Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"

The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of HR17031 versus INS068 and SHR20004 in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Tele-rehabilitation (TR) which carries health services distant through using electronic communication systems is an important treatment option. Although TR studies in musculoskeletal system, neurologic and cardio-pulmonary diseases are effective TR studies in type 2 DM patients are limited. TR interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes has not yet sufficiently defined and more studies with different exercise protocols will be an important step for the clinical value of this intervention but also for it's application in clinical practice. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program on glucose control, functional capacity, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Study design: It is a supervised-double blind randomized controlled trial, comparing two groups (a control group and a telerehabilitation group). The duration of the intervention will last 6 weeks. Setting: home-based patients environments , only the first session in University of Thessaly for educational reason Participants: A total of 22 patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless sex, aged 40 years and older will randomly assign to a telerehabilitation group (n = 11) and a control group (n = 11). Measurements /Assessments Study data will be collected at baseline and after the intervention period ( 6 weeks) by two blinded physiotherapists, in University of Thessaly).

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of dapagliflozin add-on intensive lifestyle intervention for remission of type 2 diabetes in obese patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The study consists of a 12-months treatment period (in which they will receive either Dapagliflozin plus intensive lifestyle intervention or placebo plus intensive lifestyle intervention in addition to the background therapy), and a 2-month follow-up period after treatment period.

A trial of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to evaluate the comparative effectiveness between dapagliflozin and Standard of Care (SOC)

The purpose of this study is to collect data to help researchers identify factors that prevent certain individuals from receiving the beneficial effects of exercise.

This study will look at the long-term effects of semaglutide (active medicine) on diabetic eye disease when compared to placebo (dummy medicine). The study will be performed in people with type 2 diabetes. Participants will either get semaglutide or placebo in addition to their diabetes medicines - which treatment the participant gets is decided by chance. Participants will inject the study medicine using a pen-injector. The medicine must be injected in a skin fold in the stomach, thigh or upper arm once a week. The study will last for 5 years.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of canagliflozin relative to placebo on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) after 26 weeks of treatment, and to assess the overall safety and tolerability of canagliflozin.

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drugs dapagliflozin and saxagliptin in patients with Type 2 Diabetes who are aged 10 to below 18 years old and are currently taking metformin, insulin, or both drugs. Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin are both approved for use in patients with Type 2 Diabetes aged 18 years or older. Dapagliflozin (alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs) is available for use in adults in approximately 115 countries worldwide including the USA and Europe. Saxagliptin (alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs) is available for use in adults in approximately 100 countries worldwide. This study will assess how well dapagliflozin and saxagliptin work by finding out how these treatments affect blood glucose (sugar) levels compared to placebo (a pill that contains no active drug), in children and adolescents. Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin are considered investigational products in this study since while they have been approved for use in adults (patients 18 years or older), they haven't been approved for children and adolescents due to lack of clinical studies in this specific population. Patients with Type 2 Diabetes have higher levels of blood glucose (sugar) than patients who do not have this disease.The high level of sugar in the blood can lead to serious short-term and long-term medical problems. The main goal of treating diabetic patients is to lower blood glucose to a normal level. Lowering and controlling blood glucose help prevent or delay complications of diabetes, such as heart disease, kidney, eye and nerve diseases, and the possibility of amputation. Dapagliflozin is a drug that helps to reduce blood glucose levels by helping the kidneys to remove excess glucose from the blood and excrete it in the urine. It prevents the kidneys from returning glucose from the urine back into the bloodstream. Saxagliptin increases insulin production when blood glucose levels are high. Saxagliptin helps to improve blood sugar levels in response to a meal and between meals if blood glucose levels are not lowered effectively. Saxagliptin does not work when the blood glucose is low. Saxagliptin also helps to decrease the amount of sugar made by the body. Together, these processes reduce blood glucose levels and help to control Type 2 Diabetes. The subject will either receive one of the active study drugs or a placebo (a pill that looks identical but contains inactive drug). This study will be double blind; this means that neither the subject, nor the study doctor will know which treatment the subject will receive. Which treatment the subject receives is decided by a computer, purely by chance; this is called a "random assignment". For this study, there will first be a screening phase of up to 6 months if Investigator thinks that some of the screening tests can be repeated, followed by a 2 week lead in phase.Thereafter there will be a 26W short-term treatment phase (W1-26), and a 26 W long-term treatment phase (W27-52). Following this there will be a follow-up telephone call on week 56 and a post study visit at W104. At day1 visit after the lead in phase the subject will be randomly assigned to receive one of 3 treatments: dapagliflozin 5mg, saxagliptin 2.5mg or placebo in a blinded manner.This treatment will continue up to week 14. After week 14, the subject will be assigned to receive one of the following 5 treatments: dapagliflozin 5mg,dapagliflozin 10mg,saxagliptin 2.5 mg, saxagliptin 5 mg compared with placebo in a blinded manner. The drugs assigned after week 14 will be the same drugs as at Day 1, but some of the groups will receive them at a higher dose.Starting at W32 or W40, i.e., after the end of the primary endpoints, patients with background medication of metformin only, and an HbA1c value < 7.5% at W26 or W32, will undergo a third randomization. Eligible subjects from the treatment arms will undergo the randomized withdrawal of background medication, while eligible patients from the placebo arm will undergo, in addition to rand withdrawal of background medication a randomized switch to active treatment. Short/ long-term period study visits can be delayed by a maximum of 11 months in total. If the duration of IP administration is longer than 52(+1)weeks, the safety follow-up period should be shortened such that the complete study duration does not exceed 104 weeks(+7 days). A window period of -28 days to +7 days from the original scheduled date will be allowed for the Week-104 visit.If more than 12 weeks elapse between the HbA1c collection at W26 and the third rand at W32, or the HbA1c collection at W32 and the third rand at W40, the subject should not go through this rand as the HbA1c value would no longer be reliable to ascertain eligibility for the third rand

