Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus"

In the early postoperative period, hyperglycemia is frequently seen in renal transplant recipients primarily because of high doses of immunosuppressive therapy. Many of these patients have pre-existing type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, 10-20% of renal transplant recipients develop new onset persisting hyperglycemia following renal transplantation, known as posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). These patients need optimal glycemic control in order to prevent development of cardiovascular and de novo renal disease. Most of these patients receive insulin therapy following transplantation, as they receive steroid therapy and oral hypoglycemic agents are better avoided. However, as steroids are tapered and need for insulin diminishes, several anti-diabetic agents are initiated off-label, such as metformin, DDP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit nephroprotective effects in individuals with native kidney disease, with or without type 2 diabetes. However, the data regarding the safety and glycemic efficacy of these glucose-lowering agents in the renal transplant setting are scarce. DPP-4 inhibitors are glucose-lowering agents used in patients with CKD. For instance, linagliptin is used in all eGFRs without dose modification. The data regarding the safety and efficacy of linagliptin are scarce in patients following renal transplantation. Since patients following renal transplantation receive immunosuppressants and steroids, which may affect their body composition. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors on body composition in patients following renal transplantation is not well established. In this study, we aimed to examine the safety and effect of empagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor) versus linagliptin (an DDP-4 inhibitor) on the glycemic outcomes, renal outcomes and body composition in renal transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.

The aim of this research is to compare the immediate effects of one hour Soleus Pushup Exercise and treadmill walk in Type 2 Diabetic population on blood glucose level. Randomized controlled trials done at Railway General Hospital and diabetic centers of Rawalpindi and Islamabad.. The sample size was 66. The subjects were divided in two groups, 33 subjects in Soleus Pushup Exercise group and 33 subjects in treadmill walk group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique. Only 40-60 years diabetic people with clinically diagnosed type 2 Diabetes for upto 10 years were included. Tools used in the study are Glucometer

In preparation for the randomized clinical trial of a new behavioral intervention for preteens with type 1 diabetes and their parents, the study is first enrolling adolescents with type 1 diabetes to create videos about living well with type 1 diabetes. The videos will be used in the intervention materials for the randomized clinical trial.

Goals: to compare the effects of two distinct rehabilitation protocols (conventional shoulder musculoskeletal rehabilitation combined with aerobic exercises versus solely conventional shoulder musculoskeletal rehabilitation) on shoulder pain, function, strength, kinematics and tendon thickness in patients with type 2 DM after 12 weeks of intervention and a subsequent follow up of 8 weeks. The secondary objective of this study will be to evaluate the association between AGEs accumulation and shoulder pain, function, strength, kinematics and tendon thickness in individuals with type 2 DM. Methodology: is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, in which all subjects with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 DM (with at least 1 year of diagnosis), of both sexes, between 40 and 70 years, presenting shoulder pain (uni or bilateral) for at least 3 months with a pain intensity score from 3 points on a numerical rating scale for pain intensity, will be invited to participate. The main outcomes of this study will include the AGEs accumulation through skin autofluorescence measurement; shoulder pain through NRS scales; shoulder function through SPADI questionnaire and range of motion measurement; isometric shoulder muscles strength through manual muscle dynamometer measurement; shoulder kinematics through three dimensional inertial units measurements; supraspinatus tendon thickness through ultrasound measurement. All these outcomes will be measured before and after the rehabilitation protocols. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two rehabilitation groups: specific shoulder rehabilitation protocol group (SRG); or 2) specific protocol of shoulder rehabilitation plus aerobic exercise group (ARG). All individuals will be evaluated before starting the rehabilitation protocol (baseline) and at the end of rehabilitation (post 12 weeks) and 8 weeks after the end of the rehabilitation (follow up). For the statistical analysis, to verify the effectiveness of protocols over time, a variance analysis (ANOVA) of mixed model with Bonferroni adjustment will be performed for pairwise comparisons. Variables that do not meet the ANOVA assumptions will be analyzed by the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction a priori. In order to assess the secondary objective of the study, correlation tests depending on data distribution will be performed (Pearson or Spearman correlation tests). A simple linear regression analysis will also be performed in order to analyze how much the AGEs accumulation can explain the alterations in the musculoskeletal and biomechanical variables. The significance level will be set at 5%.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of L47 as an add-on treatment to stable metformin therapy in patients with T2DM. Approximately 30 subjects will be randomized into the study at up to two investigational sites. The study includes a screening period of up to 28 days, with a three-day, single-blind, placebo lead-in period; a four-week, double-blind treatment period; and a one-week follow-up period. There will be 2 inpatient stays (Day -3 to 2 and 27 to 29) and daily outpatient visits during treatment period. During the follow-up period, there will be 1 outpatient visit at the end of the study. There will be 3 cohorts of 10 subjects each to be enrolled sequentially. In each cohort, subjects will be randomized in a 4:1 ratio to receive either L47 or placebo subcutaneously. Subjects will monitor fasting capillary glucose (finger sticks or self-monitoring of blood glucose, SMBG) during the lead-in, treatment, and follow-up periods.

