Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1"

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease. This means that the immune system (the part of the body which helps fight infections) mistakenly attacks and destroys the cells that produce insulin (islet cells found in the pancreas). As these cells are destroyed, the body's ability to produce insulin decreases. The autoimmune process is thought to be initiated by a gene-environment interaction. The genetics involved in the development of T1D are fairly well understood. There is a higher risk of developing T1D with the presence of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR3 or DR4. It is also known that not everyone with these genes actually develops T1D. Therefore, one or more environmental factors are thought to contribute to the process of developing T1D. The consumption of the anti-inflammatory fatty acids, the omega-3 fatty acids, has decreased significantly in the past 100 years. At the same time a rise in the incidence of T1D, especially in young children has occurred. Because of the warnings to eliminate fish during pregnancy, pregnant women are consuming even less omega-3 fatty acids during fetal development. Observations have been made that children who have received omega-3 fatty acid supplementation have a lower risk of T1D. Omega-3 fatty acids could have a protective effect that may occur during pregnancy, infancy, or both. The mechanism of this protection may be due to the DHA mediated suppression of the inflammatory response. Patients at higher risk for T1D have an increased pro-inflammatory environment. We hypothesize that DHA supplementation during pregnancy and early childhood will block the initial pro-inflammatory events and prevent development of islet cell autoimmunity in children at higher risk for T1D. This study is a feasibility study to determine if a full-scale DHA supplementation study will be implemented. If a full study is implemented, the primary outcome will be to determine if nutritional supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids during the last trimester of a mother's pregnancy and/or the first three years of life for children who are at higher risk of T1D will prevent the development of islet autoimmunity.

This is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to test whether a clinic-integrated, low intensity, multi-component behavioral intervention is effective in preventing the deterioration in glycemic control, treatment adherence, and quality of life that commonly occur during late childhood and early adolescence in youth with type 1 diabetes. The study will also examine mechanisms and processes that influence the effectiveness of family management of diabetes during this developmental period.

Diabetes mellitus is a long-term multi-organ disease with severe implications that constitute a major health problem worldwide. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disorder in which the body's own immune system attacks and destroys the cells that make insulin. Exogenous administration of insulin is the primary method of controlling type 1 diabetes by regulating blood glucose levels, but this treatment does not reverse nor prevent disease progression. Our hypothesis is that when implanting stimulated total bone marrow by arterial injection directly into the pancreas, we will achieve functional recovery of insulin-producing cells. This study will include patients with chronic type 1 diabetes and absence of lesions in target organs. We will follow the evolution of patients receiving autologous total bone marrow implantation by selective catheterization and compare to a non-treatment control group. All subjects will continue to use insulin therapy as needed to maintain the best possible glucose control. The objective is to achieve a significant increase in C-peptide levels indicating a regeneration of the beta islet cells with a decrease in exogenous insulin usage in at least 70% of the patients. This study is a follow-up to our initial study in which 22 patients received autologous total bone marrow. The initial study was 100% safe but additional studies like the one described above are needed to show efficacy.

This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The aim of this trial is to assess control of blood sugar, safety, and patient acceptance of insulin aspart compared to insulin lispro, both in insulin pumps, in standard clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: This study is being conducted by the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, funded by the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with the European C-Peptide Group. The goal is to evaluate comparability and reproducibility of measures of beta cell function in type 1 diabetes comparing the mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST). These two tests will be compared to assess the relationship between the MMTT and IV (intravenous) Glucagon stimulated C-peptide responses as measured by time to peak C-peptide and AUC (area under the curve) values. Based on the understanding that type 1 diabetes results from an immune mediated loss of pancreatic beta cells, therapeutic trials and newer measures of beta cell function can be evaluated as endpoints for clinical trials. Direct assessment of residual beta cell function is an appropriate endpoint, as retention of beta cell function in patients with T1D is known to result in improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia, retinopathy and nephropathy. Endogenous beta cell function or insulin secretion is best measured by determination of C-peptide (which is co-secreted with insulin in a 1:1 molar ratio). Intervention studies over the past few decades have usually used measurement of C-peptide. However, the relationship between these or other measures of beta cell function has not been well studied. The relative advantages of one measure over another in terms of variability, sensitivity and burden to the subject is unknown. In addition, the optimal conditions for the conduct of the test need to be determined. An important goal is to develop an international consensus about the conduct of metabolic tests in the context of large, multicenter trials involving type 1 diabetes (T1D) by balancing the scientific data with the burden on the subject.

