Treatment of Prolonged Uterine Bleeding of Etonogestrel (ENG)-Releasing Implant
Breakthrough BleedingLong-acting reversible contraceptives [LARC; copper-intrauterine devices (IUDs), the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and subdermal implants] are the most effective reversible contraceptives available. A common side effect of these methods is changes in menstrual bleeding. Dissatisfaction with unpredictable bleeding is the main reason for early discontinuation of LARC methods. The mechanism of unpredictable bleeding is unknown; it is likely related to the progestogen dilating superficial veins and capillaries, which are fragile and susceptible to focal bleeding. Other potential influences include changes in structural support of the endometrium, altered matrix metalloproteinase activity, and changes in endometrial perfusion and hemostasis. Local genetic alterations of the hormonal receptors of endometrium can also play a role in the etiology of the unpredictable bleeding experienced by some women. Regarding etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant, some evidences suggest that the use of mefenamic acid, mifepristone with estradiol or doxycycline, or doxycycline alone can temporally stop the bleeding; however, all these therapies cannot avert the recurrence of the bleeding. Recently, a randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of a short-term use of combined oral contraceptive (COC) in stopping bleeding episodes and preventing bleeding recurrence. The authors found that bothersome bleeding in ENG-implant users stopped within 14-day of COC treatment, but bleeding most often resumes within 10 days of treatment cessation. Although COC can stop the bleeding, it is not known which component of the COC is responsible for this effect. There is evidence suggesting that estrogen alone is not effective in stopping the bleeding of progestogen-only contraceptives or a high dose of ethinyl estradiol is needed to obtain this effect. Furthermore, the recurrence of the bleeding shown with the COC use could be explained by the interruption of the estrogen. For this reason, our hypothesis is that a progestogen-only pill could be superior to placebo in stopping the bleeding associated with the ENG-implant use as well as being superior to placebo in recurrence of bleeding after discontinuation of the therapy.
Effects of a Progestin on Frequent and/or Prolonged Bleeding With Nexplanon™
Birth ControlContraception3 moreEffects of norethindrone acetate (NTA) in patients with Nexplanon.
Surgical Myomectomy Followed by Oral Myfembree Versus Standard of Care Trial (SOUL)
MetrorrhagiaPelvic Pain2 moreIn this project, the proposition is that the use of daily dosed Myfembree ( a combination of relugolix with estradiol and norethindrone acetate), FDA-approved medication to treat heavy menses fibroid-related symptoms, has the potential to delay the recurrence of fibroid symptoms, prolong the improved quality of life and delay the need for re-intervention after uterine sparing surgery versus the routine standard of care.
Use of Curcumin to Treat Unfavorable Bleeding Patterns in Contraceptive Implant Users
BleedingImplants1 moreThe investigators plan to study the effects of curcumin, the active ingredient in the spice turmeric, on the irregular bleeding experienced by women who use the contraceptive implant.
Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding After Tubal Sterilization
ContraceptionDysfunctional Uterine BleedingIn this study, the investigators will compare the frequency and amount of bleeding after tubal sterilization and salpingectomy
Study of Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy...
MenorrhagiaDysfunctional Uterine Bleeding3 moreApproximately 600,000 women undergo hysterectomy each year in the United States, of which 12% are laparoscopic. The most common indications for hysterectomy are: symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (40.7%), endometriosis (17.7%), and prolapse (14.5%). The first total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed by Reich et al in 1988. Many studies have proven that laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with lower preoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and shorter recovery times than abdominal hysterectomy. The literature has also shown the complication rates for laparoscopic cases are similar to open procedures in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice state that laparoscopic hysterectomy is an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. The ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice site multiple advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy to abdominal hysterectomy including faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer abdominal wall/wound infections. Despite the recommendations of ACOG for a more minimally invasive approach, 66% of all hysterectomies are performed abdominally. Key reasons for the lag in utilization of laparoscopic techniques are the technical obstacles of performing minimally invasive hysterectomies. Robotic technology has emerged as a means to decrease the learning curve and increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery to patients. A current review of the literature reveals no randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigator's aim is to address this void. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy is equivalent to Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with respect to operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay. The investigator's secondary objective was to assess the cost, morbidity, and mortality of each procedure.
Study of a Progestin to Prevent Bleeding Associated With Initiation of Medical Menopause With GnRH...
Dysfunctional Uterine BleedingIn this study, the investigators would like to see if giving medroxyprogesterone acetate for 3 weeks after Leuprolide acetate injection will help to decrease this amount of bleeding, decrease the amount of nausea, bloating and cramping and increase patient satisfaction
Nonsurgical Management of Cesarean Scar Niche Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Intermenstrual BleedingA study of the effect of three different nonsurgical methods for management of abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche. The study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of the Saudi German Hospital in Madinah- Saudi Arabia, during the period between March 2019 to October 2022. The study protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki declaration 1964 and the later amendments. A prospective approval was granted by the human research ethics committee of the hospital and the study participants have signed an informed consent.
The Use of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Device (Metraplant-E) in the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine...
Dysfunctional Uterine BleedingResearch hypothesis: Release of levonorgestrel from Metraplant-E levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine contraceptive device is inadequate to be used as a medical line of treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The investigators aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the intrauterine system (Metraplant-E) in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Tactile Electrosurgical Ablation in Cases of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding
Dysfunction Uterine BleedingAbnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is any alteration in the pattern or volume of menstrual blood flow and heavy menstrual bleeding affects up to 30% of women at some time during their reproductive years. Abnormal menstruation can be due to conditions such as pregnancy complication uterine fibroids and adenomyosis, but in a large proportion of cases, the etiology is unclear, a condition generally referred to as dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). Treatment options for DUB include symptomatic medical treatment or surgery, traditionally hysterectomy. Hysteroscopically guided endometrial ablation methods have been shown to be effective and safe alternatives to hysterectomy for management of DUB. These methods require particular skills and experience and a long learning curve to be performed effectively and safely. Through the past three decades DUB patients in Assiut university hospital were treated with either electrosurgical ablation or hysterectomy. When faced with hysteroscopic challenges during transcervical resection of the endometrium or rollerball coagulation, we used to shift to thermal balloon as backup method . However, expensive uterine balloon could not infrequently be afforded because of financial constrains and limited health resources . Therefore, another method was used as backup for hysteroscopic failures. It was first tried via insulating the conventional double-ended uterine curette then through a specially designed tactile electrosurgical ablation (TEA) probe.The technique of TEA is largely similar to the dilatation and curettage procedure both principally and practically. Hence, the basic requirements for its performance are the general awareness with electrosurgical principles and adequate experience in performing dilatation and curettage. TEA is done by specially designed tactile diathermy probe that carried the job of electrosurgical ablation without hysteroscopy or distension media first in an experimental session that clearly clarified the reproducibility of the depth of thermal damage and safety of the tactile electrosurgical ablator . Thereafter, TEA was successfully performed with satisfactory short and medium term outcomes for ten cases with DUB during an active, relentless bleeding attack. TEA is done under laparoscopic monitoring. The aim of the present work is to present TEA as a simple, inexpensive, novel backup approach for treatment of DUB.