Active clinical trials for "Substance-Related Disorders"

More than 90% of women in substance use treatment report history of physical and/or sexual trauma, and up to 60% meet criteria for both substance use disorder (SUD) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD typically precedes onset of SUD, with substances used as a means to cope with physiological, psychological, and emotional symptoms resulting from the trauma. Women with PTSD experience greater severity of addiction symptoms, readmit into treatment more frequently than women without PTSD, and tend to have poorer treatment outcomes. Due to increased risk for exacerbation of PTSD on SUD severity and treatment success, and the specific vulnerabilities and needs of women with this comorbidity, SUD treatments that target both substance use and trauma recovery are needed. However, few interventions target both SUD and PTSD concurrently, and fewer still are specific to women. Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) has been shown to decrease craving, relapse rates, and quantity/frequency of use across several substances, and has shown acceptability in diverse populations. MBRP integrates mindfulness practices with cognitive behavioral and exposure-based approaches to increase self-regulatory skills while experiencing triggers previously associated with substance use, including challenging affective states such as those common to experienced trauma. Adapting MBRP to incorporate trauma education and treatment approaches has the potential to effectively treat women with the dual vulnerabilities of trauma history and SUD. The current study is thus designed to determine feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an adapted Trauma-Informed Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (TI-MBRP) intervention for women in substance use treatment settings who have PTSD. TI-MBRP integrates trauma education and treatment approaches drawn from Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) into the standard MBRP protocol to provide a trauma-informed approach to treating women in substance use treatment settings. The current proposal will evaluate TI-MBRP, using a randomized, pre-post design, with 100 women in residential substance abuse treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to participate in a 4-week TI-MBRP intervention or to continue with treatment as usual (TAU). Assessments will be collected pretest, posttest, and at one-month follow-up. Data from this study will lay the groundwork for a larger scale clinical trial to determine the efficacy of TI-MBRP.

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness and implementation of a brief, integrated behavioral intervention for HIV medication adherence and substance use in the HIV care setting in South Africa. The intervention is specifically designed to be implemented by non-specialist counselors using a task sharing model in local HIV clinics. The behavioral intervention will be compared to usual care, enhanced with referral to a local outpatient substance use treatment program (Enhanced Standard of Care - ESOC) on study endpoints (as described in study endpoint section below).

Substance Use Disorder has been showing a rising trend all over the world including India. The project tested whether a Integrated community wide effort of Prevention and Awareness Groups (PAG) to manage substance use would have a greater effect on treatment attendance and drug abstinence than a de-addiction program alone.

This study developed and assessed an innovative, high-reach, easily implementable, low-cost computer-delivered intervention (Safe and Healthy Experiences; The SHE Program) that addresses known barriers in early identification and intervention with sheltered battered women with IPV (intimate partner violence) and substance use.

The fundamental objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of an intensive in-home family-based treatment, Multidimensional Family Therapy, with a multifaceted residential treatment, Adolescent Residential Treatment, over 4 years post-intake and to delineate the mechanisms of change for each treatment. The study targets dually- diagnosed adolescent drug abusers recommended for residential treatment.

Research has provided support for the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral and family interventions for adolescent substance use disorders (SUD), HIV-risk behaviors, and related problems. Despite support for these interventions, substantial heterogeneity in treatment outcomes and high relapse rates has been consistently found across studies. Such variability highlights the need for innovative strategies to broaden the impact and strengthen the durability of effects of adolescent substance abuse treatments. Over the past two decades, research has shown the positive effects of contingency management (CM) methods on reductions in substance use and other problem behaviors. When combined with evidence-based practices, emerging research suggests that CM integration may also be effective for adolescent substance abusers. The proposed Stage II efficacy trial examines the integration of CM with two empirically-supported interventions: group MET/CBT and FFT. By comparing two intervention modalities (group vs. family, the study provides a unique opportunity to examine the robustness of the effects of CM across established adolescent treatments, and to compare change mechanisms that may account for treatment outcomes. In the proposed research, substance abusing adolescents (n = 160) will be randomly assigned either to FFT or group MET/CBT. Random assignment will also be used to determine whether or not youth will receive a CM condition that provides incentives for abstinence (i.e., clean urine screens) and treatment participation. The primary aim of the study is to examine the efficacy of an integrated CM intervention for the two evidence-based treatments for adolescents, MET/CBT and FFT, compared to these treatments without CM on drug abuse abstinence (a) during treatment (i.e., speed of effects) and (b) at post-treatment follow-up assessments (i.e., durability of effects). A second aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of CM on hypothesized mediators of the intervention effects in the MET/CBT and the FFT conditions. The investigators anticipate that the CM conditions, compared to the nonCM conditions, are more likely to accelerate the adolescent's motivation (1) to achieve abstinence, to attend and participate in treatment, and to complete homework assignments. The investigators will also examine the effects of the interventions on HIV-risk behaviors and expect that CM will demonstrate the largest reductions in HIV-risk behaviors compared to the nonCM conditions.

