Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus"

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the renal protective effect of ipragliflozin in combination with metformin on the percent change of UACR from baseline to 24 weeks against glimepiride in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with albuminuria. The secondary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QoL) of ipragliflozin in combination with metformin against glimepiride in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with albuminuria.

Dietary supplementation with antioxidant vitamins, such as Vitamin C and Vitamin E, reduces malformation rates in embryos of diabetic animals. However, human trials exploring the benefits of these antioxidant vitamins have produced unsatisfactory results in trials designed to alleviating diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, and preeclampsia in pregnancies. The investigators hypothesize that more potent, and better-targeted antioxidants, such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids(PUFA), will be successful in preventing birth defects in the offspring of women with diabetes.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of JNJ-64565111 in adult Men and Women (of non-child bearing potential) with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

The primary objective of this trial is to measure changes in hepatic lipid content using three common alternative therapeutic strategies to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not controlled with metformin alone.

This exploratory double blind randomized active controlled study is designed to assess the effects of a treatment with therapeutical dosage of sitagliptin versus therapeutical dosage of glimepiride as add on therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.

The TRACK [Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Comorbidities with Kineret (anakinra)]-study: a randomized, open-label multicenter study assessing the efficacy of anakinra in lowering HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) as well as changes in DAS28 in Rheumatoid Arthritis (R.A.) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) Authors: R. Giacomelli,(A,B) P. Cipriani (A) and P. Ruscitti (A) on behalf of the TRACK study-group; (A) University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; Background: Interleukin-1 (IL-1) plays a pivotal role in R.A., joint erosion and cartilage destruction.(1) Anakinra (a recombinant form of the naturally occurring IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), which blocks the activity of both IL-1α and IL-1β) has shown in a number of RCTs (2-6) to be effective in the treatment of R.A., in monotherapy,(2,4) as well as associated to methotrexate (MTX).(3,5,6) IL-1β plays also an important role in the pathogenesis of T2D: Glucose has been shown to induce IL-1β hypersecretion through inflammasome activation, while IL-1β induces impairment of β-cell secretory function and β-cell apoptosis.(7) In prediabetic subjects, the expression of IL-1Ra is induced by IL-1β and reflects the body's response to counterbalance increased IL-1β activity.(7) Levels of IL-1Ra tend to rise up to 6 years before the diagnosis of T2D.(8,9) IL-1Ra has been successfully used as a marker for the risk of developing T2D in subjects with metabolic syndrome.(10) As a clinical proof of concept, IL-1 inhibition with anakinra in patients with T2D has shown to improve the secretorial function of beta-cells as well as to lower the ratio of proinsulin/insulin and glycated hemoglobin/hemoglobin significantly, favoring glycemic control and possibly reducing the severity and prevalence of the associated complications of this disease.(11) Summarizing, IL-1 inhibition with anakinra has a clinical impact on R.A. as well as T2D. As from 6-10% of Italian R.A. patients have also T2D, this trial aims at investigating the impact of IL-1 inhibition on both diseases. Very recent data also show that T2D is a predictor of response to anakinra-treatment in R.A. patients,(12) which furthermore justifies the use of anakinra in this subset of R.A. patients. Objectives: [Primary] To evaluate the change in HbA1c between baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and at last follow up of 2 years from the beginning; [Secondary] To evaluate the efficacy on controlling signs & symptoms of R.A., assessing the remission rate at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and at follow up (2 years), using the evaluation scale of disease activity on 28 joints, DAS28 and SDAI improvements from baseline conditions over time points, according to EULAR response criteria. Methods: 200 patients in 28 Italian centers with active R.A. refractory to treatment with methotrexate and T2D will be enrolled and randomized to receive either 100mg of anakinra once daily by subcutaneous injection or any anti-TNF-alfa drug treatment. [84 subjects will be required in each treatment arm to reach 90% power with an alpha error of 0.05 to detect a mean difference between the study arms of 0.25 percentage points of HbA1c . The assumed difference of HbA1c is rather conservative when compared to previously published changes in T2D patients (11).] Anti-diabetic treatment is required to be unchanged for at least one month prior to enrolment. Patients will be invited to maintain dietary habits and lifestyle during the study period. Further details can be viewed on the trials website after subscription.(13) References: (1) Arend & Dayer, Adv. Imm. 1993; 54: 167-227. (2) Bresnihan, Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41: 2196-2204. (3) Cohen, Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46: 614-624. (4) Nuki, Arthritis. Rheum. 2002; 46: 2838-2846. (5) Cohen, ARD 2004; 63: 1062-1068. (6) Cohen, Rheumatology 2004; 43: 704-711. (7) Donath, Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011; 11: 98-107. (8) Herder, Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 421-423. (9) Carstensen, Diabetes 2010; 59: 1222-1227. (10) Luotola, J. Intern. Med. 2011; 269: 322-332. (11) Larsen, NEJM 2007; 356: 1517-1526. (12) Missler-Karger, EULAR 2013, Abs. FRI0219. (13) http://www.anakinra-ra-diabetes.org/ Disclosure: This trial is receiving support from Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB according to the Italian law decree 17 December 2004. (B) speaker fees

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of sotagliflozin dose 1 versus placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who have inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise. Secondary Objectives: To compare sotagliflozin dose 1 versus placebo for change in 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) following a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and change in body weight. To compare sotagliflozin dose 2 versus placebo for change in HbA1c, change in 2-hour PPG following a MMTT, change in FPG, and change in body weight. To compare sotagliflozin dose 2 and sotagliflozin dose 1 versus placebo for change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) for all patients, and change in SBP for patients with baseline SBP ≥130 mmHg. To evaluate the safety of sotagliflozin dose 2 and sotagliflozin dose 1 versus placebo.

This is a single arm open label pilot clinical trial that will assess patient-reported blood glucose levels before and after using the Control:Diabetes mobile app, while collecting user feedback and recommendations for further improvements to the app functionality and user interface. This study will enroll approximately 70 individuals with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. The study will include two online surveys (baseline and exit), one study initiation phone call, and will also collect data entered by the users into the mobile app.

The overarching goal of this proposal is to test the efficacy of a multi-component, high intensity intervention, technology delivered, diabetes-modified behavioral activation treatment (TECH DM-BAT) that incorporates: 1) diabetes education; 2) home telemonitoring; and 3) diabetes modified behavioral activation, delivered by nurses via smartphones is effective in improving metabolic control in African Americans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of Soliqua 100/33 versus Lantus in the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change within the overall population. To demonstrate the benefit of Soliqua 100/33 versus Lantus in the HbA1c within each ethnic/racial subgroup evaluated (ie, Hispanics of any race, non-Hispanic black/African Americans and non-Hispanic Asians). Secondary Objective: To assess the effects of Soliqua 100/33 versus Lantus on the secondary efficacy parameters within each ethnic/racial subgroup evaluated. To assess the change in daily insulin glargine dose within each ethnic/racial subgroup. To evaluate the safety and tolerability (e.g., gastrointestinal tolerability) of Soliqua 100/33 versus Lantus within each ethnic/racial subgroup.