Active clinical trials for "Diabetic Foot"

The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly1 defines sarcopenia as a disorder of the progressive and generalized musculoskeletal system [1], which is associated with the increase and probability of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, physical disability, and mortality [2]. what is associated with increased and likelihood of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, disability physical and mortality [2]. For a long time, sarcopenia was associated with aging, affecting onlyold people. At present and after several research works related to fragility and theaging, it has been identified that the development of sarcopenia begins earlier in life [3], and that there are many contributing causes besides aging [4], [5]. This new knowledge has implications in the intervention of sarcopenia that prevents or delays its development. Sarcopenia is currently considered a muscle disease (muscle failure), based on adverse changes in the muscles of the musculoskeletal system accumulated throughout life, with loss of muscle strength such as main determinant [6], [7]. Sarcopenia has been overlooked in clinical practice, apparently due to to the complexity in determining the variables to be measured, how to measure them, and the values or cut-off points can guide diagnosis and treatment, and how best to assess the effects of therapeutic intervention [8]. In terms economic, the presence of sarcopenia increases the risk of hospitalization and increases the cost of care during hospital admission [9]. Diabetes is the main cause of non-traumatic amputation of the lower limb (MI), being foot ulcers diabetic the cause of 80% of the amputations of people with diabetes[10]. A study conducted by the Chongqing University Hospital showed that sarcopenia is independently related to the foot diabetic and that patients with diabetic foot have a worse prognosis if they suffer from sarcopenia. HYPOTHESIS: The surface electromyography (EMGs) signal recording of the foot musculature, will allow extracting biomarkers that allow monitoring and follow-up of sarcopenia in diabetic patients. MAIN OBJECTIVES: 1- Generate tools based on artificial intelligence (AI) using the database with the biomarkers obtained, in order to analyze the predisposing and triggering risk factors associated with diabetic foot ulcers, according to the IWGDF2. 2- Describe the profile of the diabetic patient in terms of degree of sarcopenia with respect to the population without diabetes in a group of adults. DESIGN: Observational study comparison between cases and controls: a group with the presence of Diabetes Mellitus and another without. SAMPLE: Approximately 16% of diabetic patients will develop an ulcer during their evolution and the Annual incidence is 2-3%, which doubles to 6% in the presence of polyneuropathy. Population of the Department of Health 168,978. Prevalence of diabetes in Spain 7.8%. It is estimated that there are 13,182 in the department people with diabetes. Confidence level 95%, expected frequency of ulcers 6% and confidence limit 9%, it was calculates the sample of 26 patients. 30 patients per group will be recruited. GROUP 1: 30 patients with Diabetes Mellitus. GROUP 2: 30 control patients without Diabetes Mellitus. The period of inclusion of patients is estimated at 5 months. METHOD: the assessment interventions will be carried out in two days. During the first visit, examination to identify risk to the foot: clinical history (PA, comorbidity data, previous injuries to the feet). feet..), examination of the vascular state, examination of loss of protective sensitivity, perception of pressure, skin inspection, inspection of bone/joint structures, physical limitations and level of knowledge of the foot care. During the second visit: diagnostic tests for sarcopenia (bioimpedance and electromyography), arthropometric measurements, malnutrition, dependence and activity marker tests. EXPECTED RESULTS: clarify some aspects related to the sarcopenia-diabetic foot binomial, and isolate risk factors for future prevention, by obtaining biomarkers with EMGs in lower limbs.

Diabetic foot ulcers are one of the complications of diabetes mellitus. These wounds are often the result of diabetes-related neuropathy and/or an ischemic foot. Even with great care, recurrent ulcers are common. To mediate the damage and societal costs that come with DF there is a need for applications to detect ulcers before they come apparent. Two of these promising techniques are Laser Speckle Contrast imaging and thermography. This study is part of 4 specific clinical studies and is aimed at determining Laser Speckle Contrast imaging and thermography features, the provocations that are needed to optimize imaging and the correlation between these features and the IWGDF risk stratification category system for the diabetic foot.