To assess the safety and efficacy of up to two REACT injections given 6 months (+4 weeks) apart and delivered into the biopsied kidney using a percutaneous approach in participants with T2DM and CKD.

Diabetes is the second leading cause of end stage renal disease in France (22% in the 2016 REIN register). In hemodialysis, its prevalence is higher, between 30-40% depending on the study. Associated with type 2 diabetes, a large number of patients present with overweight (body mass index or BMI> 25 kg / m2) which can lead to a temporary contraindication to kidney transplant by the surgeon, or even definitive once BMI is over 30 kg / m2. Indeed, above this threshold, patients are exposed to an increased risk of surgical complications (wall infections, suture release), hospitalizations and potentially transplant failure. A recent study based on the Kidney Registry showed that patients with a BMI> 31 kg / m2 were more likely to stay on dialysis than to benefit from a transplant whereas for each decrease of 1 kg / m2 of BMI, there is a 9-11% increase in the likelihood of being transplanted. The management of obesity in dialysis patients is important for reducing cardiovascular risks but also because it increases the chances of access to transplantation. However, current weight loss programs are disappointing. The changes in hygiene and diet rules integrated into a specialized monitoring program only allow a weight loss of 2 to 8% in 24 months for half of the patients. Bariatric surgery is, of course, a more effective alternative, but with a 10% risk of postoperative complications. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (aGLP1) analogues are a new class of antidiabetic drugs that have revolutionized the management of type 2 diabetes. In fact, they combine efficacy on glycemic control but also on weight loss. They are used in obese non-diabetic people in some countries, with a reduction in weight of up to 10 to 15% with certain molecules. In addition, they have shown an effect on reducing cardiovascular events in diabetics including with Chronic Kidney Disease CKD 3-4. AGPL1 are well tolerated with side effects mainly of digestive tropism such as nausea or vomiting. Exceptionally, these effects can occur from the first injection requiring permanent discontinuation of treatment. In 20% of cases, these side effects can appear in the first weeks. They gradually fade, spontaneously or after symptomatic treatment and allow titration of the drug. AGLP1 is currently contraindicated in patients with reduced renal function, that is, when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is <15 ml / min (MRC stage 5-5D), because this population specific was excluded from the originator studies. However, aGLP1 are small peptides that are not eliminated by the kidneys. Their elimination takes place through the general catabolism of proteins. To date, 2 publications have evaluated the safety profile and efficacy of an aGLP1, liraglutide (Victoza®), in diabetic dialysis patients. These studies showed that the 24 hour plasma concentration of liraglutide increased by 50% over the long term. The safety profile was acceptable with, as expected, a predominance of gastrointestinal effects in the first weeks of treatment such as nausea, vomiting. The authors suggest an adjustment of the dosages and a longer titration period to limit side effects. However, treatment with aGPL1 is effective with better glycemic control and an average weight loss of 2.6 kg over a period of 3 months. Studies show that weight loss under liraglutide continues beyond 3 months with possible losses between 4 and 8 kg at 6 months and 12 months of treatment followed 12. Liraglutide (Victoza®) is the analogue of GPL1 for which we have a sufficiently long follow-up (> 10 years) on its effectiveness and its short and long-term side effects. The main objective of this project, in type 2 diabetic patients on dialysis, as a temporary contraindication for transplant due to overweight, is on the one hand to study the effect of liraglutide on weight loss and control of diabetes, and on the other hand to assess its tolerance in this population. The expected benefit is to be able to facilitate registration on the waiting list and access to renal transplantation of these overweight patients, without having to resort to more invasive methods such as bariatric surgery.