Active clinical trials for "Diverticulum"

This is a multicenter investigator-initiated trial between Baylor-Scotts & White (BSW) and Methodist Health System (MHS). This study will be conducted via a retrospective review and a prospective patient registry. Patients who have undergone the ZPOEM procedure performed by the physicians listed in this protocol will be included, as well as patients who will have this procedure in the future. Data that will be collected at MHS will be entered into an Excel spreadsheet. Patient demographic information will be collected via a review of subjects' electronic medical records. Available patient outcomes will be collected via a review of electronic medical records. This review will be conducted from 1/1/2017 through 12/31/2025.

This study analyses interest of iv nefopam in combination with paracetamol after major abdominal surgery because the effect of morphine-sparing is discussed when combined these agents.

This is a multi-centre, randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel groups, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a population of patients suffering from symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease in order to investigate which is the best treatment in preventing relapses of the disease. Patients were randomly divided in double-blind fashion in one of the following groups: Group A. Active mesalazine 800 mg, 2 tablets/day for 10 days/month plus Lactobacillus casei placebo, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month; Group B. Active Lactobacillus casei, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month plus mesalazine 800 placebo, 2 tablets/day for 10 days/month; Group C. Active mesalazine 800 ng, 2 tablets/day plus Active Lactobacillus casei, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month; Group D. Mesalazine 800 mg placebo, 2 tablets/day and Lactobacillus casei placebo, 1 sachet/day for 10 days/month. The main objective was to assess the safety and the efficacy of mesalazine and/or Lactobacillus casei in maintaining remission of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease

The purpose of this study is to determine the tissue kinetics of ertapenem in colonic tissue from three hours up to six hours (25% of dosing interval) after administration of ertapenem.

Aim: This is a prospective, randomized comparison of traditional open (OS) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated diverticular disease. The study is designed in order to minimize bias by standardizing the two procedures and blinding patients and nurses during the preoperative and early postoperative period. Hypothesis: A laparoscopic approach for sigmoidectomy has significant advantages over the open technique with respect to postoperative pain, duration of ileus, length of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity. Methods: Patients with complicated diverticular disease who are candidates for elective sigmoidectomy will be randomized the day before surgery, and anaesthetic technique and postoperative management will be standardized between groups. Surgeons with experience in both laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy will perform both types of procedures. At the end of the operation, identical, opaque wound dressings will be applied and left in place until postoperative day 4. Both patients and nursing staff will therefore be blinded to the type of surgical technique during the early postoperative period. Endpoints: A) Postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale at postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. B) Postoperative intake of systemic opiates (morphine) C) Duration of postoperative ileus, quantified by the interval in hours between the end of the procedure and passage of first stool. D) Duration of hospital stay. E) Surgical complications, such as wound infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding F) General medical complications, such as cardiopulmonary, pneumonia, and renal failure. Rationale: This study will determine whether a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is associated with significant clinical advantages over the traditional open approach when patients with complicated diverticular disease are blinded to the operative technique.

Diverticulosis (bulges in the bowel wall) affects two third of the elderly population in the UK. Diverticular disease and its complications are responsible for 68000 hospital admissions and 2000 deaths per year. It commonly produces recurrent short lived abdominal pain, changes in bowel habit and incontinence. The causes of symptoms are not known and the treatments unsatisfactory. Recent studies have found an association between inflammation, alteration of bowel nerves and symptoms. Mesalazine is an anti-inflammatory drug used in inflammatory bowel conditions, such as ulcerative colitis and crohn's disease. We plan to perform a randomized double blind (neither the patients or the doctors known which treatment the patient is taking) placebo (sham medication) controlled trial of mesalazine in symptomatic diverticular disease patients. We anticipate a reduction in the amount of inflammation, bowel nerve changes and symptoms in patients taking mesalazine compare to those taking the placebo.

Over the last decade there has been a growing interest toward the application of robotic approach for diverticular disease. The evidence available on the literature showed that robotic approach, compared to the laparoscopic surgery, offers significant advantages in terms of conversion rate and shortened hospital stay for the treatment of diverticular disease. The investigators aimed at evaluating whether robotic colectomy may offer some advantages over the laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of diverticular disease by analyzing a one year multicenter prospective study. Primary objective is to evaluate if robotic approach reduce the rate of conversion to open approach compared to laparoscopic surgery. Secondary objective is to assess difference between the two approaches in terms of rate of intraoperative complication, postoperative morbidities (according with Clavien and Dindo Classification), hospital stay and at one year follow up. Inclusion criteria are: elective colectomy for complicated or non-complicated diverticular disease performed with laparoscopic or robotic approach and age between 18 and 90 years. Exclusion criteria are non-elective colectomy (emergency resection), open procedure, diverticular resection performed during other procedure (i.e. colectomy for cancer). Data will be collected in one year from the start of the study. Due to the lack of available evidence, it is impossible to draw definitive conclusions. With this study, the investigators hope to clarify the role of the robotic approach in the treatment of diverticular disease.

The purpose of the study is evaluate the safety and efficacy of L-glutamine as a treatment for patients with diverticulosis.

Phase III trial is designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a free diet versus a progressive diet in the treatment of acute diverticulitis (AD) without complications. In this study, the effectiveness of the short-term free diet is evaluated, as well as its safety and the quality of life that is perceived in front of the progressive diet.

This study will evaluate the effect of endoscopic clipping of colonic diverticula in treatment of symptoms related to diverticular disease. Half of the participants will undergo colonoscopy without the clipping procedure and half will have colonoscopy with clipping of all visible diverticula.