Active clinical trials for "Diabetic Neuropathies"

The purpose of this trial is to determine if patients suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain treated with ranolazine will have a greater reduction in pain compared to placebo. Hypothesis: From the prior clinical observations, and analgesic efficacy in the preclinical animal model of neuropathic pain, the investigators hypothesize that subjects randomized to ranolazine will show a greater reduction in diabetic neuropathic pain compared to placebo.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy in subjects with Diabetic Neuropathic Pain (DNP) over a 15 week treatment phase.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REGRANEX® Gel compared with placebo when applied for up to 52 consecutive weeks to recurring or non-healing ulcers of the ankle or foot related to diabetes.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2a Study Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-DP-o-04 for Treating Diabetic Neuropathy

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile of orally administered tapentadol ER dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily in patients with chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) over long-term exposure of up to 1 year.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of the investigational drug, tanezumab, in adult patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether the combination of the the three drugs gabapentin, duloxetine, and donepezil are effective in treating pain in people with diabetic neuropathy or patients with failed low back syndrome (chronic back pain).

To demonstrate the superiority of ASP8825 over placebo and dose response in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Patients with diabetic neuropathy will be randomly assigned to treatment with either TENS or TENS sham three times a week during 90 days. Clinical determinations are: pain, levesls of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and RPC-us

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication to diabetes mellitus affecting as much as 50% of the population with diabetes. Symmetrical sensory neuropathy is by far the most common pattern, which often progress slowly over many years, although some individuals experience faster and more severe courses. Despite the frequent occurrence, the causes of diabetic peripheral neuropathy are largely unknown, which is reflected in the fact that no disease-modifying treatments are available for preventing, treating or even halting the progression of the disease. The consequences can be dire, as neuropathy frequently leads to foot ulcers, amputations or intolerable neuropathic pain in the lower extremities. Sensory loss may go completely undetected in diabetes, as there often are literally no symptoms. For many individuals, the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy can therefore proceed completely unnoticed, making regular screening the most important tool for diagnosing the condition. Unfortunately, unlike nephropathy or retinopathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is not easily screened for, as the condition lacks reliable markers for early- or progressing disease. Therefore, screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy currently revolves around diagnosing loss of protective sensation, judged by the inability to feel vibration or light touch. However, in their most recent guidelines, the American Diabetes Association has included screening for small fibre neuropathy using either the cold- and heat perception thresholds or pinprick as a clinical standard. Although this acknowledgement of the importance of assessing not only large- but also small nerve fibres is a huge step towards early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the overriding issue of insensitive, unreproducible, and inaccurate bedside tests for small nerve fibres remains. While cold- and heat perception and pinprick sensation are indeed mediated by small nerve fibres, the sensitivity of these methods, outside of extreme standardization only achievable in dedicated neuropathy research-centres, remain poor and not usable on an individual level. This lack of sensitivity has also become apparent in several large clinical trials, where the methods have continuously failed as robust clinical endpoints. Due to this, the hunt for a sensitive and reproducible method for adequate assessment of the small nerve fibres have begun. Amongst several interesting methods, two have gained particular interest (corneal confocal microscopy and skin biopsies with quantification of intra-epidermal nerve fiber density), due to their diverse strengths, although clinical application is currently limited to a few specialized sites. Furthermore, both methods suffer several inherent issues including that fact that they only provide information about the structure of the nerves and not the function. One method to assess the function of small cutaneous C-fibers is the assessment of the axon reflex flare response using laser doppler imaging (LDI) or Full-field laser perfusion imaging (FLPI), which has classically been studied using local heating. Unfortunately, this method is limited in clinical usage due to time-consumption. The investigators recently published an alternative method using a simple skin-prick application of histamine to evoke the response, which reduced the examination-time markedly. Before claiming the method to be a better alternative, the investigators do however need to prove that the method is as good as the original. In addition to the direct comparison of the histamine-induced and the heating-induced axon-reflex flare response the study will also assess spatial acuity in the same cohort as a secondary aim. Spatial acuity is considered as a measure of the sensory systems ability to code spatial information regarding an external stimulus. To investigate the spatial acuity, the 2-point discrimination task (2PDT) is often used. Spatial acuity has been shown to be impaired in several chronic pain condition. Additionally, it has been shown that the 2PDT may be a useful tool to understand the sensory changes in diabetes[8].