Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus"

Background: It is recommended that patients with diabetes type 2 keep themselves physically active and it is known that good muscular strength has a positive effect on these patients. Aim: To determine whether physical activity level increases and whether other risk factors for cardiovascular disease are positively affected by including measurement of handgrip strength as part of the regular care program for patients with diabetes type 2 in primary care. Method: Patients with diabetes type 2 who go to regular check-ups by participating diabetes-nurses in primary care are randomized to either intervention or control group. In the intervention group, handgrip strength is measured in addition to standard care. the control group receives standard care at inclusion. Handgrip strength is measured in both groups at 1 year follow-up. Physical activity level is measured in both groups at inclusion and 1 year follow-up with a questionnaire. Measurement of other risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity are measured at both inclusion and follow-up in both groups as dictated by standard care routines. Expected results: Measurement of handgrip strength can give health care personnel greater possibilities to identify those patients with diabetes type 2 who need to increase their activity level and to give them more concrete support. It is possible that the attention given to handgrip strength and physical activity may motivate patients to increase their activity level, become stronger and eventually reduce other risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity.

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a novel program-Family Support for Health Action (FAM-ACT) - to individual patient-focused diabetes self-management education and support (I-DSMES).

This RCT will compare the efficacy of Preventing and Reducing Emergency Visits in Diabetes through Education and Trust (PREVENT) vs. intensive home-based diabetes (DM) education [i.e., Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)] to reduce DM-related emergency department (ED) visits and/or hospitalizations over 12 months (primary outcome) in 230 blacks with diabetes, 50 years and older, after an ED visit. A moderation analysis will determine whether participants who reside in low- vs. high-need communities [defined by Community Need Index scores (i.e., an indicator of the built environment)] respond differently to treatment. PREVENT is a collaborative intervention of Primary Care Physicians, (PCPs), a DM nurse educator, and Community Health Workers (CHWs) that extends from the ED into the community. The CHWs will: 1) deliver in-home DM education to increase participants' knowledge and skills to manage DM; 2) use DM-specific Behavioral Activation to reinforce DM self-care; and 3) facilitate telehealth visits with PCPs and a DM nurse educator to increase access to care. The control treatment, EUC, is home-based intensive DM education. EUC matches PREVENT in treatment intensity (i.e., number and duration of in-home visits) and delivery of DM self-care education, but does not include PREVENTS's other active elements (i.e., Behavioral Activation and telehealth). The treatment comparison will identify PREVENTS's specific efficacy over and above EUC. We hypothesize that PREVENT will halve the rate of incident DM-related ED visits and/or hospitalizations relative to EUC. The three secondary outcomes are: 1) subjective perceptions of access to care; 2) receipt of DM Quality Metrics (i.e., objective indicators of realized access to care); and 3) DM self-care.

Regular physical activity is an important part of diabetes management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Increased physical activity has several beneficial effects such as improved lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and quality of life. In addition, a reduced HbA1c is often seen in association to increased physical activity. However, the effect on glycemic control and the acute glycemic response seems to differs between different types of exercise. This issue is poorly studied in adolescents with T1D and the mechanism behind this is not fully understood. The primary aim of this study was to compare the acute effects on glycemia of resistance and two aerobic continuous and intermittent exercise bouts in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Secondarily, the investigators want to compare the different exercise according to hormonal changes and expression of mRNA in muscle. At a baseline visit the participants was tested for maximal oxygen consumption (pVO2peak) and maximal strength (1-RM). The study participants then performed three exercise bouts and one control session (resting), each on 45 minutes, in a randomized order. Measurement was performed during and after the exercise.

The primary aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to determine if the integration of a Community Health Worker (CHW) into the healthcare team of children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes is associated with an improvement in diabetes control. The secondary objectives are to determine if utilization of CHWs is also associated with improvements in psychosocial outcomes, healthcare utilization, and decreased costs.

To compare in diabetic patients eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with minimal exclusion criteria, the efficacy and safety of Abluminus DES+ sirolimus- eluting stents (SES) versus XIENCE Everolimus-Eluting Stents (EES). At least 40% of patients are expected to be affected by multivessel coronary artery disease and 30% with acute coronary syndrome

The objective of this protocol is to answer the questions: 1) Within food supplementation options, are mailed stock boxes superior to food vouchers in terms of achieving glycemic control? 2) Is the combination of mailed stock boxes and food vouchers superior to either food supplementation option alone? 3) Does providing diabetes education in combination with food supplementation lead to improved clinical outcomes compared to education alone? To address this gap in the literature, we propose a randomized controlled trial to test the separate and combined efficacy of monthly food vouchers to farmers market and monthly mailed food stock boxes layered upon diabetes education in improving glycemic control in low income, food insecure, AAs with Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) using a 2x2 factorial design.

This pragmatic trial compares the effectiveness of virtual culinary medicine classes vs. standard of care medical nutrition visits to improve glycemic control in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes . Culinary medicine teaches healthy eating principles through a combination of experiential cooking classes and focused didactic sessions. The primary study outcome is glycemic improvement (A1c). Qualitative evaluation will assess participant experience, impact, and durability of behavior changes related to nutrition. A short term cost analysis will be conducted to inform program costs and cost effectiveness.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of a continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM, Dexcom G6) for the care of patients with type 2 diabetes who are on non-insulin therapies.

This study will be a randomized controlled intervention study that will collect pre-intervention and post-intervention anthropometric health data of men and women aged 18-65 years who have type 2 diabetes and who do not have type 2 diabetes. The information collected will be analyzed and used to compare to the post intervention. 12 participants who have type 2 diabetes and 12 participants who do not have type 2 diabetes will be randomized into either the DASH-FP (fried potatoes), DASH-NFP (non-fried potatoes) or DASH-NP (no potatoes) groups, stratifying by sex (male or female) and age range (18 to less than 35, 35 to less than 66 years old) in blocks of three.