Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

Basal-bolus insulin therapy, which includes one injection of long acting insulin and three injections of short acting insulin is the most commonly used insulin treatment. However, many older patients find the basal-bolus insulin regimen hard to manage because it involves 4 injections and 4 blood glucose tests each day. It is possible that a simplified treatment that involves one injection of long acting insulin daily and two blood glucose tests daily might be equally effective. This simplified regimen, if effective, would be easier to use and might result in less errors. Therefore, the investigators want to conduct this study to compare using a single daily injection of basal insulin with the usual basal-bolus insulin regimen in elderly patients (age >65 years) with type 2 diabetes.

The Investigator hypothesize that Dapagliflozin will improve EPC number and function AND Saxagliptin in addition to Dapagliflozin (additive effect) may improve EPC number and function even more than Dapa alone, compared to placebo. The Investigator propose a 3-arm randomized, parallel group, longitudinal study of 16-week intervention duration. Participants will be randomized to 3 groups: Group A: Dapa (10 mg) + Saxa Placebo, Enroll n=15, retain n=12 Group B: Dapa (10 mg) + Saxa (5 mg), Enroll n=15, retain n=12 Group C: Dapa Placebo + Saxa Placebo, Enroll n=15, retain n=12

This is a prospective study to evaluate effect of Exenatide extended release treatment for 1 year on albuminuria levels in T2DM patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria compared to placebo.

A Phase 3b, open-label, randomized, multicenter, efficacy, safety, and tolerability study of ITCA 650 compared to Empagliflozin and to Glimepiride, as add-on therapy to Metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide in comparison to once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change in participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycemic control. To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on body weight. To evaluate the safety of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide and once weekly injection of dulaglutide.

Cardiac failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are two clinical conditions with a significant impact on public health worldwide. In the elderly population the prevalence of T2DM is constantly increasing as well as its incidence in all Western countries including Italy. The combination of HF and T2DM is frequent and leads to an increased risk of death and of non-fatal adverse cardiovascular (CV) events which justifies the frailty of this population. Although diabetic patients (pts) with HF respond to recommended treatments for HF, the effective and safe control of blood glucose levels is still an outstanding clinical problem, since glucose lowering drugs may increase the risk of CV adverse events. Insulin, used in about 30% of diabetic patients with HF, causes adverse effects such as fluid and sodium retention and unwanted effects of hypoglycemia. Even if insulin remains a milestone in glucose lowering therapy of T2DM, its risk/benefit ratio is still controversial, more so when given to old patients with HF. The issue has gained relevance since new antidiabetic agents, as the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT- 2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) analogues, with a safer CV profile have been made available. While the transferability of the CV benefits attributed to the new drugs needs to be assessed in clinical practice, the present study explore the benefit/risk profile of insulin in HF. Objectives: to assess comparatively in patients with heart failure and T2DM the benefit/risk profile over 1-year follow-up of two antidiabetic strategies, standard care with vs without insulin in terms of humoral and clinical endpoints including body weight change, all-cause mortality and burden of care components (hospitalizations for CV events and episodes of severe hypoglycemia).

This is a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active controlled Phase IV study to assess the efficacy and safety of Dapagliflozin as monotherapy compared with Acarbose in patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin monotherapy compared with acarbose monotherapy in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

This is a 28-week, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study a potential synergistic effect of Dapagliflozin plus Exenatide once-weekly in combination with high-dose intensive insulin therapy compared to Placebo in obese insulin-resistant patients with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c≥8.0% and ≤ 11.0%).

Primary Objective: To compare the effect of sotagliflozin to placebo on the total occurrences of cardiovascular (CV) death, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and urgent visit for heart failure (HF) in hemodynamically stable participants after admission for worsening heart failure (WHF) Secondary Objectives: To compare the effects of sotagliflozin to placebo on: The total occurrences of HHF and urgent visit for HF The occurrence of CV death The occurrence of all-cause mortality The total occurrences of CV death, HHF, urgent visit for HF, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12(KCCQ-12) score Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

The purpose of this study is apply a Brief Intervention (PST) in Diabetic and Obesity patient in primary care of Mexico City to improve their depressive and anxious symptoms and stabilization of metabolic variables.