Active clinical trials for "Intervertebral Disc Displacement"

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common pathological process leading to spinal surgery. Open discectomy used to be a widespread procedure for surgical treatment for symptomatic LDH. Currently, several minimal invasive surgeries have been uesd widely. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy(PLD) and ozone therapy are two widely used minimal invasive treatment, and ozone therapy combined other minimally invasive treatment could improve other minimally invasive treatment's clinical effectiveness. The effectiveness of which has been proved to be comparable to conventional open discectomy. In this study, a single-blind randomized controlled trial will be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two minimal invasive discectomy, percutaneous lumbar discectomy combined with ozone and percutaneous lumbar discectomy, for the treatment of symptomatic LDH. Two groups of patients will be investigated; 1) patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing PLD combined with ozone, and 2) patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation undergoing PLD. The primary endpoints of the study will be changes in in pain and functional status by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional status as measured by Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire (Oswestry Disability Index,ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) as measured at pre- and post-operation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months. Secondary outcomes include response evaluation by MacNab response evaluation criteria as measured at pre- and post-operation, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months. Treatment effect is defined as the difference in the mean change from baseline between the two groups. For the first time,the results of this trial will provide scientific evidence as to the relative effectiveness of PLD combined with ozone versus PLD for minimal invasive surgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.

The purpose of this observational study is to show whether a standard oral steroid dose pack can be used as a screening tool to assess the effectiveness of a subsequent epidural steroid injection (ESI). If an oral steroid does not give a patient significant temporary relief of pain from a herniated lumbar disc then an epidural steroid injection will not either. Therefore the risk and expense associated from the interventional pain management procedure for those patients could be avoided and other treatment modalities pursued.

We propose here to evaluate the precision of lumbar periradicular infiltration performed under a transverse ultrasound approach by performing a fluoroscopic control once the needle in the desired position. The effectiveness of the technique will be assessed by measuring different pain and disability scores at four weeks post-infiltration: the Visual analogue pain Scale score, the DN4 score, and the Oswestry disability score (ODI); The decrease in irradiation received will be collected, compared to that of the conventional fluoroscopic technique.

Lumbar radicular pain is defined as low back and leg pain caused by inflammation in the affected nerve root due to various etiological factors. In its treatment, there are various options such as anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy modalities, exercises, epidural steroid injections, and surgery. Epidural steroid injections have also become a frequently applied method in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain unresponsive to conservative treatments. The steroid applied here acts by suppressing the inflammation around the affected nerve root. Epidural steroid injections can be applied in lumbar radicular pain with 3 different approaches: caudal, interlaminar and transforaminal. In the transforaminal approach, a small amount of drug is injected into the epidural space, and in previous studies, reduction in pain and improvement in functionality were found in patients with lumbar radicular pain in the short and medium term. As far as we know, there is no previous study investigating the effect of fibromyalgia on TFESE treatment outcomes. For this reason, the aim of our study is to examine the effect of fibromyalgia on treatment outcomes in patients who underwent TFESE for lumbar radicular pain.

This is an investigator-initiated study. The primary goal is to evaluate the efficacy of two different cervical disc prosthetic devices with respect to postoperative change in neck disability index. The evaluation will include clinical and radiological parameters.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two minimal invasive endoscopic discectomy, PTED and MED, for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.

Patients are being asked to participate in a research study because the patients are being treated for low back pain and the patients have decided to have an epidural steroid injection. Low back pain has a tremendous impact on the individual and society. It not only affects the individuals quality of life, it also contributes to lost productivity and increased health care costs. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common treatment option for many forms of low back pain. They have been used for low back problems since 1952 and are still being used as a non-surgical form of treatment for low back pain. The goal of the injections is reduction of pain, increased quality of life and improved function. This study is being conducted to determine the outcomes of injections given at the "level of MRI Pathology" versus at the "level of clinical symptoms" to see if one is more effective than the other and to learn more about the characteristics of the two different injections.

Summary: This is a prospective randomize study to compare conservative and aggressive discectomy for treatment of disc herniation with radiculopathy. Study hypothesis: The investigators believe that conservative discectomy could preserve a higher disc space and has a better long-term outcomes.

Acute low back pain is one of the most common reasons for all physician visits(1). Phospholipase A2 (PLA2), a potent inflammatory mediator, has demonstrated to be released by discs following injury(4). Clinical practice and animal research suggest that lumbar radicular pain is the result of inflammation of the nerve root in the epidural space(5). The study will evaluate the efficacy of intravenous Dexamethasone for acute disc herniation-induced sciatica. 40 patients aged 18 years or older, who will be transferred to the emergency room due to sciatic pain will be blindly randomized to receive Dexamethasone 30 mg IV for 3 days an tapering off, 10 mg daily, or normal saline. 20 patients will be in each group. The patients will continue their standard care during the study period. Follow up will last for 3 months. Mann-Whitney test will be used for parametric correlation, Wilcoxon for numeral and x² for categorial variables. Dexamethasone IV can help physicians in treating patients with acute sciatic pain.

Intervertebral disc degenerations are the most important cause of chronic low back pain resulting in job loss and associated socio-economic problems in developed and developing industrial countries 1. More than 40% of the Turkish population has experienced low back pain at least once in their life 2. Intervertebral disc degenerations Lumbal Disc Herniation (LDH), which is frequently represented, can cause motor and sensory losses in the lower extremity by compressing the spinal nerves. Lumbar disc surgery procedure is inevitable in case of advanced functional losses in the related sensory dermatomes and muscles after LDH. Lumbal disc surgeries are performed for the purpose of decompression of nerve pressures on nerves due to advanced disc herniation. they suggest 4. One of the most common LDH problems in the community is low foot problems due to weakness of the tibialis anterior muscle, which occurs due to L4-L5 disc herniation, and the accompanying functional disorders. In disc herniations at this level, the activation of the tibialis anterior muscle, which is compressed by the nerve root, decreases compared to the medial gastrocnemius muscle, where it works as an antagonist, and this leads to functional limitations, especially in gait and balance activities. Spinal stabilization exercises are a concept that emerged from the idea that exercise is important for the provision and preservation of functionality of people with low back and back pain due to LDH. According to this exercise approach, muscles are of great importance in providing lumbar region stability. These muscles are classified as general (global) stabilizing muscles, which are dynamic, phasic, and power-producing muscles, and regional (local) stabilizing muscles, which are postural, tonic, and stabilizer muscles. The main muscles responsible for spine stabilization are multifidus, transversus abdominus and pelvic floor muscles 6. It is argued that increased lumbo-pelvic motor control thanks to spine stabilization facilitates lower extremity activities, especially flexion and extension movements in the sagittal plane. Patients with LDH who increase their motor strength can use lower extremity movements more functionally. The aim of this study was to (1) determine the activation rates of the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius muscles during different functional activities in the lower extremities affected and unaffected by LDH, (2) to compare the rates of the affected extremity to the rates of the healthy extremity during coactivation of the transversus abdominus and multifidus muscles (spinal stabilization basic exercise). to determine whether it is close or not. According to the hypothesis of this study, the researchers thought that the functional activities performed together with the activation of the transversus abdominus and multifidus muscles would show coactivation behaviors at a rate closer to the healthy extremity.