The primary aim is to evaluate the anti proteinuric effect of increasing doses of the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril: 20, 40 and 60 mg daily in type 1 diabetic patients with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. The secondary aim is to evaluate the effect on blood pressure (24 hour ambulatory blood pressure) and kidney function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)). The tertiary aim is to evaluate differences in response to treatment according to ACE/insertion/deletion (ID)-genotypes and other genetic variants in the genes of the renin angiotensin system.

Type 1 diabetes is a common chronic disease of childhood. It is not yet preventable. Multiple daily injections of insulin, tests of blood sugar, and careful dietary planning are required lifelong to prevent long-term complications such as blindness and kidney failure. Recent studies of potential risk factors in children with diabetes, along with studies revealing the immunologic properties of vitamin D, and experiments in animals suggest higher doses of vitamin D may prevent type 1 diabetes. For proof for human children, a randomized trial will compare groups at risk randomly assigned to receive either the usual vitamin D supplement or a higher amount, 2000 IU daily. This initial study is a small scale test of procedures.

This study will be a prospective, single center, randomized controlled parallel group open-label trial. Participants with insulin requiring diabetes mellitus who have been offered an organ for living or deceased donor kidney transplantation will be recruited prior to transplantation surgery. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to AP (6 patients) and conventional treatment groups (3 patients). At the end of the subject's post-operative in-patient stay, participants will have the option of wearing a blinded CGM at home for 4 weeks while treating themselves with multiple daily injections (MDI).

Recently, there has been an increased interest in limiting carbohydrates (CHO) intakes for improving long-term health. Low CHO (<30% energy from CHO) and very low CHO high fat (VLCHF; 10% CHO, 75% Lipid) diets are being advocated among people living with diabetes given their almost immediate favorable impact on post-prandial blood glucose levels and on hemoglobin A1c that have been reported by users. Adoption of these diets are met with reluctance by healthcare professionals due to the lack of information on their safety. Concerns include the impact on hypoglycemia frequency and glucagon response to hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, lipid profile, liver function insulin dose adjustments when adopting them in the context of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Through a series of interviews, people with diabetes following a VLCHF reported that the lack of support from HCPs often leads to hiding the fact that they have adopted a VLCHF diet. This is an important source of concern that can lead to additional safety issues. The goal is to fill an important knowledge gap about the effectiveness, benefits and risks of low CHO and VLCHF diets for people with T1D. The primary objective is to compare the percentage of TIR of adults with T1D following a low-CHO diet or a VLCHF diet versus a control diet for 12 weeks. The secondary objectives are (1) to evaluate efficacy of glucagon in correcting hypoglycemia in the context of restricted carbohydrates intakes; (2) to evaluate changes in HbA1c at 12 weeks and glucose fluctuations and % of time in hypoglycemia at 6 weeks and 12 weeks of control diet, low-CHO diet or VLCHF diet; (3) to compare key cardiometabolic risk factors (body composition, blood lipids, blood pressure and liver inflammatory markers and function) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks of control diet, low-CHO diet or VLCHF diet; (4) to evaluate the effect of restrictive CHO diets (low-CHO and VLCHF) on the composition of the intestinal microbiota (optional).

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is the most common form of diabetes among children and youth, and it is increasing around the world, particularly among children under 5 years. This is worrisome given the chronic nature of the disease and its strong association with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence suggests that markers of CVD are already present in children with T1D, making prevention a clinical and public health priority in this high-risk population. Despite this, a good understanding of what factors predispose children with T1D to CVD is still lacking. Our study aims to better understand in this population what individual, familial and environmental characteristics increase the risk for heart disease, how to best measure it early on and what are the potential mechanisms underlying the heightened risk for heart disease in youth with T1D. Specifically, we aim to: compare established risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension) with novel early markers for CVD (cardiac phenotype, arterial stiffness, endothelial function) in adolescents with T1D and healthy controls; examine the associations between these novel early markers with: i) lifestyle habits; ii) measures of inflammation; and iii) markers of oxidative stress among adolescents with T1D and healthy controls, and determine group differences in these associations; explore, across both groups, the associations between these established and novel early markers of CVD with neighborhood features. To achieve these objectives, we will compare 100 participants aged 14-18 years with T1D to 100 healthy controls. Lifestyle habits include assessments of physical activity, sleep, sedentary behavior, fitness and dietary intake. Blood pressure and lipid profiles will be measured. Cardiac structure/function will be evaluated by non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Aortic distensibility will be determined by pulse wave velocity. Endothelial function will be determined by flow-mediated dilation. Inflammatory markers and endogenous antioxidants will be measured in blood. Neighbourhood features include built and social environment indicators and air quality. Our study provides an exceptional opportunity to increase our knowledge on what factors predispose children with T1D to cardiovascular disease. Understanding the interplay between T1D, lifestyle habits and metabolic markers and CVD is critical to developing effective prevention strategies for these vulnerable children.