The purpose of this study is to see if computer tasks that challenge the brain (cognitively stimulating tasks) can improve memory and other types of thinking in adolescents and young adults who are being treated for substance use problems. The study will compare the effects of different versions of the computer tasks.

The fundamental objective of the proposed study is to develop and test an innovative two-stage, cross-systems family-based intervention for substance abusing juvenile offenders. The first stage of the experimental treatment is provided for youths in juvenile detention settings. Stage two of the intervention occurs after the offender is released to the community. Participants are randomized to one of two study conditions: the cross-systems family-based intervention (Multidimensional Family Therapy-Cross Systems (MDFT-CS), or 2) Enhanced Services as Usual (ESAU). Both conditions incorporate HIV prevention in detention and we will also examine the effects of a family-based HIV/STD prevention module beyond the impact of a standard HIV/STD education intervention delivered in detention by including ongoing HIV/STD intervention in MDFT-CS following release from detention. There are five aims of the proposed study. These aims relate to: 1) Intervention development and implementation; 2) Clinical effectiveness; 3) Impact of HIV/AIDS/STD prevention; 4) Comparative benefit-costs; and 5) Systems-level impact

Patient-Centered Trauma Treatment, i.e., treatment delivered by peers with lived-experience, has the potential to increase access to trauma treatment in underserved communities. This could positively impact the lives of millions of people as 70% of adults in the U.S have experienced a traumatic event and the consequences of trauma are devastating and far reaching, including chronic and comorbid physical and mental health problems. The most known consequences of trauma include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs). Seeking Safety (SS) is the most effective evidenced-based treatment for co-occurring trauma, PTSD and SUDs. While no specific degree or experience level is required to conduct SS, all the evidence comes from studies using trained clinicians to implement the treatment, including social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists. However, these research findings do not generalize to underserved communities that lack mental health professionals. Innovative approaches to treatment, such as peer-delivered services, are required to meet the demand for care in underserved areas. While the benefits of peer-delivered services have been well-documented in many areas, the value of peers in the provision of trauma-treatment is unknown. A theoretical basis supports the potential for peer-delivered trauma-treatment to be effective in addition to the strong therapist-patient bond, (i.e. therapeutic alliance (TA), which is an important predictor of treatment outcome and a typical result of peer-patient relationships. Our research question is whether there is a difference between peer-led SS (PL-SS) groups and clinician-led SS (CL-SS) groups in improving the lives of people with trauma, PTSD and SUDs? The investigators have three specific aims: Determine the effectiveness of PL-SS groups compared to CL-SS groups in decreasing substance use and PTSD symptoms and improving coping skills, overall mental health and physical health. Hypothesis: PL-SS compared to CL-SS groups will be as effective in improving outcomes. Compare levels of TA among PL-SS and CL-SS groups and examine the impact of TA on outcomes.Hypotheses: Levels of TA will be higher and will play more of a role in impacting outcomes in the PL-SS compared to CL-SS groups. Determine if the standard Seeking Safety Instructor Training (SS-IT) is adequate for peers. Hypothesis: Peers will identify topics that will enhance the SS-IT.

The purpose of this study is to test the effects of exercise on cocaine use, fitness, and cravings for cocaine and nicotine. This study is part of an effort to develop treatments for cocaine abuse.