Active clinical trials for "Edema"

This study examined the safety and potential efficacy of the monoclonal antibody efalizumab (Raptiva) for treating sight-threatening uveitis (eye inflammation). Efalizumab controls the activity of white blood cells called lymphocytes that cause inflammation. The drug is currently approved in the United States to treat patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Participants 18 and older with sight-threatening intermediate or posterior uveitis of at least 3 months duration, causing persistent macular edema in one or both eyes, were eligible for this study. The uveitis required treatment with at least 20 milligrams per day of prednisone, or the equivalent, or a combination of two or more anti-inflammatory treatments such as prednisone, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, etc. Participants underwent the following tests and procedures: Medical history and physical examination. Weekly efalizumab treatment. Weekly eye examination, including measurement of vision and pressure in the eyes, dilation of the eyes and examination of the front and back parts of the eye. Weekly blood tests to measure the number and types of cells in the blood and to check for signs of inflammation and treatment side effects. At some visits, blood samples were collected to measure how much efalizumab remains in the blood and whether the body has developed an immune response to the medicine. Blood draw at enrollment and at 2 and 4 months for research tests to examine how participants' immune response was operating. Fluorescein angiography at enrollment and 1 and 3 months after enrollment, unless additional tests are needed, for medical management. This test checked for abnormalities of eye blood vessels. A yellow dye was injected into an arm vein and travels to the blood vessels in the eyes. Pictures of the retina (the back portion of the eye) were taken with a special camera that flashes a blue light into the eye. The pictures show whether any dye has leaked from the vessels into the retina, indicating possible abnormalities. Monthly pregnancy test for women who could become pregnant. Participants returned for treatment and clinic visits weekly for 16 weeks. After 16 weeks, participants whose macular edema had decreased and whose vision may have improved were offered to continue the injections.

Central and branch retinal vein occlusions are major causes of visual loss. Hemorrhage and capillary nonperfusion, when they involve the macula, can contribute to visual loss, but the major cause is macular edema. Focal and grid laser photocoagulation can sometimes provide benefit in patients with macular edema due to branch vein occlusions, but several laser treatments are often needed and recovery of vision can be very slow and incomplete 1. Laser photocoagulation does not provide benefit for macular edema due to central vein occlusions 2. Therefore, new treatments are needed.The objective of this study is to assess the bioactivity of 3 intravitreous injections 0.5 mg or 0.3 mg of ranibizumab in patients with macular edema due to central and branch retinal vein occlusions and correlate activity with peak and trough aqueous levels. The purpose of this research protocol is pilot study to determine if a randomized placebo controlled trial is warranted.

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone for the treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

This study is likely to identify an improved and economical treatment for diabetic macular oedema, one of the commonest causes of blindness both in Australia and the rest of the world.The specific aims of the study are to test the following hypotheses: That intravitreal triamcinolone followed by laser treatment results in a greater improvement in visual acuity than placebo followed by laser treatment of eyes with macular oedema secondary to diabetes; That intravitreal triamcinolone followed by laser treatment results in greater degree of resolution of macular oedema than placebo followed by laser treatment of eyes with macular oedema secondary to diabetes; That intravitreal triamcinolone followed by laser treatment results in a reduced requirement for further laser treatment to control diabetic macular oedema than placebo followed by laser treatment; That intravitreal triamcinolone followed laser has a manageable and acceptable safety profile in eyes with diabetic macular edema.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of XERECEPT® to dexamethasone (Decadron) a common treatment for symptoms of brain swelling (edema). This study is specifically aimed at patients who require chronic high doses of dexamethasone to manage symptoms.

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that an Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) performs better than a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in the management of Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (CPE) within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.

The best treatment strategy for refractory DME is not known, options include switching between anti-VEGF agents, corticosteroids, and vitrectomy. In this study, authors describe a new surgical technique for the treatment of refractory non tractional DME. The technique consists of vitrectomy with ILM peeling with subretinal injection of Ranibizumab.

This is a one month pre post intervention study. Subjects with diabetic macular edema were given intravitreal anti VEGF (Aflibercept) injection. Central retinal thickness, macular electrophysiology, and visual acuity were observed one week and one month after injection was given to the eye to describe early anatomical, physiological, and clinical changes. We hypothesized that changes to these outcomes can be found and documented.

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) of the knee are common subchondral defects, often associated with pain and functional limitation. Subchondroplasty is a percutaneous procedure in which calcium phosphate is injected inside BML areas, ensuring stability and promoting the deposition of new bone. Primary outcome of this study was to obtain a reduction of the Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 points or more at 6 months follow-up in more than 75% of patients. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the osteoarthritic and bone marrow structure evolution in the months after the procedure.