary objective Evaluation of flares quantity and severity during 84 and 168 days of use; Clinical evaluation of the improvement of skin parameters such as erythema, oedema, oozing, excoriation, lichenification, dryness and desquamation of a lesional and non-lesional skin from the same individual site by dermatologist after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Self-assessment of the improvement of skin parameters such as itching, tingling, burning by subjects after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Evaluate the perceived efficacy, cosmeticity and acceptability through a subjective evaluation questionnaire after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Evaluation of the improvement in skin barrier function by the loss of transepidermic water through instrumental measurements with the Tewameter® equipment on AF and UAF after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Evaluation of the improvement of skin moisturizing through instrumental measurements with Corneometer® equipment on AF and UAF after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; The folliculitis incidence after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Assessment of the improvement of the impact of quality of life through a DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) questionnaire after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; Assessment of global tolerance through clinical dermatological evaluation and reports performed by the subjects after using the product after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days. Evaluation of total body skin dryness improvement after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days. Illustrative clinical pictures of one or two affected areas.

In dermatology, topical anti-inflammatory medications, such as corticosteroids, are the mainstay treatment of managing patients with atopic dermatitis. However, caregivers are often apprehensive about choosing a topical steroid for a variety of reasons. Many caregivers are not aware that clinical trial evidence for these medications exist, and instead may rely on anecdotal evidence in choosing to take these medications. Because fear of the drug is inherently subjective, it can be modified with appropriate reassurance and presentation of evidence. The goal of the study is to learn whether caregivers are more confident in treating a child's atopic dermatitis after being presented with varying amounts of information.

The main objectives of the study are: To determine if RNA recovery from tape harvesting allows for the identification of a disease gene signature (e.g., interferon [IFN] signature for lupus) or other biomarkers that may differentiate affected from normal or unaffected skin; To determine if the lupus gene signature is differentially expressed in the epidermis from active discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) or subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) lesions when compared with unaffected skin from the same participants and from the skin of healthy volunteers (HVs); To determine if the atopic dermatitis (AD) gene signature is differentially expressed in the epidermis from active AD lesions when compared with unaffected skin from the same participants and from the skin of HVs; and To correlate the levels of transcripts of targeted genes in the skin by tape harvesting with those obtained from the blood.

Radiation dermatitis is one of the most common side effects of radiotherapy approximately occurring in about 95% of patients receiving radiotherapy . Acute injury due to structural tissue damage, generation of free radicals, irreversible double-stranded breaks in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and initiation of an inflammatory response in the epidermis and dermis occurs within hours to weeks after radiation exposure. Radiation dermatitis due to pain and discomfort has an adverse impact on the quality of a patient's life.The radiation toxicities such as radiation dermatitis encountered in clinical practice are typically managed with a variety of topical agents such as water-based moisturizing creams or lotions, topical steroids, antiinflammatory emulsions, and wound dressings. Pharmacologic interventions for the prevention and treatment of these toxicity can be used to protect skin against radiation damage.Currently, there is no standard treatment for the prevention of radiation-induced dermatitis with demonstrated effectiveness.The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the effectiveness of topical doxepin for the prevention and management of radiation-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Despite the success of Omalizumab that neutralizes free IgE in blood and interstitial fluids, treatment of many allergic disorders remains an unmet medical need. Omalizumab was approved for patients having serum IgE levels in the range of 30-700 IU/ml. Omalizumab may not be effective for patients with much higher serum IgE levels, such as those with atopic dermatitis. Therefore, an alternative approach that targets IgE-committed B cells directly and inhibits the synthesis of IgE without binding to free IgE will be attractive. Anti-CεmX mAb, developed by Dr. TW Chang in Academia Sinica, binds human mIgE+ cells, including IgE-committed lymphoblasts and memory B cells. Such anti-CεmX mAbs should be able to activate B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, which leads to anergy or apoptosis of mIgE+ B lymphoblasts, and induces ADCC through their Fc portion. Depletion of mIgE+ B cells by anti-CεmX treatment would inhibit the formation of IgE-producing plasma cells, resulting in a long-term attenuation of IgE synthesis that would eventually lead to a desensitized state in allergic patients.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the extended release formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf®) in patients with severe atopic dermatitis, who can not be treated adequately with cyclosporine A because of side effects and/or non-responsiveness.