This pilot study examined the effects of ELO water, a commercially-available oxygen-enriched drinking water, on wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers over 12 weeks.

The objective of this single-arm feasibility study is to investigate the safety and impact of the topical EPC Silver Wound Gel (EPC-123) in the management of diabetic foot ulcer wounds not progressing under the current standard of care.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are challenging to treat with complicated healing processes and require advanced wound care. Piscean collagen has the potential to promote the regenerative process while remaining cost-effective and with minimal side effects. In this study, the efficacy of a piscean collagen matrix dressing was compared with a standard dressing of saline-moistened gauze for wound healing in patients with neuropathic DFU. This is a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial.

Background: People with diabetes and either current or previous diabetic foot ulcer disease (DFUD) are at very high risk for adverse cardiovascular events including heart attacks and strokes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications that have shown to be very effective in reducing heart disease and event risk. However, one recent study found that SGLT2i's may increase minor amputation risk in those with DFUD, though this finding has not been replicated in other similar studies. However, as a result, there has been limited further investigation into this issue and as such the use of SGLT2i's in those with DFUD remains a contentious issue, despite their potential for significantly reducing cardiovascular disease risk in this population. In the absence of further randomised controlled trials investigating the use of SGLT2is in these populations, there is a need for clinical guidelines advising on their use based on expert clinical consensus, including specific criteria or scenarios in which they should or should not be used. The Delphi methodology is an iterative survey technique that uses expert opinion from various relevant backgrounds and experiences to generate a consensus based upon various statements and/or scenarios. Aim: The aim of this study is to use the Delphi technique to generate expert consensus-based clinical guidelines on the use of SGLT2i's in those with diabetes and DFUD. Methods: This is a Delphi technique-based study using a purposive sample of convenience. Consensus development methods will be used to generate clinical guidelines, endorsed by key clinical groups, on the use of SGLT2i's in patients with diabetic foot ulcer disease, including acknowledgement of specific scenarios or patient characteristics that may influence these guidelines. The consensus group will consist of n=20 healthcare practitioners, including GPs, secondary care diabetologists, foot care specialists, cardiologists and pharmacists in order to ensure a breadth of expertise and input. Two rounds of the Delphi consensus process will take place, in order to iteratively develop the consensus-based clinical guidelines. This process is expected to take 4-6 months. The analysis will be on-going throughout the study and completed within 3 months of the last questionnaire round of the Delphi process.

Overall project design: This PhD project involves a randomized study on diabetic individuals with healing resistant wounds, comparing the effect of passive movement of the lower limb with standard treatment of diabetic wounds. How to effectively improve the condition of peripheral arterial disease is limited. The primary purpose of this study is to uncover whether passive movement of the lower limb will influence muscle oxygen demand and thereby increasing blood flow. An increase in muscle oxygen demand is likely to increase both blood flow rate and the number of capillaries, which would induce the healing of wounds, that were not previously possible. The secondary purpose is to increase understanding of the pathophysiological processes in wound healing through the study of biochemical markers of vascularization, inflammation and stem cell recruitment in blood samples. Further on analyzing the skin and muscle biopsies of the number and quality of endothelial cells and Capillary density and to develop new quantifiable methods to evaluate wound healing in. The project is a randomized trial, consisting of simple passive training to improve blood vessel function, increase the growth of the smallest blood vessels, thereby preventing ulceration and ultimately amputation.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pl-vegf165 (Neovasculgen) is effective in the treatment of ulcers related to diabetic foot syndrome

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 6- versus 12-week antibiotic therapy in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated medically.

This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study conducted in 3 parallel cohorts of diabetic patients with at least 1 infected foot ulcer. Patients will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 study treatments; systemic antibiotic therapy and standard ulcer care with either (A) daily application of a gentamicin-sponge, (B) daily application of a placebo-sponge or (C) no-sponge, in the ratio 2:1:1. Patients will be treated for approximately 28 days and return to the clinic weekly for safety and efficacy assessments. After completing treatment, patients will return to the clinic for scheduled follow-up visits approximately 10, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment is stopped.