Active clinical trials for "Disease Progression"

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a prototype of chronic, progressive, and fibrotic lung disease. It has been considered rare, with an incidence estimated to 11.5 cases per 100 000 individuals per year. Increasing rates of hospital admissions and deaths due to IPF suggest an increasing burden of disease. The median survival time from diagnosis is 2-4 years. Recently two disease-modifying therapies, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been approved worldwide. Both drugs reduce the disease progression as measured by progressive decline in forced vital capacity (FVC), with a reduction of overall mortality showed by meta-analysis of phase III pirfenidone trials. However, progression of disease continues to occur despite the currently available drug therapy. Many patients die from progressive, chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure, or less frequently from acute exacerbation of pulmonary fibrosis. In these patients, no data are available to guide management between continuation of the prescribed antifibrotic drug, to switch to the other available antifibrotic drug, or to combine the available drugs. The combination of nintedanib and pirfenidone is not recommended outside clinical trials. However, although both antifibrotic drugs were developed and approved as monotherapy, two recent trials have suggested the feasibility and safety of combining them over a 12-24 weeks period. These results encourage further studies of combination treatment with pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with IPF. Such study is timely, as there is a risk that clinicians facing the continued worsening of disease in patients receiving one of the available drugs may prescribe both drugs combined outside clinical trials, potentially exposing patients to a currently unknown risk. This study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the combination pirfenidone and nintedanib as compared to a "switch monotherapy": i.e. switching from the current to the other of the two existing drugs prescribed as monotherapy, in patients who present chronic worsening IPF despite receiving either pirfenidone or nintedanib and as to a "control group": i.e.treatment still be on as before randomization (pirfenidone or nintedanib).

In France, since the reimbursement of Lutathera®, this treatment is allowed for retreatment if patients still fulfill the criteria of its indication and 4 news cycles could be proposed. However, clinical practices are heterogeneous regarding the number of new cycles and most teams perform only two additional cycles (every 8 weeks). Therefore, the coordinator propose to evaluate the efficacy of two additional cycle of Lutathera® versus active surveillance in patients already retreated with two cycles Lutathera® for a new progression of intestinal neuroendocrine tumor and who previously received the 4 cycles of treatment with a clinical benefit.

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that the ECCO2R pulsatile configuration prevents the Willebrand factor high molecular weight multimers decrease observed under continuous blood flow configurations. The secondary objectives are to quantify the CO2 extracorporeal removal in the pulsatile configuration, to describe complications (hemorrhagic, thrombotic and hemolytic), to describe patients' gas exchanges under ECCO2R, to describe the clinical course of the patients under ECCO2R as well as during the whole stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

This study aims first to assess the efficacy, safety, and effectiveness of the LUSZ COVID-19 therapy consisting of a comparative study of three different treatment approaches: antiviral, antiretroviral, and immunosuppressive IL-6 receptor antagonist, and second to identify high-risk factors and biomarkers associated with fatal outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The study seeks to validate a novel predictive scoring model for disease progression and evaluate the impact of these treatments on mortality, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and time to recovery.

Prospective, non-randomized, single arm phase II trial with 2 cohorts of ALK+ ALCL treated with nivolumab

Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Due to significant risk of side effects and uncertainty about the benefits, physicians and patients are seeking alternatives to delay androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic BCR. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (LCn3), mainly found in seafood and fatty fish, have beneficial effects against prostate cancer in pre-clinical experimental studies and randomized clinical trials of intermediate prostate cancer outcomes. The current observational evidence also supports testing LCn3 in prostate cancer patients. LCn3 have beneficial effects on inflammation, cardiovascular, psychological, and other outcomes, contrasting sharply with ADT-associated side effects. Investigators propose to conduct a pilot randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects over one year of an innovative LCn3 supplement (5g of omega-3-rich fish oil daily, including 4g of monoglycerides eicosapentaenoic acid (MAG-EPA)) in 40 men experiencing BCR or prostate cancer progression after a curative treatment. This project proposes a simple intervention by dietary supplementation that could eventually help to prevent or delay ADT-related side effects and thus could contribute to diminish the heavy individual and societal burden of prostate cancer. The clinical data generated by this pilot trial will serve as basis for a larger-scale phase II clinical trial.

A double blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to evaluate effectiveness of azithromycin prophylaxis on mortality in advanced HIV.

Safety evaluation and initial efficacy evaluation will be conducted in a group of patients as a non-commercial, open-label clinical trial of dinutuximab beta (Qarziba) phase IIa. The investigational medicinal product will be dinutuximab beta (anti-GD2 antibodies against GD2 disialoganglioside on NBL cells) at a dose of 10 mg / m2 / day by continuous infusion for 5 days in combination with irinotecan / temozolomide, topotecan / temozolomide or N5 / N6 chemotherapy GPOH protocol. The study group will be patients with recurrent / progression of NBL or disease resistant to first-line treatment, for whom there are currently no standards of management, and the treatment methods used so far do not give a chance to achieve a permanent remission of the disease. After diagnosis of relapse / progression or resistance to treatment, it is permissible to administer 2 cycles of standard chemotherapy prior to enrollment in the study. The study plans to recruit 20 patients who will receive 5-7 cycles of DB with chemotherapy. The choice of an appropriate chemotherapy regimen will depend on the patient's prior treatment and tolerance. The safety assessment will be conducted based on the registration of the types and frequency of adverse reactions identified on the basis of the registration of clinical parameters, symptoms and / or diseases reported by the patient or identified during the intervention and / or follow-up visits, abnormal laboratory and / or imaging test results. The initial assessment of the effectiveness will consist in comparing the percentage of objective responses obtained and the annual EFS and PFS (imaging tests, including scintigraphy, bone marrow examination and tumor markers). The study also included an exploratory evaluation of the usefulness of immunological, genetic and other studies.

Pembrolizumab plus autologous dendritic cell vaccine in patients with PD-L1 negative advanced mesothelioma who have failed prior therapies.This is an exploratory, single-arm, open-label, phase 1b clinical trial. Patients will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg and autologous dendritic cell vaccine every 3 weeks for the first 6 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks until confirmed progression or for a maximum of 2 years (see Figure 1 Study Schema). After each vaccine administration patients will receive IL-2 3 MU s.c. for 5 days, from day +2 to day +6.

This phase I/II trial studies the best dose and side effects of encorafenib, cetuximab, and nivolumab and how well they work together in treating patients with microsatellite stable, BRAFV600E gene mutated colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) or has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Encorafenib and cetuximab may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.Giving encorafenib, cetuximab, and nivolumab may work better in treating patients with colorectal cancer compared to cetuximab alone.