Active clinical trials for "Edema"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab have been shown to improve vision in eyes with DME. In eyes with DME and at least moderate vision loss, both aflibercept and bevacizumab were also shown to be successful in many eyes. However, aflibercept was shown to be more effective at improving vision, on average, at 1 year and at 2 years. Due to the large cost difference between the two drugs, many clinicians and patients are choosing to initiate treatment with bevacizumab and then switch to aflibercept depending on the eye's response to bevacizumab treatment. However, there is no scientific evidence that this treatment strategy is as effective at improving vision as initiating treatment with aflibercept. Patients and clinicians do not know if this approach ultimately has deleterious effects on visual acuity. If starting with aflibercept is not better than starting with bevacizumab and switching to aflibercept if needed, the potential cost savings to future patients and the health care system would be substantial. However, if starting with aflibercept is better, then patients, clinicians, and health care providers can make informed decisions for how to best treat patients with DME and at least moderate vision loss. Study Objectives To compare the efficacy of intravitreous aflibercept with intravitreous bevacizumab + deferred aflibercept if needed in eyes with CI DME and moderate vision loss

A Phase 3b, Open-Label Extension Study to evaluate safety and how long response of EN3835 (Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum [CCH]-aaes) lasts in the treatment of Cellulite.

An open-label study of safety and effectiveness of EN3835 in the treatment of cellulite in adult women.

The objective of this study is to investigate if the drug ranibizumab administrated by microdose injection into the eye is safe and effective to treat diabetic macular edema.

Selective Retina Therapy (SRT) is an effective and safe laser treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular edema which targets the retinal pigment epithelium while sparing the neurosensory retina.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has become now a widely used treatment modality in ICU and emergency services to deal with respiratory failure.1 NIV has the potential to improve ventilatory assistance while avoiding endotracheal intubation and its complications. Since the first publications of Meduri2 and Brochard3 the number of studies on the NIV has been growing and developing and this technique becomes one of the major progress in the field of respiratory assistance. Decompensation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is certainly the least questionable indication of the NIV. However, indication of the NIV is inexorably spreading to other types of acute respiratory insufficiency, including acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE).4 Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most currently used non-invasive ventilation usually performed without the use of a ventilator. NIV using pressure support (NIPSV) combined pressure support (inspiratory aid) and positive expiratory pressure as in CPAP. Based on physiological ground, NIPSV would be more performant than CPAP to improve ventilatory parameters and reduce the work breathing in APE. However, this issue is not settled yet. Number of meta-analysis over the last 2 years were devoted to the comparison of CPAP and NISPV,5 so that the scientific evidence is still far from established. In addition, it is not sur that patients enrolled in these studies are representative of all patients with APE. The fact that they were included solely on the basis of clinical criteria, the risk of overlap with other diagnoses is not negligible. Thus the use of markers of heart failure as the BNP (brain natriuretic peptide) would be very useful. On the other hand, the possible deleterious effect of NIPSV on myocardial perfusion is a problem that has not been definitively resolved. Objectives of the study: Compare the efficacy and safety of the NIPSV with those of CPAP in patients presenting to the emergency department with CPE. Compare the two procedures in subgroups of patients with hypercapnia and high BNP concentration.

The purpose of this study is to compare a single intravitreal injection of 4.0 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and 1.25 mg of bevacizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with sham injections in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO); 392 patients with CRVO were enrolled at 95 investigational sites in the United States. The study included a treatment period (6 months) and an observation period (6 months).

This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with sham injections in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO); 397 patients with BRVO were enrolled at 93 investigational sites in the United States. The study included a treatment period (6 months) and an observation period (6 months).