This study explored the effects of self-compassion intervention on diabetes distress and self-compassion.

A prospective, randomized, mixed double- and single-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over clinical trial to test whether acute treatment with an IL-1 receptor antagonist impacts insulin secretion over time during the cephalic phase, defined as the first 10 minutes after the first sensorial contact to food, in healthy individuals in healthy humans (Group 1) and in obese patients with type 2 diabetes (Group 2).

SWEET-REGISTRY is a multi center, investigator initiated registry in patients with diabetes. SWEET' is an acronym derived from 'Better control in Pediatric and Adolescent diabeteS: Working to crEate CEnTers of Reference'. Having the vision of equal quality care for all children with diabetes the mission of SWEET is to harmonize care to optimize outcomes of children with diabetes worldwide. Initiated with support of the EU Public Health Program in 2008 the SWEET group has over 10 years of experience in creating and sustaining a high quality professional network based on agreed standards of care, criteria for certification, international guidelines and quality control. While originally focusing on the European region, SWEET is currently expanding and has received increasingly global attention, with centers across different continents including Asia, Africa, North and South-America. SWEET extracts wherever possible the data from existing data collection sources and following longitudinally unselected clinical populations of all pediatric diabetes patients as an ongoing measure of benchmarking and a quality control cycle as well as a resource for scientific studies and collaborative research. The SWEET registry was approved by the ethical committee of Hannover Medical School and is associated with the AUF DER BULT Diabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany, which coordinates the SWEET collaboration. Each center has to meet specific entry criteria showing diabetes expertise and compliance with the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) clinical practice guidelines. The local institutional review boards of the participating centers approved the pseudonymized data collection.

In partnership with Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Sanford PLEDGE Study is a large-scale, observational, feasibility study of general population screening for T1D and celiac autoantibodies. Screening is incorporated into routine health care visits within an integrated health system.

Diabetes is a leading social and economic burden in the world. It is the main reason of macrovascular disease incidence and mortality. Prospective studies have demonstrated that high glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of coronary artery disease. Further, the predictive value of high preprocedural glycemia levels has been reported in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of the present study was to assess the predictive value of preprocedural HbA1C levels for cardiovascular complications in a large population of diabetic patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects the average blood sugar level in the past 2-3 months. As glycosylated hemoglobin has been clinically tested and standardized internationally, increasing evidence is recommended for routine monitoring in diabetes care. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) suggested that in the treatment of diabetes, blood sugar control should control HbA1c level below 6.5%. Although，there is evidence that controlling blood glucose can reduce the incidence of microvascular complications, in the past three trials, intensive glycemic control did not significantly reduce adverse CV events in patients with onger duration of diabetes.Therefore, most primary and secondary prevention guidelines recommend HbA1c below 6.5% or 7% to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus. The optimal target level of glycosylated hemoglobin is still hotly debated. In addition, there is still lack of evidence for the level of HbA1c in patients with major vascular disease history in secondary prevention of recurrence cardiovascular events. Therefore, to explore and determine the optimal level of blood glucose control is the focus of controversy in preventing recurrence cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. Investigator will combine epidemiology and metabolomics to study the effect of glycosylated hemoglobin on secondary cardiovascular events, and further determine whether to strengthen hypoglycemic treatment after PCI.